Luis Ortiz-Reyes, Jayshil J Patel, Xuran Jiang, Angel Coz Yataco, Andrew G Day, Faraaz Shah, James Zelten, Maximiliano Tamae-Kakazu, Todd Rice, Daren K Heyland
{"title":"机械通气伴循环休克患者早期与延迟肠内营养:一项国际多中心实用临床试验的嵌套队列分析","authors":"Luis Ortiz-Reyes, Jayshil J Patel, Xuran Jiang, Angel Coz Yataco, Andrew G Day, Faraaz Shah, James Zelten, Maximiliano Tamae-Kakazu, Todd Rice, Daren K Heyland","doi":"10.1186/s13054-022-04047-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Real-world evidence on the timing and efficacy of enteral nutrition (EN) practices in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with circulatory shock is limited. We hypothesized early EN (EEN), as compared to delayed EN (DEN), is associated with improved clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated (MV) patients with circulatory shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed a dataset from an international, multicenter, pragmatic randomized clinical trial (RCT) evaluating protein dose in ICU patients. Data were collected from ICU admission, and EEN was defined as initiating < 48 h from ICU admission and DEN > 48 h. We identified MV patients in circulatory shock to evaluate the association between the timing of EN initiation and clinical outcomes. The regression analysis model controlled for age, mNUTRIC score, APACHE II score, sepsis, and Site.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 626 patients, from 52 ICUs in 14 countries. Median age was 60 years [18-93], 55% had septic shock, 99% received norepinephrine alone, 91% received EN alone, and 50.3% were randomized to a usual protein dose. Forty-two percent of EEN patients had persistent organ dysfunction syndrome plus death at day 28, compared to 53% in the DEN group (p = 0.04). EEN was associated with more ICU-free days (9.3 ± 9.2 vs. 5.7 ± 7.9, p = 0.0002), more days alive and free of vasopressors (7.1 ± 3.1 vs. 6.3 ± 3.2, p = 0.007), and shorter duration of MV among survivors (9.8 ± 10.9 vs. 13.8 ± 14.5, p = 0.0002). This trend was no longer observed in the adjusted analysis. There were no differences in ICU/60-day mortality or feeding intolerance rates between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In MV patients with circulatory shock, EEN, as compared to DEN, was associated with improved clinical outcomes, but no longer when adjusting for illness severity. RCTs comparing the efficacy of EEN to DEN in MV patients with circulatory shock are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":92888,"journal":{"name":"Critical care (Houten, Netherlands)","volume":" ","pages":"173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9185884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early versus delayed enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated patients with circulatory shock: a nested cohort analysis of an international multicenter, pragmatic clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Luis Ortiz-Reyes, Jayshil J Patel, Xuran Jiang, Angel Coz Yataco, Andrew G Day, Faraaz Shah, James Zelten, Maximiliano Tamae-Kakazu, Todd Rice, Daren K Heyland\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13054-022-04047-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Real-world evidence on the timing and efficacy of enteral nutrition (EN) practices in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with circulatory shock is limited. We hypothesized early EN (EEN), as compared to delayed EN (DEN), is associated with improved clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated (MV) patients with circulatory shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed a dataset from an international, multicenter, pragmatic randomized clinical trial (RCT) evaluating protein dose in ICU patients. Data were collected from ICU admission, and EEN was defined as initiating < 48 h from ICU admission and DEN > 48 h. We identified MV patients in circulatory shock to evaluate the association between the timing of EN initiation and clinical outcomes. The regression analysis model controlled for age, mNUTRIC score, APACHE II score, sepsis, and Site.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 626 patients, from 52 ICUs in 14 countries. Median age was 60 years [18-93], 55% had septic shock, 99% received norepinephrine alone, 91% received EN alone, and 50.3% were randomized to a usual protein dose. Forty-two percent of EEN patients had persistent organ dysfunction syndrome plus death at day 28, compared to 53% in the DEN group (p = 0.04). EEN was associated with more ICU-free days (9.3 ± 9.2 vs. 5.7 ± 7.9, p = 0.0002), more days alive and free of vasopressors (7.1 ± 3.1 vs. 6.3 ± 3.2, p = 0.007), and shorter duration of MV among survivors (9.8 ± 10.9 vs. 13.8 ± 14.5, p = 0.0002). This trend was no longer observed in the adjusted analysis. There were no differences in ICU/60-day mortality or feeding intolerance rates between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In MV patients with circulatory shock, EEN, as compared to DEN, was associated with improved clinical outcomes, but no longer when adjusting for illness severity. RCTs comparing the efficacy of EEN to DEN in MV patients with circulatory shock are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care (Houten, Netherlands)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9185884/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care (Houten, Netherlands)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04047-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care (Houten, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04047-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
引言:关于重症监护病房(ICU)患者循环休克的肠内营养(EN)的时机和疗效的实际证据是有限的。我们假设早期EN (EEN)与延迟EN (DEN)相比,与机械通气(MV)伴循环休克患者的临床结果改善有关。方法:我们分析了一项国际、多中心、实用的随机临床试验(RCT)的数据集,该试验评估了ICU患者的蛋白质剂量。数据收集自ICU入院时,并将起始时间定义为48小时。我们确定了发生循环性休克的MV患者,以评估起始时间与临床结果之间的关系。回归分析模型控制了年龄、mNUTRIC评分、APACHE II评分、败血症和部位。结果:我们纳入了来自14个国家的52个icu的626例患者。中位年龄为60岁[18-93],55%发生脓毒性休克,99%单独接受去甲肾上腺素治疗,91%单独接受EN治疗,50.3%随机接受常规蛋白剂量。42%的EEN患者在第28天出现持续的器官功能障碍综合征并死亡,而DEN组为53% (p = 0.04)。EEN与更多的无icu天数(9.3±9.2 vs. 5.7±7.9,p = 0.0002),更多的存活和无血管加压剂天数(7.1±3.1 vs. 6.3±3.2,p = 0.007)以及更短的存活时间(9.8±10.9 vs. 13.8±14.5,p = 0.0002)相关。在调整后的分析中不再观察到这一趋势。两组间ICU/60天死亡率和喂养不耐受率无差异。结论:在MV合并循环休克的患者中,与DEN相比,EEN与改善的临床结果相关,但在调整疾病严重程度时不再相关。比较en和DEN对中压患者循环休克疗效的随机对照试验是有根据的。
Early versus delayed enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated patients with circulatory shock: a nested cohort analysis of an international multicenter, pragmatic clinical trial.
Introduction: Real-world evidence on the timing and efficacy of enteral nutrition (EN) practices in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with circulatory shock is limited. We hypothesized early EN (EEN), as compared to delayed EN (DEN), is associated with improved clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated (MV) patients with circulatory shock.
Methods: We analyzed a dataset from an international, multicenter, pragmatic randomized clinical trial (RCT) evaluating protein dose in ICU patients. Data were collected from ICU admission, and EEN was defined as initiating < 48 h from ICU admission and DEN > 48 h. We identified MV patients in circulatory shock to evaluate the association between the timing of EN initiation and clinical outcomes. The regression analysis model controlled for age, mNUTRIC score, APACHE II score, sepsis, and Site.
Results: We included 626 patients, from 52 ICUs in 14 countries. Median age was 60 years [18-93], 55% had septic shock, 99% received norepinephrine alone, 91% received EN alone, and 50.3% were randomized to a usual protein dose. Forty-two percent of EEN patients had persistent organ dysfunction syndrome plus death at day 28, compared to 53% in the DEN group (p = 0.04). EEN was associated with more ICU-free days (9.3 ± 9.2 vs. 5.7 ± 7.9, p = 0.0002), more days alive and free of vasopressors (7.1 ± 3.1 vs. 6.3 ± 3.2, p = 0.007), and shorter duration of MV among survivors (9.8 ± 10.9 vs. 13.8 ± 14.5, p = 0.0002). This trend was no longer observed in the adjusted analysis. There were no differences in ICU/60-day mortality or feeding intolerance rates between groups.
Conclusion: In MV patients with circulatory shock, EEN, as compared to DEN, was associated with improved clinical outcomes, but no longer when adjusting for illness severity. RCTs comparing the efficacy of EEN to DEN in MV patients with circulatory shock are warranted.