环境成本估算与边际社会成本数学模型——以煤电厂为例

Q3 Social Sciences Environmental Economics Pub Date : 2021-08-20 DOI:10.21511/ee.12(1).2021.08
Toyese Oyewo, Odunayo Magret Olarewaju, Melanie Bernice Cloete, Olukorede Tijani Adenuga
{"title":"环境成本估算与边际社会成本数学模型——以煤电厂为例","authors":"Toyese Oyewo, Odunayo Magret Olarewaju, Melanie Bernice Cloete, Olukorede Tijani Adenuga","doi":"10.21511/ee.12(1).2021.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An increase in electricity production is proportional to environmental risks due to continuous energy production. The paper aims to quantitatively estimate the environmental costs and mathematically model the marginal social cost associated with the lifespan of the coal power plants. Results revealed South Africa Tier 1 company optimum level of electricity production per annum at around 2.15 gigawatts, considering the emission costs and reasonable profit. 85% of the total emissions during the combustion phase average cost of the C02 emission discharged by coal is calculated as 0.23c/KWh, 0.085c/kWh is calculated for NO2, while SO2 is 0.035c/KWh. Total emission cost represents 69.2% of the total cost of producing 1 MGW of electricity. The results confirmed the company losses to be insignificantly considerable to the evaluated environmental costs and capital investment. However, the use of this newly developed mathematical model depends on the source of energy production to confirm the feasibility and profitability of investment in coal-powered stations using environmental management accounting and marginal social cost approaches.\nAcknowledgmentThe authors would like to acknowledge the National Research Foundation and Durban University of Technology for financial support.","PeriodicalId":52974,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental costs estimation and mathematical model of marginal social cost: A case study of coal power plants\",\"authors\":\"Toyese Oyewo, Odunayo Magret Olarewaju, Melanie Bernice Cloete, Olukorede Tijani Adenuga\",\"doi\":\"10.21511/ee.12(1).2021.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An increase in electricity production is proportional to environmental risks due to continuous energy production. The paper aims to quantitatively estimate the environmental costs and mathematically model the marginal social cost associated with the lifespan of the coal power plants. Results revealed South Africa Tier 1 company optimum level of electricity production per annum at around 2.15 gigawatts, considering the emission costs and reasonable profit. 85% of the total emissions during the combustion phase average cost of the C02 emission discharged by coal is calculated as 0.23c/KWh, 0.085c/kWh is calculated for NO2, while SO2 is 0.035c/KWh. Total emission cost represents 69.2% of the total cost of producing 1 MGW of electricity. The results confirmed the company losses to be insignificantly considerable to the evaluated environmental costs and capital investment. However, the use of this newly developed mathematical model depends on the source of energy production to confirm the feasibility and profitability of investment in coal-powered stations using environmental management accounting and marginal social cost approaches.\\nAcknowledgmentThe authors would like to acknowledge the National Research Foundation and Durban University of Technology for financial support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.12(1).2021.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.12(1).2021.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

电力产量的增加与持续能源生产带来的环境风险成正比。本文旨在定量估计环境成本,并对与煤电厂寿命相关的边际社会成本进行数学建模。结果显示,考虑到排放成本和合理利润,南非一级公司的最佳年发电水平约为2.15吉瓦。燃烧阶段总排放量的85%煤炭排放的二氧化碳平均成本计算为0.23c/KWh,NO2计算为0.085c/KWh,SO2计算为0.035c/KWh。总排放成本占生产1 MGW电力总成本的69.2%。结果证实,该公司的损失与评估的环境成本和资本投资相比并不显著。然而,使用这一新开发的数学模型取决于能源生产来源,以使用环境管理会计和边际社会成本方法来确认燃煤发电站投资的可行性和盈利能力。鸣谢作者感谢国家研究基金会和德班理工大学的财政支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Environmental costs estimation and mathematical model of marginal social cost: A case study of coal power plants
An increase in electricity production is proportional to environmental risks due to continuous energy production. The paper aims to quantitatively estimate the environmental costs and mathematically model the marginal social cost associated with the lifespan of the coal power plants. Results revealed South Africa Tier 1 company optimum level of electricity production per annum at around 2.15 gigawatts, considering the emission costs and reasonable profit. 85% of the total emissions during the combustion phase average cost of the C02 emission discharged by coal is calculated as 0.23c/KWh, 0.085c/kWh is calculated for NO2, while SO2 is 0.035c/KWh. Total emission cost represents 69.2% of the total cost of producing 1 MGW of electricity. The results confirmed the company losses to be insignificantly considerable to the evaluated environmental costs and capital investment. However, the use of this newly developed mathematical model depends on the source of energy production to confirm the feasibility and profitability of investment in coal-powered stations using environmental management accounting and marginal social cost approaches. AcknowledgmentThe authors would like to acknowledge the National Research Foundation and Durban University of Technology for financial support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Economics
Environmental Economics Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Decarbonization in the maritime industry: Factors to create an efficient transition strategy Governmental approaches to food security management: A bibliometric analysis Implementation of eco-control system by Indonesian manufacturing firms: Understanding the mediating role of organizational culture Is corporate social responsibility effective in improving environmental quality? Literature review Evaluating the efficiency of public expenditure in municipal waste collection: A comparative study of Portuguese municipalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1