布莱克敦土著机构作为一个活生生的、具体化的存在:通过创造力去殖民化澳大利亚第一民族的创伤区

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 CULTURAL STUDIES Space and Culture Pub Date : 2022-02-24 DOI:10.1177/12063312211073048
Brook Andrew, L. Hibberd
{"title":"布莱克敦土著机构作为一个活生生的、具体化的存在:通过创造力去殖民化澳大利亚第一民族的创伤区","authors":"Brook Andrew, L. Hibberd","doi":"10.1177/12063312211073048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Australia, the trauma of the forced removal, institutionalization, and attempted assimilation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children under Stolen Generations policies is rarely publicly memorialized, especially at the children’s homes and missions where these things took place. Darug Nation reclamation of the former site of the Blacktown Native Institution in Western Sydney entails, however, a distinct memorialization of the land as a powerful identity through restoring ceremonial and land care cultural practices that predate invasion. The Darug activation of this place pivots on a powerful Aboriginal ethos of land as “Country”—a living being or spirit. We also contend that this relationship to land is better defined by the expansive term “zone” rather than the colonial, territorial notion of “site.” It is in this context that Darug Traditional Owners, other First Nations artists, and Stolen Generations survivors are generating remarkable artistic, communal, ephemeral, land-based, and performative approaches that empower and restore Darug bonds, with the land of the former institution as a living being.","PeriodicalId":46749,"journal":{"name":"Space and Culture","volume":"25 1","pages":"168 - 183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Blacktown Native Institution as a Living, Embodied Being: Decolonizing Australian First Nations Zones of Trauma Through Creativity\",\"authors\":\"Brook Andrew, L. Hibberd\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/12063312211073048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Australia, the trauma of the forced removal, institutionalization, and attempted assimilation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children under Stolen Generations policies is rarely publicly memorialized, especially at the children’s homes and missions where these things took place. Darug Nation reclamation of the former site of the Blacktown Native Institution in Western Sydney entails, however, a distinct memorialization of the land as a powerful identity through restoring ceremonial and land care cultural practices that predate invasion. The Darug activation of this place pivots on a powerful Aboriginal ethos of land as “Country”—a living being or spirit. We also contend that this relationship to land is better defined by the expansive term “zone” rather than the colonial, territorial notion of “site.” It is in this context that Darug Traditional Owners, other First Nations artists, and Stolen Generations survivors are generating remarkable artistic, communal, ephemeral, land-based, and performative approaches that empower and restore Darug bonds, with the land of the former institution as a living being.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Space and Culture\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"168 - 183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Space and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/12063312211073048\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Space and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/12063312211073048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在澳大利亚,在“偷来的一代”政策下,原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民儿童被强迫迁移、制度化和试图同化的创伤很少被公开纪念,尤其是在发生这些事情的儿童之家和传教会。Darug Nation对西悉尼Blacktown原住民机构旧址的复垦需要通过恢复入侵前的仪式和土地护理文化习俗,对这片土地进行独特的纪念,作为一种强大的身份。达鲁格对这个地方的激活取决于一种强大的土著精神,即把土地视为“国家”——一种活生生的存在或精神。我们还认为,这种与土地的关系最好用“区域”这个宽泛的术语来定义,而不是用“场地”这个殖民的、领土的概念。正是在这种背景下,达鲁格传统所有者、其他第一民族艺术家和被偷走的一代幸存者创造了非凡的艺术、公共、短暂、基于土地和表演的方法,赋予和恢复达鲁格与前机构的土地之间的联系,使其成为一个活生生的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Blacktown Native Institution as a Living, Embodied Being: Decolonizing Australian First Nations Zones of Trauma Through Creativity
In Australia, the trauma of the forced removal, institutionalization, and attempted assimilation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children under Stolen Generations policies is rarely publicly memorialized, especially at the children’s homes and missions where these things took place. Darug Nation reclamation of the former site of the Blacktown Native Institution in Western Sydney entails, however, a distinct memorialization of the land as a powerful identity through restoring ceremonial and land care cultural practices that predate invasion. The Darug activation of this place pivots on a powerful Aboriginal ethos of land as “Country”—a living being or spirit. We also contend that this relationship to land is better defined by the expansive term “zone” rather than the colonial, territorial notion of “site.” It is in this context that Darug Traditional Owners, other First Nations artists, and Stolen Generations survivors are generating remarkable artistic, communal, ephemeral, land-based, and performative approaches that empower and restore Darug bonds, with the land of the former institution as a living being.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Space and Culture
Space and Culture Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Space and Culture is an interdisciplinary journal that fosters the publication of reflections on a wide range of socio-spatial arenas such as the home, the built environment, architecture, urbanism, and geopolitics. it covers Sociology, in particular, Qualitative Sociology and Contemporary Ethnography; Communications, in particular, Media Studies and the Internet; Cultural Studies; Urban Studies; Urban and human Geography; Architecture; Anthropology; and Consumer Research. Articles on the application of contemporary theoretical debates in cultural studies, discourse analysis, virtual identities, virtual citizenship, migrant and diasporic identities, and case studies are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Place Diagnosis Before Transformation: Case of Fener-Balat Elastic Neighboring: Everyday Life Within the Geometry and Materiality of Large Housing Estates Design as Playground: Exploring Spatial Design Through Playful Practices Place Branding Viewed From the Perspective of the Poetics of Space: The Case of Aesop’s Signature Stores Listening Beyond the Human: The Autonomous Recording Unit and the Ethics of Sound in Biodiversity Conservation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1