中国在新疆犯下种族灭绝罪有罪吗?

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Chinese Journal of International Law Pub Date : 2021-10-12 DOI:10.1093/chinesejil/jmab029
J. Slawotsky
{"title":"中国在新疆犯下种族灭绝罪有罪吗?","authors":"J. Slawotsky","doi":"10.1093/chinesejil/jmab029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. Defending human rights and preventing international crimes, such as genocide, constitute paramount imperatives of all nations. In recent years, China has been accused of genocide in the context of her policies in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (Xinjiang) with respect to the Uyghurs, an ethnic minority residing primarily in Xinjiang. Uyghurs have been summoned to housing centers located in Xinjiang where they are taught the Chinese language, sing patriotic songs, and educated on Chinese society. Uyghurs who have been released and reside outside of China and some who have sent messages while housed in these facilities have complained of mistreatment at these centers. Critics contend that China is committing genocide against Uyghurs at the housing centers (referred to by some as “concentration camps”) inspiring unofficial trials in the U.K. 2. China vigorously disputes that she is engaged in genocide and argues that the implementation of strict disciplinary policies in Xinjiang are necessary and legitimate responses to horrific terrorist attacks in Xinjiang, Beijing and other locations inside China by Uyghur separatists fueled by religious fanaticism. China argues that her Xinjiang policies target religious extremism and discharge a governmental obligation to defend security and public order as well as to ensure legal compliance with domestic law. China also claims that the policies’ intent is to promote the success of Uyghurs in Chinese society, which is the antithesis of genocide. 3. This essay will address a focused issue: are the claims that China is engaged in a genocide against the Uyghurs in Xinjiang legitimate or unfair? While allegations of genocide in Xinjiang are trendy and almost “PC”, lawyers have a particular","PeriodicalId":45438,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of International Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is China Guilty of Committing Genocide in Xinjiang?\",\"authors\":\"J. Slawotsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/chinesejil/jmab029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. Defending human rights and preventing international crimes, such as genocide, constitute paramount imperatives of all nations. In recent years, China has been accused of genocide in the context of her policies in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (Xinjiang) with respect to the Uyghurs, an ethnic minority residing primarily in Xinjiang. Uyghurs have been summoned to housing centers located in Xinjiang where they are taught the Chinese language, sing patriotic songs, and educated on Chinese society. Uyghurs who have been released and reside outside of China and some who have sent messages while housed in these facilities have complained of mistreatment at these centers. Critics contend that China is committing genocide against Uyghurs at the housing centers (referred to by some as “concentration camps”) inspiring unofficial trials in the U.K. 2. China vigorously disputes that she is engaged in genocide and argues that the implementation of strict disciplinary policies in Xinjiang are necessary and legitimate responses to horrific terrorist attacks in Xinjiang, Beijing and other locations inside China by Uyghur separatists fueled by religious fanaticism. China argues that her Xinjiang policies target religious extremism and discharge a governmental obligation to defend security and public order as well as to ensure legal compliance with domestic law. China also claims that the policies’ intent is to promote the success of Uyghurs in Chinese society, which is the antithesis of genocide. 3. This essay will address a focused issue: are the claims that China is engaged in a genocide against the Uyghurs in Xinjiang legitimate or unfair? While allegations of genocide in Xinjiang are trendy and almost “PC”, lawyers have a particular\",\"PeriodicalId\":45438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmab029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmab029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

1.捍卫人权和防止灭绝种族等国际罪行是所有国家的首要任务。近年来,中国在新疆维吾尔自治区对主要居住在新疆的少数民族维吾尔人的政策中被指控犯有种族灭绝罪。维吾尔人被召集到位于新疆的住房中心,在那里他们学习汉语,唱爱国歌曲,并接受中国社会教育。被释放并居住在中国境外的维吾尔人,以及一些在这些设施中发送信息的人,都抱怨这些中心受到虐待。批评者认为,中国正在住房中心(一些人称之为“集中营”)对维吾尔人实施种族灭绝,这引发了英国的非官方审判2。中国强烈否认她参与了种族灭绝,并认为在新疆实施严格的纪律政策是对新疆、北京和中国其他地区维吾尔族分离主义者在宗教狂热的推动下发动的可怕恐怖袭击的必要和合法的回应。中国辩称,她的新疆政策针对宗教极端主义,履行政府保卫安全和公共秩序以及确保合法遵守国内法的义务。中国还声称,这些政策的目的是促进维吾尔人在中国社会的成功,这与种族灭绝相反。3.这篇文章将讨论一个焦点问题:关于中国对新疆维吾尔人进行种族灭绝的说法是合法的还是不公平的?虽然对新疆种族灭绝的指控很流行,几乎是“PC”,但律师们有一个特殊之处
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is China Guilty of Committing Genocide in Xinjiang?
1. Defending human rights and preventing international crimes, such as genocide, constitute paramount imperatives of all nations. In recent years, China has been accused of genocide in the context of her policies in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (Xinjiang) with respect to the Uyghurs, an ethnic minority residing primarily in Xinjiang. Uyghurs have been summoned to housing centers located in Xinjiang where they are taught the Chinese language, sing patriotic songs, and educated on Chinese society. Uyghurs who have been released and reside outside of China and some who have sent messages while housed in these facilities have complained of mistreatment at these centers. Critics contend that China is committing genocide against Uyghurs at the housing centers (referred to by some as “concentration camps”) inspiring unofficial trials in the U.K. 2. China vigorously disputes that she is engaged in genocide and argues that the implementation of strict disciplinary policies in Xinjiang are necessary and legitimate responses to horrific terrorist attacks in Xinjiang, Beijing and other locations inside China by Uyghur separatists fueled by religious fanaticism. China argues that her Xinjiang policies target religious extremism and discharge a governmental obligation to defend security and public order as well as to ensure legal compliance with domestic law. China also claims that the policies’ intent is to promote the success of Uyghurs in Chinese society, which is the antithesis of genocide. 3. This essay will address a focused issue: are the claims that China is engaged in a genocide against the Uyghurs in Xinjiang legitimate or unfair? While allegations of genocide in Xinjiang are trendy and almost “PC”, lawyers have a particular
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of International Law is the leading forum for articles on international law by Chinese scholars and on international law issues relating to China. An independent, peer-reviewed research journal edited primarily by scholars from mainland China, and published in association with the Chinese Society of International Law, Beijing, and Wuhan University Institute of International Law, Wuhan, the Journal is a general international law journal with a focus on materials and viewpoints from and/or about China, other parts of Asia, and the broader developing world.
期刊最新文献
Navigating New Waters: IMO’s Efforts to Regulate Autonomous Shipping Jurisdiction of a State Party under Article 2(1) of the ICCPR: A Comment on A.S. and Others v. Italy The 2022 ICJ Judgment in Nicaragua v. Colombia: Towards a Theory of Exclusivity in Allocating Rights and Jurisdiction between the Coastal and Other States? Interplay of International Law and Cyberspace: State Sovereignty Violation, Extraterritorial Effects, and the Paradigm of Cyber Sovereignty Military Alliances under International Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1