中欧关系与数据治理政策:公民社会在克服网络空间地缘政治挑战中的作用

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto Pub Date : 2022-10-28 DOI:10.18543/ced.2555
Cem Nalbantoglu
{"title":"中欧关系与数据治理政策:公民社会在克服网络空间地缘政治挑战中的作用","authors":"Cem Nalbantoglu","doi":"10.18543/ced.2555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EU and China are the global powers that can affect and alter international relations at the political, economic, and societal levels. While the EU shapes the foreign policy in Europe, China has a critical role in Asian politics. In Asia-Europe interregionalism and interregional relations, the EU-China relations are essential in consolidating global and regional stability. However, in the current political conjuncture, the security issues in cyberspace challenge both actors. Hence, cybersecurity and digitalization policies are a potential conflict area in EU-China relations. As the impact of technological and digital developments increases on the global political economy, global powers are developing policies to breast the tape in technological development. The European Commission has set “A Europe fit for the digital age” as one of its priorities for the 2019-2024 term. Meanwhile, since 2015 China has been promoting the Digital Belt and Road Initiative to foster digital connectivity among the Belt and Road countries. However, big data analytics are important in developing new technologies, especially in digital connectivity, automation, and robotics. In this context, data governance has become a geopolitical concept in international relations. Consequently, differences between China’s and the EU’s approach to data – access, process, and collection – may result in geopolitical confrontations. In this paper, we argue that both actors should involve civil society in the policymaking process to address the dynamics of information technologies, cooperate on adapting a global approach and avoid geopolitical confrontations. Civil society organizations can help the actors understand the underlying risks in cybersecurity and form a non-conflicting approach in data governance frameworks. Furthermore, while investigating the EU and China’s data governance models, we shed light upon the role of civil society organizations in addressing the potential risks and opportunities in cyberspace. Finally, we conclude our paper with policy recommendations for China and the EU to cooperate in cyberspace by involving civil society organizations. \nReceived: 18 May 2022Accepted: 25 July 2022","PeriodicalId":40611,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EU - China relations and data governance policies: the role of civil societies in overcoming geopolitical challenges in cyberspace\",\"authors\":\"Cem Nalbantoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.18543/ced.2555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"EU and China are the global powers that can affect and alter international relations at the political, economic, and societal levels. While the EU shapes the foreign policy in Europe, China has a critical role in Asian politics. In Asia-Europe interregionalism and interregional relations, the EU-China relations are essential in consolidating global and regional stability. However, in the current political conjuncture, the security issues in cyberspace challenge both actors. Hence, cybersecurity and digitalization policies are a potential conflict area in EU-China relations. As the impact of technological and digital developments increases on the global political economy, global powers are developing policies to breast the tape in technological development. The European Commission has set “A Europe fit for the digital age” as one of its priorities for the 2019-2024 term. Meanwhile, since 2015 China has been promoting the Digital Belt and Road Initiative to foster digital connectivity among the Belt and Road countries. However, big data analytics are important in developing new technologies, especially in digital connectivity, automation, and robotics. In this context, data governance has become a geopolitical concept in international relations. Consequently, differences between China’s and the EU’s approach to data – access, process, and collection – may result in geopolitical confrontations. In this paper, we argue that both actors should involve civil society in the policymaking process to address the dynamics of information technologies, cooperate on adapting a global approach and avoid geopolitical confrontations. Civil society organizations can help the actors understand the underlying risks in cybersecurity and form a non-conflicting approach in data governance frameworks. Furthermore, while investigating the EU and China’s data governance models, we shed light upon the role of civil society organizations in addressing the potential risks and opportunities in cyberspace. Finally, we conclude our paper with policy recommendations for China and the EU to cooperate in cyberspace by involving civil society organizations. \\nReceived: 18 May 2022Accepted: 25 July 2022\",\"PeriodicalId\":40611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18543/ced.2555\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18543/ced.2555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟和中国是能够在政治、经济和社会层面影响和改变国际关系的全球大国。虽然欧盟决定着欧洲的外交政策,但中国在亚洲政治中扮演着关键角色。在亚欧区域间和区域间关系中,欧中关系对巩固全球和地区稳定至关重要。然而,在当前的政治形势下,网络空间安全问题对双方都是挑战。因此,网络安全和数字化政策是中欧关系中的一个潜在冲突领域。随着技术和数字发展对全球政治经济的影响越来越大,全球大国正在制定政策,以推动技术发展。欧盟委员会将“一个适合数字时代的欧洲”作为2019-2024年任期的优先事项之一。同时,自2015年以来,中国一直在推动数字“一带一路”倡议,促进“一带一路”国家之间的数字互联互通。然而,大数据分析在开发新技术方面非常重要,特别是在数字连接、自动化和机器人技术方面。在此背景下,数据治理成为国际关系中的地缘政治概念。因此,中国和欧盟在数据获取、处理和收集方面的差异可能导致地缘政治对抗。在本文中,我们认为双方都应该让公民社会参与政策制定过程,以应对信息技术的动态变化,在适应全球方法方面进行合作,并避免地缘政治对抗。民间社会组织可以帮助参与者了解网络安全的潜在风险,并在数据治理框架中形成一种不冲突的方法。此外,在调查欧盟和中国的数据治理模式时,我们揭示了民间社会组织在应对网络空间潜在风险和机遇方面的作用。最后,我们对中国和欧盟通过民间社会组织参与网络空间合作提出了政策建议。收稿日期:2022年5月18日接收日期:2022年7月25日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EU - China relations and data governance policies: the role of civil societies in overcoming geopolitical challenges in cyberspace
EU and China are the global powers that can affect and alter international relations at the political, economic, and societal levels. While the EU shapes the foreign policy in Europe, China has a critical role in Asian politics. In Asia-Europe interregionalism and interregional relations, the EU-China relations are essential in consolidating global and regional stability. However, in the current political conjuncture, the security issues in cyberspace challenge both actors. Hence, cybersecurity and digitalization policies are a potential conflict area in EU-China relations. As the impact of technological and digital developments increases on the global political economy, global powers are developing policies to breast the tape in technological development. The European Commission has set “A Europe fit for the digital age” as one of its priorities for the 2019-2024 term. Meanwhile, since 2015 China has been promoting the Digital Belt and Road Initiative to foster digital connectivity among the Belt and Road countries. However, big data analytics are important in developing new technologies, especially in digital connectivity, automation, and robotics. In this context, data governance has become a geopolitical concept in international relations. Consequently, differences between China’s and the EU’s approach to data – access, process, and collection – may result in geopolitical confrontations. In this paper, we argue that both actors should involve civil society in the policymaking process to address the dynamics of information technologies, cooperate on adapting a global approach and avoid geopolitical confrontations. Civil society organizations can help the actors understand the underlying risks in cybersecurity and form a non-conflicting approach in data governance frameworks. Furthermore, while investigating the EU and China’s data governance models, we shed light upon the role of civil society organizations in addressing the potential risks and opportunities in cyberspace. Finally, we conclude our paper with policy recommendations for China and the EU to cooperate in cyberspace by involving civil society organizations. Received: 18 May 2022Accepted: 25 July 2022
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Deusto Journal of European Studies (DJES) is a university journal specialised in the study of the European Union from an interdisciplinary perspective. It primarily aims at disseminating knowledge on the different aspects of the European construction process (historical, political, legal, economic, social, cultural issues, etc.). It also aims at encouraging reflection on and critical assessment of the different factors that determine European Union''s evolution and transformation. First published in 1987, Deusto Journal of European Studies (DJES) is issued twice a year. Its contents include a section on doctrinal articles, a section commenting the jurisprudence of the EU Court of Justice and a section on current European issues.
期刊最新文献
A vueltas con la regulación de las aguas de baño en la Unión Europea: ¿hacer de la necesidad, virtud? Actualidad institucional y económica de España en el marco de la Unión Europea (julio de 2024) Crónica de la Jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea Primer semestre de 2024 La protección del medio ambiente en situaciones de conflicto armado: implicaciones para la Unión Europea a raíz de la guerra de Ucrania El sesgado desarrollo del convenio de Aarhus en la Unión Europea. ¿Justicia para el medioambiente?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1