淋巴管吻合治疗淋巴水肿:文献和荟萃分析的系统综述。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Lymphology Pub Date : 2021-04-19 DOI:10.2458/lymph.4670
E. Nacchiero, M. Maruccia, R. Elia, F. Robusto, G. Giudice, O. Manrique, C. Campisi, G. Giudice
{"title":"淋巴管吻合治疗淋巴水肿:文献和荟萃分析的系统综述。","authors":"E. Nacchiero, M. Maruccia, R. Elia, F. Robusto, G. Giudice, O. Manrique, C. Campisi, G. Giudice","doi":"10.2458/lymph.4670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) has been described as an effective treatment for early stages of lymphedema (LE). The aim of this study was to deepen the evaluation of the effectiveness of LVA by performing a metaanalysis to provide information about its utility in specific anatomical sites, clinical stages, duration of lymphedema, and surgical technique. A systematic literature search using PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database was performed in November 2019. Only original studies in which exclusively LVA was performed for primary and/or secondary lymphedema in humans were eligible for data extraction. A meta-analysis was performed on articles with a well-defined endpoint and a subgroup analysis was conducted in relation to surgical technique, duration of lymphedema, stage of pathology. Forty-eight studies, including 6 clinical trials and 42 lowrisk bias observational studies were included in our meta-analysis. 1,281 subjects were included and the majority of articles reported a pre-post analysis. Lymphaticovenular anastomosis appears to result effectively in treatment of lymphedema with an odds ratio of 0.07 (CI: 0.04, 0.13, p<0.001). All subgroup metaanalyses were statistically significant for LVAs specifically with regard to anatomical site, clinical stage, duration of LE, or type of microsurgical procedure (p<0.05). Our meta-analysis confirmed the efficacy of LVAs for the treatment of lymphedema, even when subgroup analysis was performed for clinical stage, duration of pathology, anatomical site of lymphedema, or type of microsurgical procedure. Further prospective trials with a common clearly defined outcome measure are warranted for an unbiased evaluation.","PeriodicalId":51122,"journal":{"name":"Lymphology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lymphovenous anastomosis for the treatment of lymphedema: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"E. Nacchiero, M. Maruccia, R. Elia, F. Robusto, G. Giudice, O. Manrique, C. Campisi, G. Giudice\",\"doi\":\"10.2458/lymph.4670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) has been described as an effective treatment for early stages of lymphedema (LE). The aim of this study was to deepen the evaluation of the effectiveness of LVA by performing a metaanalysis to provide information about its utility in specific anatomical sites, clinical stages, duration of lymphedema, and surgical technique. A systematic literature search using PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database was performed in November 2019. Only original studies in which exclusively LVA was performed for primary and/or secondary lymphedema in humans were eligible for data extraction. A meta-analysis was performed on articles with a well-defined endpoint and a subgroup analysis was conducted in relation to surgical technique, duration of lymphedema, stage of pathology. Forty-eight studies, including 6 clinical trials and 42 lowrisk bias observational studies were included in our meta-analysis. 1,281 subjects were included and the majority of articles reported a pre-post analysis. Lymphaticovenular anastomosis appears to result effectively in treatment of lymphedema with an odds ratio of 0.07 (CI: 0.04, 0.13, p<0.001). All subgroup metaanalyses were statistically significant for LVAs specifically with regard to anatomical site, clinical stage, duration of LE, or type of microsurgical procedure (p<0.05). Our meta-analysis confirmed the efficacy of LVAs for the treatment of lymphedema, even when subgroup analysis was performed for clinical stage, duration of pathology, anatomical site of lymphedema, or type of microsurgical procedure. Further prospective trials with a common clearly defined outcome measure are warranted for an unbiased evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lymphology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lymphology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2458/lymph.4670\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lymphology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2458/lymph.4670","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

淋巴管吻合(LVA)已被描述为早期淋巴水肿(LE)的有效治疗方法。本研究的目的是通过进行荟萃分析来加深对LVA有效性的评估,以提供有关其在特定解剖部位、临床分期、淋巴水肿持续时间和手术技术中的实用性的信息。2019年11月,使用PubMed/Medline、Google Scholar和Cochrane数据库进行了系统的文献搜索。只有对人类原发性和/或继发性淋巴水肿仅进行LVA的原始研究才有资格进行数据提取。对具有明确终点的文章进行了荟萃分析,并对手术技术、淋巴水肿持续时间和病理分期进行了亚组分析。我们的荟萃分析包括48项研究,包括6项临床试验和42项低风险偏倚观察性研究。纳入1281名受试者,大多数文章报告了前后分析。淋巴结-淋巴结吻合似乎能有效治疗淋巴水肿,优势比为0.07(CI:0.04,0.13,p<0.001)。LVA的所有亚组荟萃分析都具有统计学意义,特别是在解剖部位、临床分期、LE持续时间方面,或显微外科手术类型(p<0.05)。我们的荟萃分析证实了LVA治疗淋巴水肿的疗效,即使对临床分期、病理持续时间、淋巴水肿解剖部位或显微外科治疗类型进行了亚组分析。进一步的前瞻性试验有一个共同的明确定义的结果衡量标准,有必要进行公正的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lymphovenous anastomosis for the treatment of lymphedema: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.
Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) has been described as an effective treatment for early stages of lymphedema (LE). The aim of this study was to deepen the evaluation of the effectiveness of LVA by performing a metaanalysis to provide information about its utility in specific anatomical sites, clinical stages, duration of lymphedema, and surgical technique. A systematic literature search using PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database was performed in November 2019. Only original studies in which exclusively LVA was performed for primary and/or secondary lymphedema in humans were eligible for data extraction. A meta-analysis was performed on articles with a well-defined endpoint and a subgroup analysis was conducted in relation to surgical technique, duration of lymphedema, stage of pathology. Forty-eight studies, including 6 clinical trials and 42 lowrisk bias observational studies were included in our meta-analysis. 1,281 subjects were included and the majority of articles reported a pre-post analysis. Lymphaticovenular anastomosis appears to result effectively in treatment of lymphedema with an odds ratio of 0.07 (CI: 0.04, 0.13, p<0.001). All subgroup metaanalyses were statistically significant for LVAs specifically with regard to anatomical site, clinical stage, duration of LE, or type of microsurgical procedure (p<0.05). Our meta-analysis confirmed the efficacy of LVAs for the treatment of lymphedema, even when subgroup analysis was performed for clinical stage, duration of pathology, anatomical site of lymphedema, or type of microsurgical procedure. Further prospective trials with a common clearly defined outcome measure are warranted for an unbiased evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lymphology
Lymphology 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal contains original articles, special features (see below), and information regarding the International Society of Lymphology. It seeks original papers dealing with clinical and basic studies of the lymphatic system and its disorders including related fields. Articles are accepted for external review and publication on the condition that they are contributed to Lymphology only and that no substantial part has been or will be published elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Multimodal Treatment of Chylous Fistula: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. Modified Lymphoscintigraphy in Primary Lymphatic Insufficiency of the Lower Limb. Underreporting and Underrepresentation of Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients in Lymphedema Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review. ISL NEWS Addition of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression to Conventional Treatment Improves Volume Reduction Before Lymphatic Surgery for Lower Limb Lymphedema: A Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1