无承压含水层单抽井稳流导水系数区间解析表达式

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology Pub Date : 2023-02-10 DOI:10.1144/qjegh2022-086
Guiming Dong, Jianing Li, Wenjie Chen, Juan Tian, Yanhui Wang
{"title":"无承压含水层单抽井稳流导水系数区间解析表达式","authors":"Guiming Dong, Jianing Li, Wenjie Chen, Juan Tian, Yanhui Wang","doi":"10.1144/qjegh2022-086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Results of pumping test are normally uncertain due to insufficient exploration capability and complex hydrogeological conditions, which poses a question as to how to calculate the range of hydraulic conductivity, if the factors affecting the hydraulic conductivity fluctuate within a range. In this paper, the parameters affecting the hydraulic conductivity were regarded as a range, which is called intervals. From this perspective, three analytical expressions which could quickly calculate the intervals of hydraulic conductivity specifically for unconfined aquifer with single well were derived through Dupuit-Forchheimer formula from three universal expressions. The relative errors of the three expressions were analyzed by comparing them with that of equal interval continuous sampling method (EICSM). The results indicated that on the premise that the absolute value of the relative error of the hydraulic conductivity extremum was controlled within 10%, the maximums and minimums should be calculated by Expression 2 (convex model formula) and Expression 3 (Taylor expansion formula) respectively. They were considered as better choices because the allowable change rate could reach 20% and 10%. At the end of the research, an actual pumping test was introduced to verify the above deduction.","PeriodicalId":20937,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytic Expressions of Hydraulic Conductivity Intervals for Steady Flow to the Single Pumping Well in Unconfined Aquifer\",\"authors\":\"Guiming Dong, Jianing Li, Wenjie Chen, Juan Tian, Yanhui Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1144/qjegh2022-086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Results of pumping test are normally uncertain due to insufficient exploration capability and complex hydrogeological conditions, which poses a question as to how to calculate the range of hydraulic conductivity, if the factors affecting the hydraulic conductivity fluctuate within a range. In this paper, the parameters affecting the hydraulic conductivity were regarded as a range, which is called intervals. From this perspective, three analytical expressions which could quickly calculate the intervals of hydraulic conductivity specifically for unconfined aquifer with single well were derived through Dupuit-Forchheimer formula from three universal expressions. The relative errors of the three expressions were analyzed by comparing them with that of equal interval continuous sampling method (EICSM). The results indicated that on the premise that the absolute value of the relative error of the hydraulic conductivity extremum was controlled within 10%, the maximums and minimums should be calculated by Expression 2 (convex model formula) and Expression 3 (Taylor expansion formula) respectively. They were considered as better choices because the allowable change rate could reach 20% and 10%. At the end of the research, an actual pumping test was introduced to verify the above deduction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2022-086\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2022-086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于勘探能力不足和水文地质条件复杂,抽水试验的结果通常是不确定的,这就提出了一个问题,即如果影响导水率的因素在一个范围内波动,如何计算导水率范围。本文将影响导水率的参数视为一个范围,称为区间。从这个角度出发,利用Dupuit-Forchheimer公式,从三个通用表达式中导出了三个可以快速计算单井无侧限含水层导水率区间的解析表达式。通过与等间隔连续采样法(EICSM)的比较,分析了三种表达式的相对误差。结果表明,在导水率极值相对误差绝对值控制在10%以内的前提下,应分别用表达式2(凸模型公式)和表达式3(泰勒展开公式)计算导水率的最大值和最小值。它们被认为是更好的选择,因为允许的变化率可以达到20%和10%。在研究的最后,介绍了一个实际的抽水试验来验证上述推导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analytic Expressions of Hydraulic Conductivity Intervals for Steady Flow to the Single Pumping Well in Unconfined Aquifer
Results of pumping test are normally uncertain due to insufficient exploration capability and complex hydrogeological conditions, which poses a question as to how to calculate the range of hydraulic conductivity, if the factors affecting the hydraulic conductivity fluctuate within a range. In this paper, the parameters affecting the hydraulic conductivity were regarded as a range, which is called intervals. From this perspective, three analytical expressions which could quickly calculate the intervals of hydraulic conductivity specifically for unconfined aquifer with single well were derived through Dupuit-Forchheimer formula from three universal expressions. The relative errors of the three expressions were analyzed by comparing them with that of equal interval continuous sampling method (EICSM). The results indicated that on the premise that the absolute value of the relative error of the hydraulic conductivity extremum was controlled within 10%, the maximums and minimums should be calculated by Expression 2 (convex model formula) and Expression 3 (Taylor expansion formula) respectively. They were considered as better choices because the allowable change rate could reach 20% and 10%. At the end of the research, an actual pumping test was introduced to verify the above deduction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology is owned by the Geological Society of London and published by the Geological Society Publishing House. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology (QJEGH) is an established peer reviewed international journal featuring papers on geology as applied to civil engineering mining practice and water resources. Papers are invited from, and about, all areas of the world on engineering geology and hydrogeology topics. This includes but is not limited to: applied geophysics, engineering geomorphology, environmental geology, hydrogeology, groundwater quality, ground source heat, contaminated land, waste management, land use planning, geotechnics, rock mechanics, geomaterials and geological hazards. The journal publishes the prestigious Glossop and Ineson lectures, research papers, case studies, review articles, technical notes, photographic features, thematic sets, discussion papers, editorial opinion and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Managing a potential conflict between the protection of geological sites and the need to safeguard essential road infrastructure: the Coverack North Coast Protection Scheme and palaeo-Moho in Cornwall, UK What is a Geohazard? The influence of earthworks construction on pore water pressures in clays and mudstones of the Lias Group Coupling effects of stress, seepage and damage during reconstruction and excavation of abandoned deep water-rich roadways Adopting Systems Engineering Approach to a Feasibility Study of Siding Development at Midsomer Norton Station
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1