{"title":"框架","authors":"P. Zielonka","doi":"10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A slight difference in the message formulation may lead to a different behavior of the recipient. This phenomenon is called the framing effect. The article describes three types of framing: the risky choice framing effect, the attribute framing effect and the goal framing effect. It has been shown that the phenomenon responsible for framing effect is, commonly occurring in humans, a strong loss aversion. Examples of the implementation of framing in various economic areas, such as price policy, taxation, or negotiation, are discussed.","PeriodicalId":37255,"journal":{"name":"Decyzje","volume":"14 1","pages":"41-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Framing, czyli efekt sformułowania\",\"authors\":\"P. Zielonka\",\"doi\":\"10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.85\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A slight difference in the message formulation may lead to a different behavior of the recipient. This phenomenon is called the framing effect. The article describes three types of framing: the risky choice framing effect, the attribute framing effect and the goal framing effect. It has been shown that the phenomenon responsible for framing effect is, commonly occurring in humans, a strong loss aversion. Examples of the implementation of framing in various economic areas, such as price policy, taxation, or negotiation, are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decyzje\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"41-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decyzje\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.85\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decyzje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
A slight difference in the message formulation may lead to a different behavior of the recipient. This phenomenon is called the framing effect. The article describes three types of framing: the risky choice framing effect, the attribute framing effect and the goal framing effect. It has been shown that the phenomenon responsible for framing effect is, commonly occurring in humans, a strong loss aversion. Examples of the implementation of framing in various economic areas, such as price policy, taxation, or negotiation, are discussed.