“男人和妻子应该做的事”:重新考虑近代早期英国的婚姻分居

IF 0.5 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Cultural & Social History Pub Date : 2022-11-18 DOI:10.1080/14780038.2022.2146476
Emily Rhodes
{"title":"“男人和妻子应该做的事”:重新考虑近代早期英国的婚姻分居","authors":"Emily Rhodes","doi":"10.1080/14780038.2022.2146476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This analysis of petitions from the Lancashire Quarter Sessions submitted by unhappy wives uncovers evidence of women who separated from their husbands illegally between 1660 and 1700. When informally separated, women could turn to JPs to formalise their marital situation. Petitionary evidence also shows that the concept of desertion should be redefined, as many spouses did not completely separate. These petitions demonstrate that authorities could sanction informal separation if peace was maintained. Overall, this article studies separated wives when their legal position was precarious, and illustrates how new sources can help explore the history of marriage in early modern England..","PeriodicalId":45240,"journal":{"name":"Cultural & Social History","volume":"20 1","pages":"481 - 498"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘As Man and Wyfe Ought to Doe’: Reconsidering Marital Separation in Early Modern England\",\"authors\":\"Emily Rhodes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14780038.2022.2146476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This analysis of petitions from the Lancashire Quarter Sessions submitted by unhappy wives uncovers evidence of women who separated from their husbands illegally between 1660 and 1700. When informally separated, women could turn to JPs to formalise their marital situation. Petitionary evidence also shows that the concept of desertion should be redefined, as many spouses did not completely separate. These petitions demonstrate that authorities could sanction informal separation if peace was maintained. Overall, this article studies separated wives when their legal position was precarious, and illustrates how new sources can help explore the history of marriage in early modern England..\",\"PeriodicalId\":45240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural & Social History\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"481 - 498\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural & Social History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780038.2022.2146476\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural & Social History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780038.2022.2146476","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文对不幸福的妻子提交的兰开夏郡议会请愿书进行了分析,发现了1660年至1700年间女性与丈夫非法分居的证据。当非正式分居时,女性可以求助于JPs来正式确定她们的婚姻状况。请愿证据还表明,遗弃的概念应该重新定义,因为许多配偶并没有完全分居。这些请愿书表明,如果维持和平,当局可以批准非正式分居。总的来说,这篇文章研究了在法律地位不稳定时分居的妻子,并说明了新的来源如何有助于探索现代早期英国的婚姻史。。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘As Man and Wyfe Ought to Doe’: Reconsidering Marital Separation in Early Modern England
ABSTRACT This analysis of petitions from the Lancashire Quarter Sessions submitted by unhappy wives uncovers evidence of women who separated from their husbands illegally between 1660 and 1700. When informally separated, women could turn to JPs to formalise their marital situation. Petitionary evidence also shows that the concept of desertion should be redefined, as many spouses did not completely separate. These petitions demonstrate that authorities could sanction informal separation if peace was maintained. Overall, this article studies separated wives when their legal position was precarious, and illustrates how new sources can help explore the history of marriage in early modern England..
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Cultural & Social History is published on behalf of the Social History Society (SHS). Members receive the journal as part of their membership package. To join the Society, please download an application form on the Society"s website and follow the instructions provided.
期刊最新文献
The Body Flâneur: Body-Biased Gaze and Ocular Inspections of Women’s Bodies in Swedish Serial Literature, 1850–1890 “Share the Pleasures with the Public”: Evolution of Urban Landscapes in Nanjing in Song Dynasty China (976–1279) Unfairness at the Funfair: The French Syndicate for Travelling Showpeople in the Long Nineteenth Century Distrust of Institutions in Early Modern Britain and America Distrust of Institutions in Early Modern Britain and America , by Brian P. Levack, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022, 204 pp., £36.71 (hardback), ISBN 9780192847409, £24.99 (paperback), ISBN 9780198886357 Propaganda, Gender, and Cultural Power: Projections and Perceptions of France in Britain C. 1880-1944 Propaganda, Gender, and Cultural Power: Projections and Perceptions of France in Britain C. 1880-1944 , by Charlotte Faucher, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022, 238 pp., £25.33 (hardback), ISBN 9780197267318
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1