普通食虫蜚蠊对环境细菌的获取方式不同,传播距离增大

Parker M. Campbell, Ryan Stork, Amber Hug
{"title":"普通食虫蜚蠊对环境细菌的获取方式不同,传播距离增大","authors":"Parker M. Campbell, Ryan Stork, Amber Hug","doi":"10.54119/jaas.2020.7404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although some researchers claim that cockroaches are masters of disease transmission, these claims have little to no scientific support. Most studies concerning cockroaches as a vector of disease only focus on the bacteria found on the body surface, not on whether cockroaches have actually transferred pathogenic bacteria via surface contact. We set out to determine if cockroaches would act as a mechanical vector for the transfer of the opportunistic pathogen, E. coli . Roaches were contaminated with Green fluorescent protein expressing E. coli (GFP-E. coli) broth by either walking the roach through a broth culture or by complete immersion in the culture. We then ran the roaches down a sterile agar track and measured the length of the glowing trail. Roaches were able to transmit E.coli , but only for a continuous distance of less than 50 cm, with the occasional sporadic colony growing after that. Roaches that were immersed in bacterial broth tracked the bacterium further than those that only walked through the solution. This suggests that while cockroaches are capable of acting as a mechanical vector, they are not capable of transporting transient flora over long distances. Future studies should explore this mechanism.","PeriodicalId":30423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The common feeder cockroach Blaptica dubia shows increased transmission distance based on mode of acquisition of environmental bacteria\",\"authors\":\"Parker M. Campbell, Ryan Stork, Amber Hug\",\"doi\":\"10.54119/jaas.2020.7404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although some researchers claim that cockroaches are masters of disease transmission, these claims have little to no scientific support. Most studies concerning cockroaches as a vector of disease only focus on the bacteria found on the body surface, not on whether cockroaches have actually transferred pathogenic bacteria via surface contact. We set out to determine if cockroaches would act as a mechanical vector for the transfer of the opportunistic pathogen, E. coli . Roaches were contaminated with Green fluorescent protein expressing E. coli (GFP-E. coli) broth by either walking the roach through a broth culture or by complete immersion in the culture. We then ran the roaches down a sterile agar track and measured the length of the glowing trail. Roaches were able to transmit E.coli , but only for a continuous distance of less than 50 cm, with the occasional sporadic colony growing after that. Roaches that were immersed in bacterial broth tracked the bacterium further than those that only walked through the solution. This suggests that while cockroaches are capable of acting as a mechanical vector, they are not capable of transporting transient flora over long distances. Future studies should explore this mechanism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54119/jaas.2020.7404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54119/jaas.2020.7404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管一些研究人员声称蟑螂是传播疾病的高手,但这些说法几乎没有科学依据。大多数关于蟑螂作为疾病媒介的研究只关注在人体表面发现的细菌,而不是蟑螂是否通过表面接触传播致病菌。我们开始确定蟑螂是否会作为机会致病菌大肠杆菌转移的机械载体。用表达绿色荧光蛋白的大肠杆菌(GFP-E)污染蟑螂。通过让蟑螂通过肉汤培养或完全浸泡在培养液中来培养大肠杆菌。然后,我们让蟑螂沿着无菌琼脂轨道运行,并测量发光轨迹的长度。蟑螂能够传播大肠杆菌,但只能传播不到50厘米的连续距离,此后偶尔会有零星菌落生长。浸泡在细菌肉汤中的蟑螂比那些只在溶液中行走的蟑螂追踪细菌的距离更远。这表明,虽然蟑螂能够充当机械媒介,但它们不能远距离运输瞬时菌群。未来的研究应该探索这一机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The common feeder cockroach Blaptica dubia shows increased transmission distance based on mode of acquisition of environmental bacteria
Although some researchers claim that cockroaches are masters of disease transmission, these claims have little to no scientific support. Most studies concerning cockroaches as a vector of disease only focus on the bacteria found on the body surface, not on whether cockroaches have actually transferred pathogenic bacteria via surface contact. We set out to determine if cockroaches would act as a mechanical vector for the transfer of the opportunistic pathogen, E. coli . Roaches were contaminated with Green fluorescent protein expressing E. coli (GFP-E. coli) broth by either walking the roach through a broth culture or by complete immersion in the culture. We then ran the roaches down a sterile agar track and measured the length of the glowing trail. Roaches were able to transmit E.coli , but only for a continuous distance of less than 50 cm, with the occasional sporadic colony growing after that. Roaches that were immersed in bacterial broth tracked the bacterium further than those that only walked through the solution. This suggests that while cockroaches are capable of acting as a mechanical vector, they are not capable of transporting transient flora over long distances. Future studies should explore this mechanism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Yellow-rumped Warblers (Setophaga coronata) Sipping Sap from Sapsucker Wells Factors Affecting the Sex Ratio of White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) Fetuses in Arkansas Seasonal Testicular Histology and Acystic Lobular Spermatogenesis in the Western Lesser Siren, Siren intermedia nettingi (Caudata: Sirenidae) A Study of Dental Pathology in River Otters (Lontra canadensis) in Arkansas Distal Urogenital Anatomy in the Male Wood Frog, Lithobates sylvaticus (Anura: Ranidae)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1