教育干预对医学生研究参与感知障碍的影响:一项初步研究

Elizabeth Eichman, Jake Sellers, L. Cobbs
{"title":"教育干预对医学生研究参与感知障碍的影响:一项初步研究","authors":"Elizabeth Eichman, Jake Sellers, L. Cobbs","doi":"10.12688/mep.19465.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Competency in research as a medical student is a core skill set in training to be a physician and also supports effective continuing education as a physician. Although it is highlighted as an expected competency for educating medical students, there are no specific requirements on the type or depth of educational content that should be offered in the area of research skills for medical students. This observation led us to explore the potential benefits of informative lectures on research fundamentals and their impact on medical students’ perceptions on conducting research in school. Methods: In this study, students were surveyed before (n=71) and after (n=33) formal lectures on research principles to exam changes in perceived barriers to participating in research related activities. Barriers were categorized into three categories: Personal; Competency; and Value. Results: The results of this study demonstrated significantly decreased perception of several barriers within the personal and competency categories after the lecture series on research principles was completed. Although statistically insignificant, a separate and possibly interesting observation is that respondents appeared to have a decreased interest in research and decreased perception that participating in research would add value to their profile as a residency applicant or impact their care of patients as a future physician. Conclusions: Our pilot study suggests that offering formal lectures on research principles may lead to decreased perceived barriers of medical students in becoming involved in research related activities during medical school.","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of educational intervention on perceived barriers toward medical student research involvement: A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Eichman, Jake Sellers, L. Cobbs\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/mep.19465.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Competency in research as a medical student is a core skill set in training to be a physician and also supports effective continuing education as a physician. Although it is highlighted as an expected competency for educating medical students, there are no specific requirements on the type or depth of educational content that should be offered in the area of research skills for medical students. This observation led us to explore the potential benefits of informative lectures on research fundamentals and their impact on medical students’ perceptions on conducting research in school. Methods: In this study, students were surveyed before (n=71) and after (n=33) formal lectures on research principles to exam changes in perceived barriers to participating in research related activities. Barriers were categorized into three categories: Personal; Competency; and Value. Results: The results of this study demonstrated significantly decreased perception of several barriers within the personal and competency categories after the lecture series on research principles was completed. Although statistically insignificant, a separate and possibly interesting observation is that respondents appeared to have a decreased interest in research and decreased perception that participating in research would add value to their profile as a residency applicant or impact their care of patients as a future physician. Conclusions: Our pilot study suggests that offering formal lectures on research principles may lead to decreased perceived barriers of medical students in becoming involved in research related activities during medical school.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19465.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19465.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:作为一名医学生,研究能力是培训成为一名医生的核心技能,也支持作为一名医生进行有效的继续教育。尽管它被强调为医学生教育的预期能力,但在医学生研究技能领域,对教育内容的类型或深度没有具体要求。这一观察结果使我们探索了研究基础知识讲座的潜在好处,以及它们对医学生在学校进行研究的看法的影响。方法:在本研究中,对学生在正式讲座之前(n=71)和之后(n=33)进行了调查,内容涉及研究原则,以测试参与研究相关活动的感知障碍的变化。障碍分为三类:个人障碍;能力;和价值。结果:本研究的结果表明,在研究原理系列讲座结束后,对个人和能力类别中的几个障碍的感知显著降低。尽管在统计上微不足道,但另一个可能有趣的观察结果是,受访者似乎对研究的兴趣下降,对参与研究会为他们作为住院申请人的形象增加价值或影响他们作为未来医生对患者的护理的看法下降。结论:我们的试点研究表明,提供关于研究原理的正式讲座可能会减少医学生在医学院期间参与研究相关活动的感知障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of educational intervention on perceived barriers toward medical student research involvement: A pilot study
Background: Competency in research as a medical student is a core skill set in training to be a physician and also supports effective continuing education as a physician. Although it is highlighted as an expected competency for educating medical students, there are no specific requirements on the type or depth of educational content that should be offered in the area of research skills for medical students. This observation led us to explore the potential benefits of informative lectures on research fundamentals and their impact on medical students’ perceptions on conducting research in school. Methods: In this study, students were surveyed before (n=71) and after (n=33) formal lectures on research principles to exam changes in perceived barriers to participating in research related activities. Barriers were categorized into three categories: Personal; Competency; and Value. Results: The results of this study demonstrated significantly decreased perception of several barriers within the personal and competency categories after the lecture series on research principles was completed. Although statistically insignificant, a separate and possibly interesting observation is that respondents appeared to have a decreased interest in research and decreased perception that participating in research would add value to their profile as a residency applicant or impact their care of patients as a future physician. Conclusions: Our pilot study suggests that offering formal lectures on research principles may lead to decreased perceived barriers of medical students in becoming involved in research related activities during medical school.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊最新文献
Medical students' knowledge on palliative care - a survey of teaching in Finland. Developing a clinician-friendly rubric for assessing history-taking skills in medical undergraduates speaking English as a foreign language. A retrospective feedback analysis of objective structured clinical examination performance of undergraduate medical students. Guidelines for Integrating actionable A-SMART Learning Outcomes into the Backward Design Process. Practical tips for teaching medicine in the metaverse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1