僵尸印记入侵新西兰!世界其他国家该有多害怕呢?

M. Handler, Robert Burrell
{"title":"僵尸印记入侵新西兰!世界其他国家该有多害怕呢?","authors":"M. Handler, Robert Burrell","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2021.1991147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT It would be natural to suppose that once a trade mark has been expunged from the trade marks register it would cease to have legal force or effect. For many years this was indeed the position in British Commonwealth countries. However, the New Zealand Supreme Court has recently held that a trade mark whose registration has been revoked can still block a subsequent application for registration in certain circumstances. In so doing the New Zealand Supreme Court followed an earlier decision of the Singapore Court of Appeal that was to much the same effect. This article argues that these decisions are problematic on policy grounds and rest on faulty doctrinal premises. It is important to recognise these issues now, not least because there is a danger that this approach may spread to other jurisdictions, including the EU, Hong Kong, and the UK.","PeriodicalId":35148,"journal":{"name":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zombie marks invade New Zealand! How scared should the rest of the world be?\",\"authors\":\"M. Handler, Robert Burrell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14729342.2021.1991147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT It would be natural to suppose that once a trade mark has been expunged from the trade marks register it would cease to have legal force or effect. For many years this was indeed the position in British Commonwealth countries. However, the New Zealand Supreme Court has recently held that a trade mark whose registration has been revoked can still block a subsequent application for registration in certain circumstances. In so doing the New Zealand Supreme Court followed an earlier decision of the Singapore Court of Appeal that was to much the same effect. This article argues that these decisions are problematic on policy grounds and rest on faulty doctrinal premises. It is important to recognise these issues now, not least because there is a danger that this approach may spread to other jurisdictions, including the EU, Hong Kong, and the UK.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2021.1991147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2021.1991147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:人们很自然地认为,一旦商标从商标注册簿中删除,它就不再具有法律效力。多年来,这确实是英联邦国家的立场。然而,新西兰最高法院最近裁定,注册被撤销的商标在某些情况下仍然可以阻止随后的注册申请。在这样做的过程中,新西兰最高法院遵循了新加坡上诉法院早些时候的一项裁决,该裁决具有大致相同的效果。这篇文章认为,这些决定在政策上是有问题的,并且基于错误的理论前提。现在认识到这些问题很重要,尤其是因为这种做法有可能蔓延到其他司法管辖区,包括欧盟、香港和英国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Zombie marks invade New Zealand! How scared should the rest of the world be?
ABSTRACT It would be natural to suppose that once a trade mark has been expunged from the trade marks register it would cease to have legal force or effect. For many years this was indeed the position in British Commonwealth countries. However, the New Zealand Supreme Court has recently held that a trade mark whose registration has been revoked can still block a subsequent application for registration in certain circumstances. In so doing the New Zealand Supreme Court followed an earlier decision of the Singapore Court of Appeal that was to much the same effect. This article argues that these decisions are problematic on policy grounds and rest on faulty doctrinal premises. It is important to recognise these issues now, not least because there is a danger that this approach may spread to other jurisdictions, including the EU, Hong Kong, and the UK.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Blurring boundaries on ‘taking part’ in an unlawful assembly: HKSAR v Choy Kin Yue (2022) 25 HKCFAR 360 ‘The law has taken all my rights away’: on India’s conundrum of able-normative death with dignity ‘Delicate plants’, ‘loose cannons’, or ‘a marriage of true minds’? The role of academic literature in judicial decision-making Legal transplantation of minors’ contracts in India and Malaysia: ‘Weak’ Watson and a ‘misfitted’ transplant Corruption and the constitutional position of the Overseas Territories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1