IV、 关注新研究

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Britannia Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1017/S0068113X22000344
{"title":"IV、 关注新研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/S0068113X22000344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Weald of Sussex was one of the major sources of iron in Britain. However, questions still remain regarding the organisation and control of such production sites in the Roman era. This thesis explores the social organisation of Roman-period iron production through the investigation, analysis and discussion of two case studies located at Chitcombe and Standen. The research identifies and interprets archaeological features, particularly deposits of technological waste, to look at the processes of iron production, the role of the sites within the wider landscape, their connectivity and level of influence. In summary, the scale of iron-production sites across the Weald was found to vary greatly. Chitcombe is identified as a large-scale industrial iron-production site most likely under military control, with evidence for high-level spatial planning with distinct areas for smelting activities and workshops. Standen, meanwhile, represents a small-scale site with evidence for a much lower intensity of smelting and no indication of control or organisation. Coupled with a programme of excavation, the application of a multi-faceted geo-prospection methodology, incorporating magnetometry, electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), induced polarisation (IP) and electromagnetic surveys, offering both horizontal and vertical images of the sites, is shown to offer an understanding of waste deposits as a whole. The strategy designed for the investigations of these sites has created a system of repeatable and comparable datasets that can be built upon with further studies.","PeriodicalId":44906,"journal":{"name":"Britannia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IV. SPOTLIGHT ON NEW RESEARCH\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0068113X22000344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Weald of Sussex was one of the major sources of iron in Britain. However, questions still remain regarding the organisation and control of such production sites in the Roman era. This thesis explores the social organisation of Roman-period iron production through the investigation, analysis and discussion of two case studies located at Chitcombe and Standen. The research identifies and interprets archaeological features, particularly deposits of technological waste, to look at the processes of iron production, the role of the sites within the wider landscape, their connectivity and level of influence. In summary, the scale of iron-production sites across the Weald was found to vary greatly. Chitcombe is identified as a large-scale industrial iron-production site most likely under military control, with evidence for high-level spatial planning with distinct areas for smelting activities and workshops. Standen, meanwhile, represents a small-scale site with evidence for a much lower intensity of smelting and no indication of control or organisation. Coupled with a programme of excavation, the application of a multi-faceted geo-prospection methodology, incorporating magnetometry, electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), induced polarisation (IP) and electromagnetic surveys, offering both horizontal and vertical images of the sites, is shown to offer an understanding of waste deposits as a whole. The strategy designed for the investigations of these sites has created a system of repeatable and comparable datasets that can be built upon with further studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Britannia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Britannia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068113X22000344\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Britannia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068113X22000344","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

苏塞克斯郡是英国主要的铁产地之一。然而,关于罗马时代这些生产基地的组织和控制问题仍然存在。本文通过对位于奇库姆和斯坦登的两个案例的调查、分析和讨论,探讨了罗马时期铁生产的社会组织。该研究确定并解释了考古特征,特别是技术废物的沉积物,以研究铁生产过程、遗址在更广泛景观中的作用、它们的连通性和影响程度。总之,研究发现,整个Weald地区的铁生产地规模差异很大。Chitcombe被认为是一个大规模的工业铁生产基地,很可能处于军事控制之下,有证据表明,这里有高水平的空间规划,有冶炼活动和车间的不同区域。与此同时,斯坦登是一个小规模的遗址,有证据表明冶炼强度要低得多,没有迹象表明有控制或组织。再加上挖掘计划,应用多方面的地质勘探方法,包括磁力计、电阻率断层扫描(ERT)、感应极化(IP)和电磁测量,提供这些地点的水平和垂直图像,显示出对废物沉积物的整体了解。为这些地点的调查设计的策略已经创建了一个可重复和可比较的数据集系统,可以建立在进一步研究的基础上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IV. SPOTLIGHT ON NEW RESEARCH
The Weald of Sussex was one of the major sources of iron in Britain. However, questions still remain regarding the organisation and control of such production sites in the Roman era. This thesis explores the social organisation of Roman-period iron production through the investigation, analysis and discussion of two case studies located at Chitcombe and Standen. The research identifies and interprets archaeological features, particularly deposits of technological waste, to look at the processes of iron production, the role of the sites within the wider landscape, their connectivity and level of influence. In summary, the scale of iron-production sites across the Weald was found to vary greatly. Chitcombe is identified as a large-scale industrial iron-production site most likely under military control, with evidence for high-level spatial planning with distinct areas for smelting activities and workshops. Standen, meanwhile, represents a small-scale site with evidence for a much lower intensity of smelting and no indication of control or organisation. Coupled with a programme of excavation, the application of a multi-faceted geo-prospection methodology, incorporating magnetometry, electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), induced polarisation (IP) and electromagnetic surveys, offering both horizontal and vertical images of the sites, is shown to offer an understanding of waste deposits as a whole. The strategy designed for the investigations of these sites has created a system of repeatable and comparable datasets that can be built upon with further studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Britannia
Britannia Multiple-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
50.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
50 Finds from Somerset: Objects from The Portable Antiquities Scheme. By L. Burnett. Amberley Press, Stroud, 2023. Pp. 96, illus. Price £15.99. isbn 9781445662367. Corpus Signorum Imperii Romani. Great Britain. Vol. 1, Fasc. 11. The Hinterland of Hadrian's Wall and Derbyshire. By Lindsay Allason-Jones. Oxford University Press/British Academy, Oxford, 2023. Pp. xlviii + 206, illus. Price £105. isbn 9780197266892. Villas, Sanctuaries and Settlements in the Romano-British Countryside. Edited by M. Henig, G. Soffe, K. Adcock and A. King. Archaeopress Roman Archaeology 95. Archaeopress, Oxford, 2022. Pp. xii + 368 pp., illus. Price £58. isbn 978803273808, issn 9781803273815 (ePDF). Mosaics in Roman Britain. By A. Beeson. Amberley Publishing, Stroud, 2022. Pp. 96, illus. Price £15.99. isbn 9781445689883 (print), 9781445689890 (ebook). Roman Religion in the Danubian Provinces: Space Sacralisation and Religious Communication During the Principate (1st–3rd Century AD). By C. Szabó. Oxbow, Oxford & Philadelphia, 2022. Pp. xiii + 298, illus. Price £38. isbn 9781789257830; 9781789257847 (eBook).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1