交叉试验中基于似然性的缺失数据分析

IF 0.6 4区 数学 Q4 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics Pub Date : 2021-03-11 DOI:10.1214/23-bjps570
S. Pareek, K. Das, S. Mukhopadhyay
{"title":"交叉试验中基于似然性的缺失数据分析","authors":"S. Pareek, K. Das, S. Mukhopadhyay","doi":"10.1214/23-bjps570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A multivariate mixed-effects model seems to be the most appropriate for gene expression data collected in a crossover trial. It is, however, difficult to obtain reliable results using standard statistical inference when some responses are missing. Particularly for crossover studies, missingness is a serious concern as the trial requires a small number of participants. A Monte Carlo EM (MCEM)-based technique was adopted to deal with this situation. In addition to estimation, MCEM likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) are developed to test fixed effects in crossover models with missing data. Intensive simulation studies were conducted prior to analyzing gene expression data.","PeriodicalId":51242,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Likelihood-based missing data analysis in crossover trials\",\"authors\":\"S. Pareek, K. Das, S. Mukhopadhyay\",\"doi\":\"10.1214/23-bjps570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A multivariate mixed-effects model seems to be the most appropriate for gene expression data collected in a crossover trial. It is, however, difficult to obtain reliable results using standard statistical inference when some responses are missing. Particularly for crossover studies, missingness is a serious concern as the trial requires a small number of participants. A Monte Carlo EM (MCEM)-based technique was adopted to deal with this situation. In addition to estimation, MCEM likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) are developed to test fixed effects in crossover models with missing data. Intensive simulation studies were conducted prior to analyzing gene expression data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1214/23-bjps570\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1214/23-bjps570","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

多变量混合效应模型似乎最适合交叉试验中收集的基因表达数据。然而,当某些响应缺失时,使用标准统计推断很难获得可靠的结果。特别是对于交叉研究,缺失是一个严重的问题,因为试验需要少量的参与者。采用蒙特卡罗电磁法(MCEM)来处理这种情况。除了估计之外,MCEM似然比检验(LRTs)被开发用于检验缺失数据的交叉模型中的固定效应。在分析基因表达数据之前,进行了密集的模拟研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Likelihood-based missing data analysis in crossover trials
A multivariate mixed-effects model seems to be the most appropriate for gene expression data collected in a crossover trial. It is, however, difficult to obtain reliable results using standard statistical inference when some responses are missing. Particularly for crossover studies, missingness is a serious concern as the trial requires a small number of participants. A Monte Carlo EM (MCEM)-based technique was adopted to deal with this situation. In addition to estimation, MCEM likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) are developed to test fixed effects in crossover models with missing data. Intensive simulation studies were conducted prior to analyzing gene expression data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics aims to publish high quality research papers in applied probability, applied statistics, computational statistics, mathematical statistics, probability theory and stochastic processes. More specifically, the following types of contributions will be considered: (i) Original articles dealing with methodological developments, comparison of competing techniques or their computational aspects. (ii) Original articles developing theoretical results. (iii) Articles that contain novel applications of existing methodologies to practical problems. For these papers the focus is in the importance and originality of the applied problem, as well as, applications of the best available methodologies to solve it. (iv) Survey articles containing a thorough coverage of topics of broad interest to probability and statistics. The journal will occasionally publish book reviews, invited papers and essays on the teaching of statistics.
期刊最新文献
Multivariate zero-inflated Bell–Touchard distribution for multivariate counts: An application to COVID-related data Unit gamma regression models for correlated bounded data Two-stage Walsh-average-based robust estimation and variable selection for partially linear additive spatial autoregressive models On quasi Pólya thinning operator Divide-and-conquer Metropolis–Hastings samplers with matched samples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1