用户响应诊断预报评估方法:在热带气旋预报中的应用

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Weather and Forecasting Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI:10.1175/waf-d-23-0072.1
Barbara Brown, Louisa Nance, Christopher Williams, Kathryn Newman, James Franklin, Edward Rappaport, Paul Kucera, Robert Gall
{"title":"用户响应诊断预报评估方法:在热带气旋预报中的应用","authors":"Barbara Brown, Louisa Nance, Christopher Williams, Kathryn Newman, James Franklin, Edward Rappaport, Paul Kucera, Robert Gall","doi":"10.1175/waf-d-23-0072.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project1 (HFIP) was established by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in 2007 with a goal of improving tropical cyclone (TC) track and intensity predictions. A major focus of HFIP has been to increase the quality of guidance products for these parameters that are available to forecasters at the National Weather Service National Hurricane Center (NWS/NHC). One HFIP effort involved the demonstration of an operational decision process, named Stream 1.5, in which promising experimental versions of numerical weather prediction models were selected for TC forecast guidance. The selection occurred every year from 2010–2014 in the period preceding the hurricane season (defined as August through October), and was based on an extensive verification exercise of retrospective TC forecasts from candidate experimental models run over previous hurricane seasons. As part of this process, user-responsive verification questions were identified via discussions between NHC staff and forecast verification experts, with additional questions considered each year. A suite of statistically meaningful verification approaches consisting of traditional and innovative methods was developed to respond to these questions. Two examples of the application of the Stream 1.5 evaluations are presented, and the benefits of this approach are discussed. These benefits include the ability to provide information to forecasters and others that is relevant for their decision-making processes, via the selection of models that meet forecast quality standards and are meaningful for demonstration to forecasters in the subsequent hurricane season; clarification of user-responsive strengths and weaknesses of the selected models; and identification of paths to model improvement.","PeriodicalId":49369,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Forecasting","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User-responsive diagnostic forecast evaluation approaches: Application to tropical cyclone predictions\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Brown, Louisa Nance, Christopher Williams, Kathryn Newman, James Franklin, Edward Rappaport, Paul Kucera, Robert Gall\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/waf-d-23-0072.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project1 (HFIP) was established by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in 2007 with a goal of improving tropical cyclone (TC) track and intensity predictions. A major focus of HFIP has been to increase the quality of guidance products for these parameters that are available to forecasters at the National Weather Service National Hurricane Center (NWS/NHC). One HFIP effort involved the demonstration of an operational decision process, named Stream 1.5, in which promising experimental versions of numerical weather prediction models were selected for TC forecast guidance. The selection occurred every year from 2010–2014 in the period preceding the hurricane season (defined as August through October), and was based on an extensive verification exercise of retrospective TC forecasts from candidate experimental models run over previous hurricane seasons. As part of this process, user-responsive verification questions were identified via discussions between NHC staff and forecast verification experts, with additional questions considered each year. A suite of statistically meaningful verification approaches consisting of traditional and innovative methods was developed to respond to these questions. Two examples of the application of the Stream 1.5 evaluations are presented, and the benefits of this approach are discussed. These benefits include the ability to provide information to forecasters and others that is relevant for their decision-making processes, via the selection of models that meet forecast quality standards and are meaningful for demonstration to forecasters in the subsequent hurricane season; clarification of user-responsive strengths and weaknesses of the selected models; and identification of paths to model improvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weather and Forecasting\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weather and Forecasting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-23-0072.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-23-0072.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

飓风预报改进项目1(HFIP)由美国国家海洋和大气管理局(NOAA)于2007年建立,旨在改进热带气旋(TC)的路径和强度预测。HFIP的一个主要重点是提高美国国家气象局国家飓风中心(NWS/NHC)预报员可获得的这些参数的指导产品的质量。HFIP的一项工作涉及一个名为Stream 1.5的操作决策过程的演示,在该过程中,选择了有前景的数值天气预测模型实验版本作为TC预测指南。从2010年到2014年,每年都会在飓风季(定义为8月到10月)之前进行选择,并基于对前几个飓风季的候选实验模型的TC预测进行的广泛验证。作为这一过程的一部分,通过NHC工作人员和预测验证专家之间的讨论,确定了用户响应验证问题,每年都会考虑其他问题。针对这些问题,开发了一套由传统和创新方法组成的具有统计意义的验证方法。介绍了Stream 1.5评估的两个应用实例,并讨论了这种方法的好处。这些好处包括能够通过选择符合预报质量标准的模型,向预报员和其他人提供与其决策过程相关的信息,并有助于在随后的飓风季节向预报员进行演示;澄清所选模型的用户响应优势和劣势;以及确定改进模型的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
User-responsive diagnostic forecast evaluation approaches: Application to tropical cyclone predictions
The Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project1 (HFIP) was established by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in 2007 with a goal of improving tropical cyclone (TC) track and intensity predictions. A major focus of HFIP has been to increase the quality of guidance products for these parameters that are available to forecasters at the National Weather Service National Hurricane Center (NWS/NHC). One HFIP effort involved the demonstration of an operational decision process, named Stream 1.5, in which promising experimental versions of numerical weather prediction models were selected for TC forecast guidance. The selection occurred every year from 2010–2014 in the period preceding the hurricane season (defined as August through October), and was based on an extensive verification exercise of retrospective TC forecasts from candidate experimental models run over previous hurricane seasons. As part of this process, user-responsive verification questions were identified via discussions between NHC staff and forecast verification experts, with additional questions considered each year. A suite of statistically meaningful verification approaches consisting of traditional and innovative methods was developed to respond to these questions. Two examples of the application of the Stream 1.5 evaluations are presented, and the benefits of this approach are discussed. These benefits include the ability to provide information to forecasters and others that is relevant for their decision-making processes, via the selection of models that meet forecast quality standards and are meaningful for demonstration to forecasters in the subsequent hurricane season; clarification of user-responsive strengths and weaknesses of the selected models; and identification of paths to model improvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Weather and Forecasting
Weather and Forecasting 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
17.20%
发文量
131
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Weather and Forecasting (WAF) (ISSN: 0882-8156; eISSN: 1520-0434) publishes research that is relevant to operational forecasting. This includes papers on significant weather events, forecasting techniques, forecast verification, model parameterizations, data assimilation, model ensembles, statistical postprocessing techniques, the transfer of research results to the forecasting community, and the societal use and value of forecasts. The scope of WAF includes research relevant to forecast lead times ranging from short-term “nowcasts” through seasonal time scales out to approximately two years.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Analysis Correction-based Additive Inflation on subseasonal tropical prediction in the Navy Earth System Prediction Capability Comparison of Clustering Approaches in a Multi-Model Ensemble for U.S. East Coast Cold Season Extratropical Cyclones Collaborative Exploration of Storm-Scale Probabilistic Guidance for NWS Forecast Operations Verification of the Global Forecast System, North American Mesoscale Forecast System, and High-Resolution Rapid Refresh Model Near-Surface Forecasts by use of the New York State Mesonet The influence of time varying sea-ice concentration on Antarctic and Southern Ocean numerical weather prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1