指数空间结构中小面积估计的抽样方差估计方法及精度

Y. Mehrabi, A. Kavousi, M. Soltani-Kermanshahi
{"title":"指数空间结构中小面积估计的抽样方差估计方法及精度","authors":"Y. Mehrabi, A. Kavousi, M. Soltani-Kermanshahi","doi":"10.18502/jbe.v8i3.12287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In various practical applications, neighbouring small area data have spatial correlation. More recently, an extension of the Fay–Herriot model through the spatial (exponential) has been considered. This spatial area-level model like the fundamental area-level model (was first suggested by Fay III and Herriot) has a powerful assumption of known sampling variance. Several methods have been suggested for smoothing of sampling variance and there is no unique method for sampling variance estimation, more studies need. \nMethods: This research examines four techniques for sampling variance estimates including of Direct, Probability Distribution, Bayes and Bootstrap methods. We used households’ food expenditures (HFE) data 2013 and other socio-economic ancillary data to fit the read model and at last conduct a simulation study based on this data to compare the effects of four variance estimation methods on precision of small area estimates. \nResults: The best model on real data showed that the lowest and the highest HFE belonged to Pishva district (in Tehran province) with 26,707 thousand rials (TRs) and Omidiyeh (in Khouzestan province) with 101,961 TRs, respectively. Accordingly on simulation study, the probability distribution and direct methods, respectively and approximately had the smallest and the highest Root Average Mean Square Errors (RAMSE) for all conditions. \nConclusion: The results showed the best fitting with direct method in real data and best precision with Probability Distribution method in simulation study.","PeriodicalId":34310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sampling Variance Estimation Method and Precision of Small Area Estimation in the Exponential Spatial Structure\",\"authors\":\"Y. Mehrabi, A. Kavousi, M. Soltani-Kermanshahi\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jbe.v8i3.12287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: In various practical applications, neighbouring small area data have spatial correlation. More recently, an extension of the Fay–Herriot model through the spatial (exponential) has been considered. This spatial area-level model like the fundamental area-level model (was first suggested by Fay III and Herriot) has a powerful assumption of known sampling variance. Several methods have been suggested for smoothing of sampling variance and there is no unique method for sampling variance estimation, more studies need. \\nMethods: This research examines four techniques for sampling variance estimates including of Direct, Probability Distribution, Bayes and Bootstrap methods. We used households’ food expenditures (HFE) data 2013 and other socio-economic ancillary data to fit the read model and at last conduct a simulation study based on this data to compare the effects of four variance estimation methods on precision of small area estimates. \\nResults: The best model on real data showed that the lowest and the highest HFE belonged to Pishva district (in Tehran province) with 26,707 thousand rials (TRs) and Omidiyeh (in Khouzestan province) with 101,961 TRs, respectively. Accordingly on simulation study, the probability distribution and direct methods, respectively and approximately had the smallest and the highest Root Average Mean Square Errors (RAMSE) for all conditions. \\nConclusion: The results showed the best fitting with direct method in real data and best precision with Probability Distribution method in simulation study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v8i3.12287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v8i3.12287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在各种实际应用中,相邻的小区域数据具有空间相关性。最近,人们考虑将Fay–Herriot模型扩展到空间(指数)。这种空间区域水平模型与基本区域水平模型(由Fay III和Herriot首次提出)一样,具有已知采样方差的强大假设。已经提出了几种平滑采样方差的方法,但没有唯一的方法来估计采样方差,需要更多的研究。方法:本研究考察了四种抽样方差估计技术,包括直接法、概率分布法、贝叶斯方法和Bootstrap方法。我们使用2013年家庭食品支出(HFE)数据和其他社会经济辅助数据来拟合读取的模型,并最终基于这些数据进行了模拟研究,以比较四种方差估计方法对小面积估计精度的影响。结果:基于真实数据的最佳模型显示,最低和最高的HFE分别属于皮什瓦区(德黑兰省),有26707千里亚尔(TR)和奥米迪耶区(Khouzestan省),分别有101961个TR。因此,在模拟研究中,概率分布和直接方法分别和近似地在所有条件下具有最小和最高的均方根误差(RAMSE)。结论:在模拟研究中,直接法拟合效果最好,概率分布法拟合精度最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sampling Variance Estimation Method and Precision of Small Area Estimation in the Exponential Spatial Structure
Introduction: In various practical applications, neighbouring small area data have spatial correlation. More recently, an extension of the Fay–Herriot model through the spatial (exponential) has been considered. This spatial area-level model like the fundamental area-level model (was first suggested by Fay III and Herriot) has a powerful assumption of known sampling variance. Several methods have been suggested for smoothing of sampling variance and there is no unique method for sampling variance estimation, more studies need. Methods: This research examines four techniques for sampling variance estimates including of Direct, Probability Distribution, Bayes and Bootstrap methods. We used households’ food expenditures (HFE) data 2013 and other socio-economic ancillary data to fit the read model and at last conduct a simulation study based on this data to compare the effects of four variance estimation methods on precision of small area estimates. Results: The best model on real data showed that the lowest and the highest HFE belonged to Pishva district (in Tehran province) with 26,707 thousand rials (TRs) and Omidiyeh (in Khouzestan province) with 101,961 TRs, respectively. Accordingly on simulation study, the probability distribution and direct methods, respectively and approximately had the smallest and the highest Root Average Mean Square Errors (RAMSE) for all conditions. Conclusion: The results showed the best fitting with direct method in real data and best precision with Probability Distribution method in simulation study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Copula Frailty defective models in presence of Cure Fraction The Pattern of Motorcyclists' Death Due to Accidents and a Three-year Forecast in East Azerbaijan Province, Iran: A Time Series Study Factors Affecting Loneliness in Older Adults: Evidence from Ardakan Cohort Study on Aging (ACSA) Understanding Knowledge and Behaviors Related To the Covid-19 Epidemic in Medical Students in Morocco Survival Prognostic Factors of Male Breast Cancer Using Appropriate Survival Analysis for Small Sample Size: Three Center Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1