{"title":"可公开访问的数据集的法律保护的资格要求","authors":"Guobin Cui","doi":"10.1080/17579961.2022.2047524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article proceeds on the assumption that Chinese legislators are likely to choose special legislation of a property rights regime to protect publicly accessible datasets. Under such legislation, data collectors would be granted limited exclusive rights (right of public communication). It is argued that there should be three principal eligibility requirements in relation to such datasets, namely: the data entries in a dataset are made public; it contains a substantial number of data entries; and, it reflects a substantial collection cost to the collector. Through these elements, the special property rights legislation can be connected consistently with the existing trade secret protection system and copyright law. It can be distinguished from the US-style hot news doctrine and EU-style database directive to achieve different legislative purposes and effectively balance the interests of data collectors, competitors, and the public.","PeriodicalId":37639,"journal":{"name":"Law, Innovation and Technology","volume":"14 1","pages":"157 - 203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The eligibility requirements for legal protection of publicly accessible datasets\",\"authors\":\"Guobin Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17579961.2022.2047524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article proceeds on the assumption that Chinese legislators are likely to choose special legislation of a property rights regime to protect publicly accessible datasets. Under such legislation, data collectors would be granted limited exclusive rights (right of public communication). It is argued that there should be three principal eligibility requirements in relation to such datasets, namely: the data entries in a dataset are made public; it contains a substantial number of data entries; and, it reflects a substantial collection cost to the collector. Through these elements, the special property rights legislation can be connected consistently with the existing trade secret protection system and copyright law. It can be distinguished from the US-style hot news doctrine and EU-style database directive to achieve different legislative purposes and effectively balance the interests of data collectors, competitors, and the public.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law, Innovation and Technology\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"157 - 203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law, Innovation and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2022.2047524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law, Innovation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2022.2047524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
The eligibility requirements for legal protection of publicly accessible datasets
ABSTRACT This article proceeds on the assumption that Chinese legislators are likely to choose special legislation of a property rights regime to protect publicly accessible datasets. Under such legislation, data collectors would be granted limited exclusive rights (right of public communication). It is argued that there should be three principal eligibility requirements in relation to such datasets, namely: the data entries in a dataset are made public; it contains a substantial number of data entries; and, it reflects a substantial collection cost to the collector. Through these elements, the special property rights legislation can be connected consistently with the existing trade secret protection system and copyright law. It can be distinguished from the US-style hot news doctrine and EU-style database directive to achieve different legislative purposes and effectively balance the interests of data collectors, competitors, and the public.
期刊介绍:
Stem cell research, cloning, GMOs ... How do regulations affect such emerging technologies? What impact do new technologies have on law? And can we rely on technology itself as a regulatory tool? The meeting of law and technology is rapidly becoming an increasingly significant (and controversial) topic. Law, Innovation and Technology is, however, the only journal to engage fully with it, setting an innovative and distinctive agenda for lawyers, ethicists and policy makers. Spanning ICTs, biotechnologies, nanotechnologies, neurotechnologies, robotics and AI, it offers a unique forum for the highest level of reflection on this essential area.