{"title":"“我们有声音,但我们不能真正说话”:跨国私有化和全球出口制造业中妇女就业的(非)正当性——以越南汉赛有限公司为例","authors":"M. Clare","doi":"10.1080/20414005.2020.1834795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper explores the transnational regulatory structures governing the experiences of women workers in a garment export manufacturing complex in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. It addresses their resistance to abuse outside the formal legal regimes of audits, grievances, and legal challenges. It then traces their experiences through the transnational regulatory framework which structures their work, as a means of testing the theorisation of emerging transnational legal models. In particular, the article will discuss the interactions of Vietnamese domestic law, international law, and private regulation by the factory owners and Nike, a prominent buyer, with respect to the specific placement of women in garment export manufacturing and their capacity to organise and gain legal relief. It concludes by stating that the privatisation of regulatory forms and procedures underway in the development of the transnational legal order significantly erodes workers’ legal rights and claim-making capacities, but countercurrents of grassroots resistance are also identifiable.","PeriodicalId":37728,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Legal Theory","volume":"11 1","pages":"454 - 483"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20414005.2020.1834795","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘We Have Voices But We Can’t Really Speak’: transnational privatisation and (de)juridification of women’s employment in global export manufacturing—a case study of Hansae Vietnam Co Ltd\",\"authors\":\"M. Clare\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20414005.2020.1834795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper explores the transnational regulatory structures governing the experiences of women workers in a garment export manufacturing complex in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. It addresses their resistance to abuse outside the formal legal regimes of audits, grievances, and legal challenges. It then traces their experiences through the transnational regulatory framework which structures their work, as a means of testing the theorisation of emerging transnational legal models. In particular, the article will discuss the interactions of Vietnamese domestic law, international law, and private regulation by the factory owners and Nike, a prominent buyer, with respect to the specific placement of women in garment export manufacturing and their capacity to organise and gain legal relief. It concludes by stating that the privatisation of regulatory forms and procedures underway in the development of the transnational legal order significantly erodes workers’ legal rights and claim-making capacities, but countercurrents of grassroots resistance are also identifiable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Legal Theory\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"454 - 483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20414005.2020.1834795\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Legal Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2020.1834795\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Legal Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2020.1834795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
‘We Have Voices But We Can’t Really Speak’: transnational privatisation and (de)juridification of women’s employment in global export manufacturing—a case study of Hansae Vietnam Co Ltd
ABSTRACT This paper explores the transnational regulatory structures governing the experiences of women workers in a garment export manufacturing complex in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. It addresses their resistance to abuse outside the formal legal regimes of audits, grievances, and legal challenges. It then traces their experiences through the transnational regulatory framework which structures their work, as a means of testing the theorisation of emerging transnational legal models. In particular, the article will discuss the interactions of Vietnamese domestic law, international law, and private regulation by the factory owners and Nike, a prominent buyer, with respect to the specific placement of women in garment export manufacturing and their capacity to organise and gain legal relief. It concludes by stating that the privatisation of regulatory forms and procedures underway in the development of the transnational legal order significantly erodes workers’ legal rights and claim-making capacities, but countercurrents of grassroots resistance are also identifiable.
期刊介绍:
The objective of Transnational Legal Theory is to publish high-quality theoretical scholarship that addresses transnational dimensions of law and legal dimensions of transnational fields and activity. Central to Transnational Legal Theory''s mandate is publication of work that explores whether and how transnational contexts, forces and ideations affect debates within existing traditions or schools of legal thought. Similarly, the journal aspires to encourage scholars debating general theories about law to consider the relevance of transnational contexts and dimensions for their work. With respect to particular jurisprudence, the journal welcomes not only submissions that involve theoretical explorations of fields commonly constructed as transnational in nature (such as commercial law, maritime law, or cyberlaw) but also explorations of transnational aspects of fields less commonly understood in this way (for example, criminal law, family law, company law, tort law, evidence law, and so on). Submissions of work exploring process-oriented approaches to law as transnational (from transjurisdictional litigation to delocalized arbitration to multi-level governance) are also encouraged. Equally central to Transnational Legal Theory''s mandate is theoretical work that explores fresh (or revived) understandings of international law and comparative law ''beyond the state'' (and the interstate). The journal has a special interest in submissions that explore the interfaces, intersections, and mutual embeddedness of public international law, private international law, and comparative law, notably in terms of whether such inter-relationships are reshaping these sub-disciplines in directions that are, in important respects, transnational in nature.