K. Oechsle, J. Ehlert, Y. Kodolitsch, A. Ullrich, C. Bokemeyer, M. Rybczynski
{"title":"慢性心力衰竭患者姑息治疗需求的自我评估和筛查","authors":"K. Oechsle, J. Ehlert, Y. Kodolitsch, A. Ullrich, C. Bokemeyer, M. Rybczynski","doi":"10.4172/2165-7386.1000304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) rarely receive palliative care today. \nMethods: In a cross-sectional pilot study we evaluated feasibility of self-assessment and physician-directed \n screening for palliative care need in CHF patients. Patients answered German versions of the “Minimal \n Documentation system for patients in palliative care” (MIDOS), “Distress-Thermometer” (DT), and the “Patient \n Health Questionnaire” (PHQ4). A modified version of the “Five-Item Palliative Care Screening Tool” was used to \n screen for palliative care need by the treating cardiologists. \nResults: 218 patients were asked to participate and 148 (67%) completed all questionnaires. Median symptom \n burden (MIDOS) was 7 out of 30 points (SD 4.868), overall wellbeing was two of 5 (SD 0.902), and median distress \n score was 6 of 10 (SD 2.318). Most frequent moderate or severe symptoms were dyspnea (52%), weakness (51%), \n and tiredness (49%). Significant distress (DT score>5) was indicated by 106 patients (72%). Exhaustion (79%), \n sleeping problems (75%), and problems with breathing (69%) were most frequent problems. Only 11% and 14% of \n patients presented with significant anxiety and depression, respectively (PHQ4-score>3). \nPalliative care need was scored with mean 6.8 out of 12 points (SD 2.223). Using a cut-off value of >5, 113 \n patients (76%) would have needed palliative care. Objective parameters for palliative care need (symptom burden \n 43%, distress 68%, decision-making 67%) were indicated, but request for palliative care by the patients, their \n relatives (5%) or the cardiology team (5%) was rare. Symptom burden and palliative care screening showed \n significant, but not clinically relevant interaction. \nConclusion: This pilot study, feasibility of palliative care self-assessment and the modified screening instrument \n could be demonstrated in CHF patients. For comprehensive screening, both perspectives have to be included. First \n results indicate significant symptom burden, psychological distress and a high need for additional palliative care in \n CHF patients.","PeriodicalId":91127,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative care & medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2165-7386.1000304","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-assessment and Screening for Palliative Care Need in Patients with ChronicHeart Failure\",\"authors\":\"K. Oechsle, J. Ehlert, Y. Kodolitsch, A. Ullrich, C. Bokemeyer, M. Rybczynski\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2165-7386.1000304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) rarely receive palliative care today. \\nMethods: In a cross-sectional pilot study we evaluated feasibility of self-assessment and physician-directed \\n screening for palliative care need in CHF patients. Patients answered German versions of the “Minimal \\n Documentation system for patients in palliative care” (MIDOS), “Distress-Thermometer” (DT), and the “Patient \\n Health Questionnaire” (PHQ4). A modified version of the “Five-Item Palliative Care Screening Tool” was used to \\n screen for palliative care need by the treating cardiologists. \\nResults: 218 patients were asked to participate and 148 (67%) completed all questionnaires. Median symptom \\n burden (MIDOS) was 7 out of 30 points (SD 4.868), overall wellbeing was two of 5 (SD 0.902), and median distress \\n score was 6 of 10 (SD 2.318). Most frequent moderate or severe symptoms were dyspnea (52%), weakness (51%), \\n and tiredness (49%). Significant distress (DT score>5) was indicated by 106 patients (72%). Exhaustion (79%), \\n sleeping problems (75%), and problems with breathing (69%) were most frequent problems. Only 11% and 14% of \\n patients presented with significant anxiety and depression, respectively (PHQ4-score>3). \\nPalliative care need was scored with mean 6.8 out of 12 points (SD 2.223). Using a cut-off value of >5, 113 \\n patients (76%) would have needed palliative care. Objective parameters for palliative care need (symptom burden \\n 43%, distress 68%, decision-making 67%) were indicated, but request for palliative care by the patients, their \\n relatives (5%) or the cardiology team (5%) was rare. Symptom burden and palliative care screening showed \\n significant, but not clinically relevant interaction. \\nConclusion: This pilot study, feasibility of palliative care self-assessment and the modified screening instrument \\n could be demonstrated in CHF patients. For comprehensive screening, both perspectives have to be included. First \\n results indicate significant symptom burden, psychological distress and a high need for additional palliative care in \\n CHF patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of palliative care & medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2165-7386.1000304\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of palliative care & medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7386.1000304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative care & medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7386.1000304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Self-assessment and Screening for Palliative Care Need in Patients with ChronicHeart Failure
Objective: Patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) rarely receive palliative care today.
Methods: In a cross-sectional pilot study we evaluated feasibility of self-assessment and physician-directed
screening for palliative care need in CHF patients. Patients answered German versions of the “Minimal
Documentation system for patients in palliative care” (MIDOS), “Distress-Thermometer” (DT), and the “Patient
Health Questionnaire” (PHQ4). A modified version of the “Five-Item Palliative Care Screening Tool” was used to
screen for palliative care need by the treating cardiologists.
Results: 218 patients were asked to participate and 148 (67%) completed all questionnaires. Median symptom
burden (MIDOS) was 7 out of 30 points (SD 4.868), overall wellbeing was two of 5 (SD 0.902), and median distress
score was 6 of 10 (SD 2.318). Most frequent moderate or severe symptoms were dyspnea (52%), weakness (51%),
and tiredness (49%). Significant distress (DT score>5) was indicated by 106 patients (72%). Exhaustion (79%),
sleeping problems (75%), and problems with breathing (69%) were most frequent problems. Only 11% and 14% of
patients presented with significant anxiety and depression, respectively (PHQ4-score>3).
Palliative care need was scored with mean 6.8 out of 12 points (SD 2.223). Using a cut-off value of >5, 113
patients (76%) would have needed palliative care. Objective parameters for palliative care need (symptom burden
43%, distress 68%, decision-making 67%) were indicated, but request for palliative care by the patients, their
relatives (5%) or the cardiology team (5%) was rare. Symptom burden and palliative care screening showed
significant, but not clinically relevant interaction.
Conclusion: This pilot study, feasibility of palliative care self-assessment and the modified screening instrument
could be demonstrated in CHF patients. For comprehensive screening, both perspectives have to be included. First
results indicate significant symptom burden, psychological distress and a high need for additional palliative care in
CHF patients.