通过回顾和分析建模了解各种胶结材料捕获的二氧化碳利用潜力

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Magazine of Concrete Research Pub Date : 2023-07-07 DOI:10.1680/jmacr.22.00313
Sowrav Saikia, Aditya S. Rajput
{"title":"通过回顾和分析建模了解各种胶结材料捕获的二氧化碳利用潜力","authors":"Sowrav Saikia, Aditya S. Rajput","doi":"10.1680/jmacr.22.00313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carbon sequestration in cement-based materials has emerged as one of the promising avenues to utilize captured carbon dioxide (CO2) and reduce the carbon footprint of the concrete industry. This article presents a comprehensive review of various studies conducted in this domain with a particular emphasis on factors affecting the carbon uptake potential of various concrete types and the effect of carbonation on the critical properties of concretes. Studies conducted on Carbon Sequestered Concrete's (CSC's) micro-mechanical analysis show that carbonation significantly improved the microhardness of the concrete samples, thereby increasing the strength and reducing the cement intake requirement. Further, keeping two parameters, namely, the ratio of water-to-solid (w/s) along with carbonation reaction time in focus, the CO2 uptaking capacity in concrete slurry waste (CSW) was evaluated using non-linear regression analysis. It was observed that CSW paste had a maximum CO2 uptake with an intermediate w/s ratio of 0.2 due to CO2 reaction hindrances during diffusion at a higher w/s ratio and lack of hydration at a lower w/s ratio. On the contrary, for belite-rich cement, a higher w/s ratio led to higher CO2 uptake owing to belite phase consumption leading to increased calcite production. Additionally, comparing the CO2 maximum uptake capacity of CSW at a particular condition with various other cement-based materials, it was observed that belite-rich cement had the ability to sequester the maximum amount of CO2 out of other cement-based materials considered in this study. Highlights: (1) CSW paste made of a w/s ratio of 0.2 and carbonated for 600 hours could achieve a CO2 uptake capacity of 20%. (2) Belite-rich cement and nano-TiO2-added cement had the highest and the lowest CO2 uptake capacity, respectively, with CSW lying in the middle, which is preceded and succeeded by limestone-added cement and Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) cement.","PeriodicalId":18113,"journal":{"name":"Magazine of Concrete Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the captured CO2 utilisation potential of various cementitious materials through review and analytical modelling\",\"authors\":\"Sowrav Saikia, Aditya S. Rajput\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jmacr.22.00313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Carbon sequestration in cement-based materials has emerged as one of the promising avenues to utilize captured carbon dioxide (CO2) and reduce the carbon footprint of the concrete industry. This article presents a comprehensive review of various studies conducted in this domain with a particular emphasis on factors affecting the carbon uptake potential of various concrete types and the effect of carbonation on the critical properties of concretes. Studies conducted on Carbon Sequestered Concrete's (CSC's) micro-mechanical analysis show that carbonation significantly improved the microhardness of the concrete samples, thereby increasing the strength and reducing the cement intake requirement. Further, keeping two parameters, namely, the ratio of water-to-solid (w/s) along with carbonation reaction time in focus, the CO2 uptaking capacity in concrete slurry waste (CSW) was evaluated using non-linear regression analysis. It was observed that CSW paste had a maximum CO2 uptake with an intermediate w/s ratio of 0.2 due to CO2 reaction hindrances during diffusion at a higher w/s ratio and lack of hydration at a lower w/s ratio. On the contrary, for belite-rich cement, a higher w/s ratio led to higher CO2 uptake owing to belite phase consumption leading to increased calcite production. Additionally, comparing the CO2 maximum uptake capacity of CSW at a particular condition with various other cement-based materials, it was observed that belite-rich cement had the ability to sequester the maximum amount of CO2 out of other cement-based materials considered in this study. Highlights: (1) CSW paste made of a w/s ratio of 0.2 and carbonated for 600 hours could achieve a CO2 uptake capacity of 20%. (2) Belite-rich cement and nano-TiO2-added cement had the highest and the lowest CO2 uptake capacity, respectively, with CSW lying in the middle, which is preceded and succeeded by limestone-added cement and Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) cement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magazine of Concrete Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magazine of Concrete Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.22.00313\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magazine of Concrete Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.22.00313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水泥基材料中的碳封存已经成为利用捕获的二氧化碳(CO2)和减少混凝土工业碳足迹的有前途的途径之一。本文全面回顾了在这一领域进行的各种研究,特别强调了影响各种混凝土类型的碳吸收潜力的因素以及碳化对混凝土关键性能的影响。碳封存混凝土(CSC)微力学分析研究表明,碳化显著提高了混凝土样品的显微硬度,从而提高了强度,降低了水泥的进水量要求。进一步,以水固比(w/s)和碳化反应时间为重点,采用非线性回归分析方法对混凝土浆体废弃物(CSW)的CO2吸收能力进行评价。结果表明,高w/s比时,由于扩散过程中存在CO2反应障碍,低w/s比时缺乏水化作用,CSW膏体在中间w/s比为0.2时,CO2吸收量最大。相反,对于富含白石的水泥,更高的w/s比导致更高的CO2吸收量,因为白石相消耗导致方解石产量增加。此外,通过对比CSW在特定条件下与其他各种水泥基材料的最大CO2吸收量,我们发现富白石水泥能够从本研究考虑的其他水泥基材料中吸收最多的CO2。(1) w/s比为0.2的CSW浆料,碳化600小时,CO2吸收量可达20%。(2)富白石水泥和纳米tio2水泥的CO2吸收能力分别最高和最低,CSW居中,石灰石水泥和普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)排在其前、后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the captured CO2 utilisation potential of various cementitious materials through review and analytical modelling
Carbon sequestration in cement-based materials has emerged as one of the promising avenues to utilize captured carbon dioxide (CO2) and reduce the carbon footprint of the concrete industry. This article presents a comprehensive review of various studies conducted in this domain with a particular emphasis on factors affecting the carbon uptake potential of various concrete types and the effect of carbonation on the critical properties of concretes. Studies conducted on Carbon Sequestered Concrete's (CSC's) micro-mechanical analysis show that carbonation significantly improved the microhardness of the concrete samples, thereby increasing the strength and reducing the cement intake requirement. Further, keeping two parameters, namely, the ratio of water-to-solid (w/s) along with carbonation reaction time in focus, the CO2 uptaking capacity in concrete slurry waste (CSW) was evaluated using non-linear regression analysis. It was observed that CSW paste had a maximum CO2 uptake with an intermediate w/s ratio of 0.2 due to CO2 reaction hindrances during diffusion at a higher w/s ratio and lack of hydration at a lower w/s ratio. On the contrary, for belite-rich cement, a higher w/s ratio led to higher CO2 uptake owing to belite phase consumption leading to increased calcite production. Additionally, comparing the CO2 maximum uptake capacity of CSW at a particular condition with various other cement-based materials, it was observed that belite-rich cement had the ability to sequester the maximum amount of CO2 out of other cement-based materials considered in this study. Highlights: (1) CSW paste made of a w/s ratio of 0.2 and carbonated for 600 hours could achieve a CO2 uptake capacity of 20%. (2) Belite-rich cement and nano-TiO2-added cement had the highest and the lowest CO2 uptake capacity, respectively, with CSW lying in the middle, which is preceded and succeeded by limestone-added cement and Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) cement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Magazine of Concrete Research
Magazine of Concrete Research 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: For concrete and other cementitious derivatives to be developed further, we need to understand the use of alternative hydraulically active materials used in combination with plain Portland Cement, sustainability and durability issues. Both fundamental and best practice issues need to be addressed. Magazine of Concrete Research covers every aspect of concrete manufacture and behaviour from performance and evaluation of constituent materials to mix design, testing, durability, structural analysis and composite construction.
期刊最新文献
Characterisation proposal of direct shear strength of steel fibre-reinforced concrete Punching shear tests and design of UHTCC-enhanced RC slab-column joints with shear reinforcements Engineering and microstructural properties of self-compacting concrete containing coarse recycled concrete aggregate Modelling chloride diffusion in concrete with carbonated surface layer Shear friction capacity of monolithic construction joints reinforced with self-prestressing reinforcing steel bars
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1