以南非黑人经济赋权话语构建政治和结构转型的象征性议程

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES African Studies Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/00020184.2021.2007356
M. Makgoba
{"title":"以南非黑人经济赋权话语构建政治和结构转型的象征性议程","authors":"M. Makgoba","doi":"10.1080/00020184.2021.2007356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT By employing a critical discourse analysis and approaching Black economic empowerment as an institutionalised discursive phenomenon, this article argues that BEE has always maintained a discursive stance against the transformation of historical, structural and power inequities in South Africa. However, there is a presumption in academic circles that BEE aims to transform these inequities that emanate from the structural legacies of apartheid and colonialism. This article disputes this presumption in constructionist and discursive terms. It concludes that BEE contains corporate and ahistorical discourses of managerialism and depoliticised empowerment and redistribution that disconnect the policy from structural and political processes. These discourses structurally preserve, conceal, reproduce and depoliticise oppression and domination while running the risk of maintaining existing structures of decision-making, power and procedures in the private sectors. The article finds that primary documents such as the Black Economic Empowerment Commission Report, the Department of Trade and Industry’s BEE Strategy and the BBBEE Acts appropriate anti-colonial and anti-apartheid discourses to legitimise the legalisation, formalisation and implementation of BEE and to promote the inclusion, participation and assimilation of Black people within the existing structures and historical practices that produced racial injustices in the first place.","PeriodicalId":51769,"journal":{"name":"African Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing the Symbolic Agendas of Political and Structural Transformation with the Discourse of Black Economic Empowerment in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"M. Makgoba\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00020184.2021.2007356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT By employing a critical discourse analysis and approaching Black economic empowerment as an institutionalised discursive phenomenon, this article argues that BEE has always maintained a discursive stance against the transformation of historical, structural and power inequities in South Africa. However, there is a presumption in academic circles that BEE aims to transform these inequities that emanate from the structural legacies of apartheid and colonialism. This article disputes this presumption in constructionist and discursive terms. It concludes that BEE contains corporate and ahistorical discourses of managerialism and depoliticised empowerment and redistribution that disconnect the policy from structural and political processes. These discourses structurally preserve, conceal, reproduce and depoliticise oppression and domination while running the risk of maintaining existing structures of decision-making, power and procedures in the private sectors. The article finds that primary documents such as the Black Economic Empowerment Commission Report, the Department of Trade and Industry’s BEE Strategy and the BBBEE Acts appropriate anti-colonial and anti-apartheid discourses to legitimise the legalisation, formalisation and implementation of BEE and to promote the inclusion, participation and assimilation of Black people within the existing structures and historical practices that produced racial injustices in the first place.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00020184.2021.2007356\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00020184.2021.2007356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文通过批判性话语分析,将黑人经济赋权视为一种制度化的话语现象,认为BEE一直保持着反对南非历史、结构和权力不平等转变的话语立场。然而,学术界有一种假设,BEE旨在改变种族隔离和殖民主义结构性遗留下来的这些不平等现象。本文从建构主义和话语主义的角度对这一假设提出了质疑。它的结论是,BEE包含了管理主义和非政治化赋权和再分配的企业和非历史话语,这些话语将政策与结构和政治进程脱节。这些话语在结构上保留、隐藏、复制和非政治化压迫和统治,同时冒着维护私营部门现有决策、权力和程序结构的风险。文章发现,黑人经济赋权委员会报告、贸易和工业部的BEE战略和BBBEE法案等主要文件适当的反殖民和反种族隔离言论,使BEE的合法化、正式化和实施合法化,并促进包容性,在最初产生种族不公正的现有结构和历史实践中,黑人的参与和同化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Constructing the Symbolic Agendas of Political and Structural Transformation with the Discourse of Black Economic Empowerment in South Africa
ABSTRACT By employing a critical discourse analysis and approaching Black economic empowerment as an institutionalised discursive phenomenon, this article argues that BEE has always maintained a discursive stance against the transformation of historical, structural and power inequities in South Africa. However, there is a presumption in academic circles that BEE aims to transform these inequities that emanate from the structural legacies of apartheid and colonialism. This article disputes this presumption in constructionist and discursive terms. It concludes that BEE contains corporate and ahistorical discourses of managerialism and depoliticised empowerment and redistribution that disconnect the policy from structural and political processes. These discourses structurally preserve, conceal, reproduce and depoliticise oppression and domination while running the risk of maintaining existing structures of decision-making, power and procedures in the private sectors. The article finds that primary documents such as the Black Economic Empowerment Commission Report, the Department of Trade and Industry’s BEE Strategy and the BBBEE Acts appropriate anti-colonial and anti-apartheid discourses to legitimise the legalisation, formalisation and implementation of BEE and to promote the inclusion, participation and assimilation of Black people within the existing structures and historical practices that produced racial injustices in the first place.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Studies
African Studies AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Discourse of Secession in Novuyo Rosa Tshuma’s House of Stone (Un)doing Gender: The Ethnographic Significance of Mbube Dirge Black Diasporic Subjectivity and Lacanian Lack of Home: A Reading of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Americanah Laying Waste to History: Recyclia and Urban Art Traditions in Mozambique Local Market Institutions and Solid Waste Management in Accra’s Open-Air Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1