A型FMD疫苗剂量和免疫途径对豚鼠免疫效果影响的免疫学评价

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy Pub Date : 2021-05-31 DOI:10.5530/CTBP.2021.2.15
L. Rashmi, K. Ganesh, S. Kishore, V. Suryanarayana, G. R. Reddy, Prithvi S Shirahatti, R. Ramu
{"title":"A型FMD疫苗剂量和免疫途径对豚鼠免疫效果影响的免疫学评价","authors":"L. Rashmi, K. Ganesh, S. Kishore, V. Suryanarayana, G. R. Reddy, Prithvi S Shirahatti, R. Ramu","doi":"10.5530/CTBP.2021.2.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A study has been conducted to measure the immunization efficacy of route of inoculation between intra dermal (ID) and intra muscular (IM) in guinea pigs, using FMD vaccines. Three different vaccine formulations of varying concentrations containing full dose, 1/5th dose, 1/10th dose were prepared and injected either intra muscularly or intra dermal to six different groups of guinea pigs. At 30th day post vaccination, all the animals were challenged. Efficacy of route was defined in terms of serum neutralizing antibodies, IgG1 and IgG2 isotype response and challenge studies. When compared with guinea pigs that were intramuscularly vaccinated with a full dose vaccine, guinea pigs vaccinated intra dermal with 1/5th dose of the vaccine were 60% protected against clinical disease. Thus, we conclude that ID route is a good alternative for IM route, as ID route has shown to induce a very efficient immunological response against FMD. Moreover, the dose required by the ID route is lower compared to the IM route with an added benefit of reduced requirement of antigen and costs per dose of FMD vaccine.","PeriodicalId":10980,"journal":{"name":"Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immunological Evaluation of Influence of Dose and Route of Immunization with FMD Serotype ‘A’ Vaccine in Guinea Pigs\",\"authors\":\"L. Rashmi, K. Ganesh, S. Kishore, V. Suryanarayana, G. R. Reddy, Prithvi S Shirahatti, R. Ramu\",\"doi\":\"10.5530/CTBP.2021.2.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A study has been conducted to measure the immunization efficacy of route of inoculation between intra dermal (ID) and intra muscular (IM) in guinea pigs, using FMD vaccines. Three different vaccine formulations of varying concentrations containing full dose, 1/5th dose, 1/10th dose were prepared and injected either intra muscularly or intra dermal to six different groups of guinea pigs. At 30th day post vaccination, all the animals were challenged. Efficacy of route was defined in terms of serum neutralizing antibodies, IgG1 and IgG2 isotype response and challenge studies. When compared with guinea pigs that were intramuscularly vaccinated with a full dose vaccine, guinea pigs vaccinated intra dermal with 1/5th dose of the vaccine were 60% protected against clinical disease. Thus, we conclude that ID route is a good alternative for IM route, as ID route has shown to induce a very efficient immunological response against FMD. Moreover, the dose required by the ID route is lower compared to the IM route with an added benefit of reduced requirement of antigen and costs per dose of FMD vaccine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5530/CTBP.2021.2.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/CTBP.2021.2.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用口蹄疫疫苗对豚鼠进行了皮内接种(ID)和肌内接种(IM)途径的免疫效果测定。制备了三种不同浓度的疫苗制剂,包括全剂量、1/5剂量和1/10剂量,并将其肌肉内或皮内注射到六组不同的豚鼠身上。接种后第30天,对所有动物进行攻毒。根据血清中和抗体、IgG1和IgG2同型反应和激发研究来确定该途径的疗效。与肌肉内注射全剂量疫苗的豚鼠相比,皮肤内注射1/5剂量疫苗的豚鼠对临床疾病的保护率为60%。因此,我们得出结论,ID路线是IM路线的一个很好的替代方案,因为ID路线已显示出对口蹄疫的非常有效的免疫反应。此外,与IM途径相比,ID途径所需的剂量更低,还具有减少抗原需求和每剂口蹄疫疫苗成本的额外好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Immunological Evaluation of Influence of Dose and Route of Immunization with FMD Serotype ‘A’ Vaccine in Guinea Pigs
A study has been conducted to measure the immunization efficacy of route of inoculation between intra dermal (ID) and intra muscular (IM) in guinea pigs, using FMD vaccines. Three different vaccine formulations of varying concentrations containing full dose, 1/5th dose, 1/10th dose were prepared and injected either intra muscularly or intra dermal to six different groups of guinea pigs. At 30th day post vaccination, all the animals were challenged. Efficacy of route was defined in terms of serum neutralizing antibodies, IgG1 and IgG2 isotype response and challenge studies. When compared with guinea pigs that were intramuscularly vaccinated with a full dose vaccine, guinea pigs vaccinated intra dermal with 1/5th dose of the vaccine were 60% protected against clinical disease. Thus, we conclude that ID route is a good alternative for IM route, as ID route has shown to induce a very efficient immunological response against FMD. Moreover, the dose required by the ID route is lower compared to the IM route with an added benefit of reduced requirement of antigen and costs per dose of FMD vaccine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy
Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Association of Biotechnology and Pharmacy (ABAP) will be useful to form a forum for scientists so that they can bring together to discuss and find scientific solutions to the problems of society. The annual meetings will help the members to share their knowledge and publish their research knowledge particularly by members and fellows of the Association and special care will be taken to provide an opportunity for young scientists. Besides this the association is planned to organize symposia, seminars and workshops on current developments of Biotechnology and Pharmacy particularly on the subject of current scientific interest, and the proceedings of which will be published regularly. And in view of the vast development of science and to disseminate the problems in publication of research work, an international journal of Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy has been started by ABAP.
期刊最新文献
Improved, Efficient and Reliable Plant Regeneration Protocol for a Recalcitrant Black Rice (Oryza sativa cv. Chakhao amubi) Targeting Glucose Metabolism in Diabetes-A Homology Modeling and Active Site Identification for Inositol Monophosphatase Phytochemical, Toxicological, and Anti-Hyperglycemic Evaluation of Pennisetum purpureum in Sprague-Dawley Rats Biosorption of Zn (II) ion from Aqueous Solutions Using Nut Grass Dunaliella salina as a Protein Expression System for the Expression of the Endolysin Lysqdvp001 Against Vibrio parahaemolyticus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1