无人机战争中的受害者和创伤

Q1 Arts and Humanities Critical Military Studies Pub Date : 2021-07-29 DOI:10.1080/23337486.2021.1953738
Jacob Holz
{"title":"无人机战争中的受害者和创伤","authors":"Jacob Holz","doi":"10.1080/23337486.2021.1953738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Operators of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) within the military have increasingly been recognized as potential sufferers of immense stress and trauma as a result of the conditions they are exposed to. In cases of such trauma, the provision for and access to sufficient mental health care is vital to minimize risks of developing conditions such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), moral injury or high emotional distress. Through integrating psychological studies and data with critical feminist security studies, this article attempts to establish the validity of drone operators as victims of trauma within the broader context of drone warfare. The aim of this article is to not only highlight this trauma suffered by drone operators, but to also openly address the ongoing stigma and factors that prevent them from seeking adequate mental health care. Drone operators exposed to trauma are further stigmatized and emasculated by their peers, resulting in a decrease in uptake of available mental health support. Through adopting a gendered approach, the article explores how this stigma invalidates much of the experiences and trauma suffered by drone operators, but furthermore is structured by ideas of masculinity and emasculation. Recognizing this stigma and emasculation is not only important for understanding military order and the masculinized dynamics of state violence, but vital for addressing the wider issues of trauma in drone warfare.","PeriodicalId":37527,"journal":{"name":"Critical Military Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23337486.2021.1953738","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Victimhood and trauma within drone warfare\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Holz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23337486.2021.1953738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Operators of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) within the military have increasingly been recognized as potential sufferers of immense stress and trauma as a result of the conditions they are exposed to. In cases of such trauma, the provision for and access to sufficient mental health care is vital to minimize risks of developing conditions such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), moral injury or high emotional distress. Through integrating psychological studies and data with critical feminist security studies, this article attempts to establish the validity of drone operators as victims of trauma within the broader context of drone warfare. The aim of this article is to not only highlight this trauma suffered by drone operators, but to also openly address the ongoing stigma and factors that prevent them from seeking adequate mental health care. Drone operators exposed to trauma are further stigmatized and emasculated by their peers, resulting in a decrease in uptake of available mental health support. Through adopting a gendered approach, the article explores how this stigma invalidates much of the experiences and trauma suffered by drone operators, but furthermore is structured by ideas of masculinity and emasculation. Recognizing this stigma and emasculation is not only important for understanding military order and the masculinized dynamics of state violence, but vital for addressing the wider issues of trauma in drone warfare.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Military Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23337486.2021.1953738\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Military Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2021.1953738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Military Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2021.1953738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:军队中的无人机操作员越来越被认为是他们所面临的巨大压力和创伤的潜在受害者。在这种创伤的情况下,提供和获得足够的心理健康护理对于最大限度地降低患创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)等疾病的风险至关重要,道德伤害或高度的情绪困扰。通过将心理学研究和数据与批判性女权主义安全研究相结合,本文试图在无人机战争的更广泛背景下,确立无人机操作员作为创伤受害者的有效性。这篇文章的目的不仅是强调无人机操作员所遭受的创伤,还公开解决持续存在的污名和阻碍他们寻求足够心理健康护理的因素。暴露在创伤中的无人机操作员会被同行进一步污名化和阉割,导致对可用心理健康支持的接受减少。通过采用性别化的方法,文章探讨了这种污名是如何使无人机操作员所遭受的许多经历和创伤无效的,但又是如何被男性化和阉割的思想所构建的。认识到这种耻辱和阉割不仅对理解军事秩序和国家暴力的男性化动态很重要,而且对解决无人机战争中更广泛的创伤问题也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Victimhood and trauma within drone warfare
ABSTRACT Operators of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) within the military have increasingly been recognized as potential sufferers of immense stress and trauma as a result of the conditions they are exposed to. In cases of such trauma, the provision for and access to sufficient mental health care is vital to minimize risks of developing conditions such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), moral injury or high emotional distress. Through integrating psychological studies and data with critical feminist security studies, this article attempts to establish the validity of drone operators as victims of trauma within the broader context of drone warfare. The aim of this article is to not only highlight this trauma suffered by drone operators, but to also openly address the ongoing stigma and factors that prevent them from seeking adequate mental health care. Drone operators exposed to trauma are further stigmatized and emasculated by their peers, resulting in a decrease in uptake of available mental health support. Through adopting a gendered approach, the article explores how this stigma invalidates much of the experiences and trauma suffered by drone operators, but furthermore is structured by ideas of masculinity and emasculation. Recognizing this stigma and emasculation is not only important for understanding military order and the masculinized dynamics of state violence, but vital for addressing the wider issues of trauma in drone warfare.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Military Studies
Critical Military Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Critical Military Studies provides a rigorous, innovative platform for interdisciplinary debate on the operation of military power. It encourages the interrogation and destabilization of often taken-for-granted categories related to the military, militarism and militarization. It especially welcomes original thinking on contradictions and tensions central to the ways in which military institutions and military power work, how such tensions are reproduced within different societies and geopolitical arenas, and within and beyond academic discourse. Contributions on experiences of militarization among groups and individuals, and in hitherto underexplored, perhaps even seemingly ‘non-military’ settings are also encouraged. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to double-blind peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees. The Journal also includes a non-peer reviewed section, Encounters, showcasing multidisciplinary forms of critique such as film and photography, and engaging with policy debates and activism.
期刊最新文献
Sustaining (organizational) identity in times of change? Ontological security and narrative in Swedish military doctrine Understanding the military model of disability through the rulings of Colombia’s Constitutional Court Civilian ‘soft’ militarism through informal education in Israel: learning to protect and connect to the land ‘A deadly weapon aimed at our hearts’: the scope and composition of Lord Scarman’s 1981 public inquiry ‘Weapons only are not sufficient’: former Congolese soldiers’ accounts of the power of ritual practices’ in wartime
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1