通过悖论心态促进工作中的遗忘:一种基于理论的方法

IF 2.4 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Baltic Journal of Management Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI:10.1108/bjm-07-2022-0249
Jun Yin
{"title":"通过悖论心态促进工作中的遗忘:一种基于理论的方法","authors":"Jun Yin","doi":"10.1108/bjm-07-2022-0249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to qualitatively investigate when and how individuals' paradox mindset influences their individual unlearning.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopted Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory approach based on constructivist ontology and interpretive epistemology. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 16 employees of a research company. The employees were asked about their perceptions of their roles and other factors that stimulated them to unlearn in a tension-setting environment.FindingsThis study developed a process model of paradox mindset for enhancing individual unlearning through three relational mechanisms, namely, enabling motivation to unlearn, understanding to unlearn and engaging in the unlearning process. The unlearning process is found to be influenced by paradoxical frames and emotions. Moreover, external factors, such as organizational changes, stimulate the adoption of paradoxical cognition and emotions while resource availability facilitates the unlearning process.Originality/valueTo the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first to qualitatively investigate how a paradox mindset facilitates the process of unlearning through relational mechanisms. This model provides a holistic understanding of the cognitive, emotional and motivational processes involved in accepting the tensions of unlearning and promoting the unlearning process. The findings also have implications for research on paradox theory and the management of unlearning tensions at the micro level.","PeriodicalId":46829,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting unlearning at work through paradox mindset: a grounded theory approach\",\"authors\":\"Jun Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/bjm-07-2022-0249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study aims to qualitatively investigate when and how individuals' paradox mindset influences their individual unlearning.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopted Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory approach based on constructivist ontology and interpretive epistemology. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 16 employees of a research company. The employees were asked about their perceptions of their roles and other factors that stimulated them to unlearn in a tension-setting environment.FindingsThis study developed a process model of paradox mindset for enhancing individual unlearning through three relational mechanisms, namely, enabling motivation to unlearn, understanding to unlearn and engaging in the unlearning process. The unlearning process is found to be influenced by paradoxical frames and emotions. Moreover, external factors, such as organizational changes, stimulate the adoption of paradoxical cognition and emotions while resource availability facilitates the unlearning process.Originality/valueTo the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first to qualitatively investigate how a paradox mindset facilitates the process of unlearning through relational mechanisms. This model provides a holistic understanding of the cognitive, emotional and motivational processes involved in accepting the tensions of unlearning and promoting the unlearning process. The findings also have implications for research on paradox theory and the management of unlearning tensions at the micro level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baltic Journal of Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baltic Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-07-2022-0249\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-07-2022-0249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在定性地研究个体的悖论心态何时以及如何影响他们的个体遗忘。设计/方法论/方法本研究采用了查马兹基于建构主义本体论和解释认识论的建构主义基础理论方法。数据是通过对一家研究公司的16名员工进行半结构化访谈收集的。员工们被问及他们对自己角色的看法,以及促使他们在紧张的环境中忘记的其他因素。研究结果本研究建立了一个悖论心态的过程模型,通过三种关系机制,即激发动机遗忘、理解遗忘和参与遗忘过程,来促进个体的遗忘。遗忘过程被发现受到矛盾框架和情绪的影响。此外,外部因素,如组织变化,刺激了矛盾认知和情绪的采用,而资源的可用性促进了遗忘过程。独创性/价值据作者所知,本研究首次定性调查了悖论心态如何通过关系机制促进遗忘过程。该模型提供了对认知、情感和动机过程的全面理解,这些过程涉及接受遗忘的紧张情绪和促进遗忘过程。这一发现也对微观层面的悖论理论研究和遗忘紧张情绪的管理具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Promoting unlearning at work through paradox mindset: a grounded theory approach
PurposeThis study aims to qualitatively investigate when and how individuals' paradox mindset influences their individual unlearning.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopted Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory approach based on constructivist ontology and interpretive epistemology. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 16 employees of a research company. The employees were asked about their perceptions of their roles and other factors that stimulated them to unlearn in a tension-setting environment.FindingsThis study developed a process model of paradox mindset for enhancing individual unlearning through three relational mechanisms, namely, enabling motivation to unlearn, understanding to unlearn and engaging in the unlearning process. The unlearning process is found to be influenced by paradoxical frames and emotions. Moreover, external factors, such as organizational changes, stimulate the adoption of paradoxical cognition and emotions while resource availability facilitates the unlearning process.Originality/valueTo the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first to qualitatively investigate how a paradox mindset facilitates the process of unlearning through relational mechanisms. This model provides a holistic understanding of the cognitive, emotional and motivational processes involved in accepting the tensions of unlearning and promoting the unlearning process. The findings also have implications for research on paradox theory and the management of unlearning tensions at the micro level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Baltic region has experienced rapid political and economic change over recent years. The challenges to managers and management researchers operating within the area are often different to those experienced in other parts of the world. The Baltic Journal of Management contributes to an understanding of different management cultures and provides readers with a fresh look at emerging management practices and research in the countries of the Baltic region and beyond.
期刊最新文献
Age-friendly human resource practices: a comparison of Baltic and Nordic countries Validation of a dispositional critical thinking scale using an original analytical methodology for addressing data from Google Trends Affective states and a firm’s performance: the mediating role of dynamic managerial capabilities Unmasking supplier greenwashing: how information sharing and green trust shape clients’ sustainability Authentic and laissez-faire leadership as drivers of employees well-being: the moderating role of resilience and self-efficacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1