多维和跨学科的行为经济学方法

F. Musso
{"title":"多维和跨学科的行为经济学方法","authors":"F. Musso","doi":"10.14276/2285-0430.2284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the human mind is an issue still characterized by great complexity, despite the fact that over the years the field of neurosciences has made great advances and technology allowed a greater ability to explore the cognitive processes of the human being. In economics, it is important to consider how people’s mind regulates and classifies information for making decisions and the impact that their coding has on emotional reactions, feelings and choices. Since the nineties, behavioral economics has taken on an increasingly important role, especially thanks to the contribution of psychologists Kahneman and Tversky, authors of the first model aimed at formalizing cognitive decision-making mechanisms in uncertain situations. This current of thought is opposed to the principles proposed by the classical economics, based on the hypothesis of rationality of decision makers, able through their choices to maximize the benefits of organizations. On the other side, a cognitive approach to the choices of economic agents considers the influence that a series of cognitive bias have on decision-making processes, which often lead to suboptimal results. The models developed within the behavioral economics do not have as their ultimate goal to replace traditional economic models, but to contribute in providing an explanation of human behavior within the economic sphere that classical principles only partially recognize. Introducing a cognitive approach allows to understand more in depth both human nature and the limits of classical models. The economic perspective assumes that decision-makers are rational and consistent with the objective of maximizing a subjectively expected utility; the behavioral perspective adds more realistic parameters related to the influence of social norms, emotions, environmental factors, taking into account that humans' powers of computation and cogitation are limited, and people are not consistent. Of course, when interpreting economic phenomena, the assumption of purely rational and coherent behavior is unlikely to be realistic. To understand the economic behavior, a multidimensional, interdisciplinary approach becomes necessary, the distance between different research communities must be reduced and opportunities from the integration of research methodologies must be pursued. Sociology, political sciences, psychology, neurosciences, biology, anthropology, can contribute in completing the analytical perspectives that are needed for the exploration of the human behavior in the economic field.","PeriodicalId":30526,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economic Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidimensional and Interdisciplinary Approach for Behavioral Economics\",\"authors\":\"F. Musso\",\"doi\":\"10.14276/2285-0430.2284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding the human mind is an issue still characterized by great complexity, despite the fact that over the years the field of neurosciences has made great advances and technology allowed a greater ability to explore the cognitive processes of the human being. In economics, it is important to consider how people’s mind regulates and classifies information for making decisions and the impact that their coding has on emotional reactions, feelings and choices. Since the nineties, behavioral economics has taken on an increasingly important role, especially thanks to the contribution of psychologists Kahneman and Tversky, authors of the first model aimed at formalizing cognitive decision-making mechanisms in uncertain situations. This current of thought is opposed to the principles proposed by the classical economics, based on the hypothesis of rationality of decision makers, able through their choices to maximize the benefits of organizations. On the other side, a cognitive approach to the choices of economic agents considers the influence that a series of cognitive bias have on decision-making processes, which often lead to suboptimal results. The models developed within the behavioral economics do not have as their ultimate goal to replace traditional economic models, but to contribute in providing an explanation of human behavior within the economic sphere that classical principles only partially recognize. Introducing a cognitive approach allows to understand more in depth both human nature and the limits of classical models. The economic perspective assumes that decision-makers are rational and consistent with the objective of maximizing a subjectively expected utility; the behavioral perspective adds more realistic parameters related to the influence of social norms, emotions, environmental factors, taking into account that humans' powers of computation and cogitation are limited, and people are not consistent. Of course, when interpreting economic phenomena, the assumption of purely rational and coherent behavior is unlikely to be realistic. To understand the economic behavior, a multidimensional, interdisciplinary approach becomes necessary, the distance between different research communities must be reduced and opportunities from the integration of research methodologies must be pursued. Sociology, political sciences, psychology, neurosciences, biology, anthropology, can contribute in completing the analytical perspectives that are needed for the exploration of the human behavior in the economic field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Economic Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Economic Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14276/2285-0430.2284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economic Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14276/2285-0430.2284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管多年来神经科学领域取得了巨大的进步,技术也使探索人类认知过程的能力得到了提高,但理解人类的思维仍然是一个非常复杂的问题。在经济学中,重要的是要考虑人们的大脑如何调节和分类信息以做出决定,以及他们的编码对情绪反应、感觉和选择的影响。自上世纪90年代以来,行为经济学发挥了越来越重要的作用,尤其是由于心理学家卡尼曼(Kahneman)和特沃斯基(Tversky)的贡献,他们提出了第一个旨在形式化不确定情况下认知决策机制的模型。这一思潮与古典经济学提出的原则相反,它基于决策者的理性假设,能够通过他们的选择使组织的利益最大化。另一方面,经济主体选择的认知方法考虑了一系列认知偏差对决策过程的影响,这往往导致次优结果。行为经济学中发展的模型的最终目标不是取代传统的经济模型,而是在经济领域中为人类行为提供一种解释,而古典原则只是部分地承认了这一点。引入认知方法可以更深入地理解人性和经典模型的局限性。经济学观点假设决策者是理性的,并与最大化主观预期效用的目标保持一致;行为视角考虑到人类的计算能力和认知能力是有限的,而且人是不一致的,增加了与社会规范、情绪、环境因素影响相关的更现实的参数。当然,在解释经济现象时,纯粹理性和连贯行为的假设不太可能是现实的。为了理解经济行为,需要一种多维的、跨学科的方法,必须缩小不同研究团体之间的距离,必须寻求整合研究方法的机会。社会学、政治学、心理学、神经科学、生物学、人类学,都有助于完善在经济领域探索人类行为所需要的分析视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multidimensional and Interdisciplinary Approach for Behavioral Economics
Understanding the human mind is an issue still characterized by great complexity, despite the fact that over the years the field of neurosciences has made great advances and technology allowed a greater ability to explore the cognitive processes of the human being. In economics, it is important to consider how people’s mind regulates and classifies information for making decisions and the impact that their coding has on emotional reactions, feelings and choices. Since the nineties, behavioral economics has taken on an increasingly important role, especially thanks to the contribution of psychologists Kahneman and Tversky, authors of the first model aimed at formalizing cognitive decision-making mechanisms in uncertain situations. This current of thought is opposed to the principles proposed by the classical economics, based on the hypothesis of rationality of decision makers, able through their choices to maximize the benefits of organizations. On the other side, a cognitive approach to the choices of economic agents considers the influence that a series of cognitive bias have on decision-making processes, which often lead to suboptimal results. The models developed within the behavioral economics do not have as their ultimate goal to replace traditional economic models, but to contribute in providing an explanation of human behavior within the economic sphere that classical principles only partially recognize. Introducing a cognitive approach allows to understand more in depth both human nature and the limits of classical models. The economic perspective assumes that decision-makers are rational and consistent with the objective of maximizing a subjectively expected utility; the behavioral perspective adds more realistic parameters related to the influence of social norms, emotions, environmental factors, taking into account that humans' powers of computation and cogitation are limited, and people are not consistent. Of course, when interpreting economic phenomena, the assumption of purely rational and coherent behavior is unlikely to be realistic. To understand the economic behavior, a multidimensional, interdisciplinary approach becomes necessary, the distance between different research communities must be reduced and opportunities from the integration of research methodologies must be pursued. Sociology, political sciences, psychology, neurosciences, biology, anthropology, can contribute in completing the analytical perspectives that are needed for the exploration of the human behavior in the economic field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Foreign market entry decision-making: what do we know so far? In Search of a Ratio for a Non-Rational Domain Born International Spin-Offs in an Italian Industrial District: An Exploratory Study on Two Range Hood Producers Women’s Presence on European Boards and The Performance Cycle of Value Creation as an Instrument to Achieve the Gender Quotas Global Strategies and Entrepreneurial Firms: The Role of the Entrepreneur’s Features in the Decision-Making Process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1