{"title":"模糊性在哪里?英国南部英语交互发音变化中的形态学效应","authors":"Patrycja Strycharczuk, J. Scobbie","doi":"10.5334/LABPHON.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fronting of the high-back, /u:/ and /U/, as currently seen in Southern British \nEnglish, is a rare opportunity to study two similar sound changes at different stages of \ntheir phonetic development: /u:/-fronting is a more advanced change than /U/-fronting. \nSince the fronting in both vowels is restricted from applying before a following final /l/, \ne.g. in words like fool or pull, we can exploit the difference in the phonetic advance- \nment of /u:/ and /U/-fronting to illuminate the nature of `fuzzy contrasts', affecting \nvowel+/l/ sequences in morphologically complex words. As recent results show that \n/u:/-fronting is partially limited in fool-ing (but not in monomorphemes like hula), we \nask whether similar morphological constraints affect /U/ followed by /l/ (e.g. bully vs. \npull-ing). Simultaneously, we consider the question of what phonological generalisation \nbest captures the interaction between vowel fronting, /l/-darkening, and morphological \nstructure. We present ultrasound data from 20 speakers of SBE representing two age \ngroups. The data show that morphologically conditioned contrasts are consistent for \n/u:/+/l/, but variable and limited in size for /U/+/l/. We relate these findings to \nthe debate on morphology-phonetics interactions and the emergence of phonological \nabstraction.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whence the fuzziness? Morphological effects in interacting sound changes in Southern British English\",\"authors\":\"Patrycja Strycharczuk, J. Scobbie\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/LABPHON.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The fronting of the high-back, /u:/ and /U/, as currently seen in Southern British \\nEnglish, is a rare opportunity to study two similar sound changes at different stages of \\ntheir phonetic development: /u:/-fronting is a more advanced change than /U/-fronting. \\nSince the fronting in both vowels is restricted from applying before a following final /l/, \\ne.g. in words like fool or pull, we can exploit the difference in the phonetic advance- \\nment of /u:/ and /U/-fronting to illuminate the nature of `fuzzy contrasts', affecting \\nvowel+/l/ sequences in morphologically complex words. As recent results show that \\n/u:/-fronting is partially limited in fool-ing (but not in monomorphemes like hula), we \\nask whether similar morphological constraints affect /U/ followed by /l/ (e.g. bully vs. \\npull-ing). Simultaneously, we consider the question of what phonological generalisation \\nbest captures the interaction between vowel fronting, /l/-darkening, and morphological \\nstructure. We present ultrasound data from 20 speakers of SBE representing two age \\ngroups. The data show that morphologically conditioned contrasts are consistent for \\n/u:/+/l/, but variable and limited in size for /U/+/l/. We relate these findings to \\nthe debate on morphology-phonetics interactions and the emergence of phonological \\nabstraction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/LABPHON.24\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/LABPHON.24","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Whence the fuzziness? Morphological effects in interacting sound changes in Southern British English
The fronting of the high-back, /u:/ and /U/, as currently seen in Southern British
English, is a rare opportunity to study two similar sound changes at different stages of
their phonetic development: /u:/-fronting is a more advanced change than /U/-fronting.
Since the fronting in both vowels is restricted from applying before a following final /l/,
e.g. in words like fool or pull, we can exploit the difference in the phonetic advance-
ment of /u:/ and /U/-fronting to illuminate the nature of `fuzzy contrasts', affecting
vowel+/l/ sequences in morphologically complex words. As recent results show that
/u:/-fronting is partially limited in fool-ing (but not in monomorphemes like hula), we
ask whether similar morphological constraints affect /U/ followed by /l/ (e.g. bully vs.
pull-ing). Simultaneously, we consider the question of what phonological generalisation
best captures the interaction between vowel fronting, /l/-darkening, and morphological
structure. We present ultrasound data from 20 speakers of SBE representing two age
groups. The data show that morphologically conditioned contrasts are consistent for
/u:/+/l/, but variable and limited in size for /U/+/l/. We relate these findings to
the debate on morphology-phonetics interactions and the emergence of phonological
abstraction.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.