山地森林地上生物量GEDI波形的斜率自适应度量评估

遥感学报 Pub Date : 2021-08-27 DOI:10.34133/2021/9805364
W. Ni, Zhiyu Zhang, G. Sun
{"title":"山地森林地上生物量GEDI波形的斜率自适应度量评估","authors":"W. Ni, Zhiyu Zhang, G. Sun","doi":"10.34133/2021/9805364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Waveform broadening effects of large-footprint lidar caused by terrain slopes are still a great challenge limiting the estimation accuracy of forest aboveground biomass (AGB) over mountainous areas. Slope-adaptive metrics of waveforms were proposed in our previous studies. However, its validation was limited by the unavailability of enough reference data. This study made full validation of slope-adaptive metrics using data acquired by the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) mission, meanwhile exploring GEDI waveforms on estimations of forest AGB. Three types of waveform metrics were employed, including slope-adaptive metrics (RHT), typical height metrics relative to ground peaks (RH), and waveform parameters (WP). In addition to terrain slopes, two other factors were also explored including the geolocation issue and signal start and ending points of waveforms. Results showed that footprint geolocations in the first version GEDI data products were shifted to the left forward of nominal geolocations with a distance of about 24 m~30 m and were substantially corrected in the second version; the fourth and fifth groups of signal start and ending points of waveforms had worse performance than the rest of the four groups because they used the maximum and minimum signal thresholds, respectively. Taking airborne laser scanner (ALS) data as reference, the root mean square error (RMSE) of terrain slopes extracted from the digital elevation model of the shuttle radar topography mission (SRTM DEM) was about 3°. The coefficients of determination (R2) of estimation models of forest AGB based on RH metrics were improved from 0.48 to 0.68 with RMSE decreased from 19.7 Mg/ha to 15.4 Mg/ha by the second version geolocations. The RHT and WP metrics gave the best and the worst estimation accuracy, respectively. RHT further improved R2 to 0.77 and decreased RMSE to 13.0 Mg/ha using terrain slopes extracted from SRTM DEM with a resolution of 1 arc second. R2 of estimation models based on RHT was finally improved to 0.8 with RMSE decreased to 11.7 Mg/ha using exact terrain slopes from ALS data. This study demonstrated the great potential of slope-adaptive metrics of GEDI waveforms on estimations of forest aboveground biomass over mountainous areas.","PeriodicalId":38304,"journal":{"name":"遥感学报","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Slope-Adaptive Metrics of GEDI Waveforms for Estimations of Forest Aboveground Biomass over Mountainous Areas\",\"authors\":\"W. Ni, Zhiyu Zhang, G. Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.34133/2021/9805364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Waveform broadening effects of large-footprint lidar caused by terrain slopes are still a great challenge limiting the estimation accuracy of forest aboveground biomass (AGB) over mountainous areas. Slope-adaptive metrics of waveforms were proposed in our previous studies. However, its validation was limited by the unavailability of enough reference data. This study made full validation of slope-adaptive metrics using data acquired by the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) mission, meanwhile exploring GEDI waveforms on estimations of forest AGB. Three types of waveform metrics were employed, including slope-adaptive metrics (RHT), typical height metrics relative to ground peaks (RH), and waveform parameters (WP). In addition to terrain slopes, two other factors were also explored including the geolocation issue and signal start and ending points of waveforms. Results showed that footprint geolocations in the first version GEDI data products were shifted to the left forward of nominal geolocations with a distance of about 24 m~30 m and were substantially corrected in the second version; the fourth and fifth groups of signal start and ending points of waveforms had worse performance than the rest of the four groups because they used the maximum and minimum signal thresholds, respectively. Taking airborne laser scanner (ALS) data as reference, the root mean square error (RMSE) of terrain slopes extracted from the digital elevation model of the shuttle radar topography mission (SRTM DEM) was about 3°. The coefficients of determination (R2) of estimation models of forest AGB based on RH metrics were improved from 0.48 to 0.68 with RMSE decreased from 19.7 Mg/ha to 15.4 Mg/ha by the second version geolocations. The RHT and WP metrics gave the best and the worst estimation accuracy, respectively. RHT further improved R2 to 0.77 and decreased RMSE to 13.0 Mg/ha using terrain slopes extracted from SRTM DEM with a resolution of 1 arc second. R2 of estimation models based on RHT was finally improved to 0.8 with RMSE decreased to 11.7 Mg/ha using exact terrain slopes from ALS data. This study demonstrated the great potential of slope-adaptive metrics of GEDI waveforms on estimations of forest aboveground biomass over mountainous areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"遥感学报\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"遥感学报\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/9805364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"遥感学报","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/9805364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

地形斜坡引起的大足迹激光雷达的波形加宽效应仍然是限制山区森林地上生物量估计精度的一大挑战。在我们之前的研究中提出了波形的斜率自适应度量。然而,由于没有足够的参考数据,其验证受到限制。本研究利用全球生态系统动力学调查(GEDI)任务获得的数据对坡度自适应指标进行了充分验证,同时探索了GEDI波形对森林AGB的估计。采用了三种类型的波形度量,包括斜率自适应度量(RHT)、相对于地峰的典型高度度量(RH)和波形参数(WP)。除了地形坡度外,还探讨了其他两个因素,包括地理位置问题和波形的信号起点和终点。结果显示,第一个版本GEDI数据产品中的足迹地理位置被转移到标称地理位置的左前方,距离约为24 m~30 m,并且在第二版本中被基本校正;第四组和第五组波形的信号起点和终点的性能比四组中的其余组差,因为它们分别使用了最大和最小信号阈值。以机载激光扫描仪(ALS)数据为参考,从航天飞机雷达地形任务(SRTM DEM)的数字高程模型中提取的地形坡度均方根误差(RMSE)约为3°。基于RH指标的森林AGB估计模型的确定系数(R2)从0.48提高到0.68,RMSE从19.7降低 Mg/ha至15.4 Mg/ha由第二版本地理位置决定。RHT和WP度量分别给出了最佳和最差的估计精度。RHT将R2进一步提高到0.77,RMSE降低到13.0 Mg/ha,使用从SRTM DEM中提取的地形坡度,分辨率为1弧秒。基于RHT的估计模型的R2最终提高到0.8,RMSE降低到11.7 Mg/ha,使用ALS数据中的精确地形坡度。本研究证明了GEDI波形的斜率自适应指标在估计山区森林地上生物量方面的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Slope-Adaptive Metrics of GEDI Waveforms for Estimations of Forest Aboveground Biomass over Mountainous Areas
Waveform broadening effects of large-footprint lidar caused by terrain slopes are still a great challenge limiting the estimation accuracy of forest aboveground biomass (AGB) over mountainous areas. Slope-adaptive metrics of waveforms were proposed in our previous studies. However, its validation was limited by the unavailability of enough reference data. This study made full validation of slope-adaptive metrics using data acquired by the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) mission, meanwhile exploring GEDI waveforms on estimations of forest AGB. Three types of waveform metrics were employed, including slope-adaptive metrics (RHT), typical height metrics relative to ground peaks (RH), and waveform parameters (WP). In addition to terrain slopes, two other factors were also explored including the geolocation issue and signal start and ending points of waveforms. Results showed that footprint geolocations in the first version GEDI data products were shifted to the left forward of nominal geolocations with a distance of about 24 m~30 m and were substantially corrected in the second version; the fourth and fifth groups of signal start and ending points of waveforms had worse performance than the rest of the four groups because they used the maximum and minimum signal thresholds, respectively. Taking airborne laser scanner (ALS) data as reference, the root mean square error (RMSE) of terrain slopes extracted from the digital elevation model of the shuttle radar topography mission (SRTM DEM) was about 3°. The coefficients of determination (R2) of estimation models of forest AGB based on RH metrics were improved from 0.48 to 0.68 with RMSE decreased from 19.7 Mg/ha to 15.4 Mg/ha by the second version geolocations. The RHT and WP metrics gave the best and the worst estimation accuracy, respectively. RHT further improved R2 to 0.77 and decreased RMSE to 13.0 Mg/ha using terrain slopes extracted from SRTM DEM with a resolution of 1 arc second. R2 of estimation models based on RHT was finally improved to 0.8 with RMSE decreased to 11.7 Mg/ha using exact terrain slopes from ALS data. This study demonstrated the great potential of slope-adaptive metrics of GEDI waveforms on estimations of forest aboveground biomass over mountainous areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
遥感学报
遥感学报 Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3200
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Combining solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and optical vegetation indices to better understand plant phenological responses to global change Simulating potential tree height for beech-maple-birch forests in northeastern United States on Google Earth Engine Globe230k: A benchmark dense-pixel annotation dataset for global land cover mapping Urban renewal mapping: A case study in Beijing from 2000 to 2020 Improved fine-scale tropical forest cover mapping for Southeast Asia using Planet-NICFI and Sentinel-1 imagery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1