基于深度学习的基于语义分割的具体缺陷分类与检测

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Structural Health Monitoring-An International Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-02 DOI:10.1177/14759217231168212
Palisa Arafin, Ahm Muntasir Billah, Anas Issa
{"title":"基于深度学习的基于语义分割的具体缺陷分类与检测","authors":"Palisa Arafin, Ahm Muntasir Billah, Anas Issa","doi":"10.1177/14759217231168212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visual damage detection of infrastructure using deep learning (DL)-based computational approaches can facilitate a potential solution to reduce subjectivity yet increase the accuracy of the damage diagnoses and accessibility in a structural health monitoring (SHM) system. However, despite remarkable advances with DL-based SHM, the most significant challenges to achieving the real-time implication are the limited available defects image databases and the selection of DL networks depth. To address these challenges, this research has created a diverse dataset with concrete crack (4087) and spalling (1100) images and used it for damage condition assessment by applying convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms. CNN-classifier models are used to identify different types of defects and semantic segmentation for labeling the defect patterns within an image. Three CNN-based models-Visual Geometry Group (VGG)19, ResNet50, and InceptionV3 are incorporated as CNN-classifiers. For semantic segmentation, two encoder-decoder models, U-Net and pyramid scene parsing network architecture are developed based on four backbone models, including VGG19, ResNet50, InceptionV3, and EfficientNetB3. The CNN-classifier models are analyzed on two optimizers-stochastic gradient descent (SGD), root mean square propagation (RMSprop), and learning rates-0.1, 0.001, and 0.0001. However, the CNN-segmentation models are analyzed for SGD and adaptive moment estimation, trained with three different learning rates-0.1, 0.01, and 0.0001, and evaluated based on accuracy, intersection over union, precision, recall, and F1-score. InceptionV3 achieves the best performance for defects classification with an accuracy of 91.98% using the RMSprop optimizer. For crack segmentation, EfficientNetB3-based U-Net, and for spalling segmentation, IncenptionV3-based U-Net model outperformed all other algorithms, with an F1-score of 95.66 and 89.43%, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":51184,"journal":{"name":"Structural Health Monitoring-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10700060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning-based concrete defects classification and detection using semantic segmentation.\",\"authors\":\"Palisa Arafin, Ahm Muntasir Billah, Anas Issa\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14759217231168212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Visual damage detection of infrastructure using deep learning (DL)-based computational approaches can facilitate a potential solution to reduce subjectivity yet increase the accuracy of the damage diagnoses and accessibility in a structural health monitoring (SHM) system. However, despite remarkable advances with DL-based SHM, the most significant challenges to achieving the real-time implication are the limited available defects image databases and the selection of DL networks depth. To address these challenges, this research has created a diverse dataset with concrete crack (4087) and spalling (1100) images and used it for damage condition assessment by applying convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms. CNN-classifier models are used to identify different types of defects and semantic segmentation for labeling the defect patterns within an image. Three CNN-based models-Visual Geometry Group (VGG)19, ResNet50, and InceptionV3 are incorporated as CNN-classifiers. For semantic segmentation, two encoder-decoder models, U-Net and pyramid scene parsing network architecture are developed based on four backbone models, including VGG19, ResNet50, InceptionV3, and EfficientNetB3. The CNN-classifier models are analyzed on two optimizers-stochastic gradient descent (SGD), root mean square propagation (RMSprop), and learning rates-0.1, 0.001, and 0.0001. However, the CNN-segmentation models are analyzed for SGD and adaptive moment estimation, trained with three different learning rates-0.1, 0.01, and 0.0001, and evaluated based on accuracy, intersection over union, precision, recall, and F1-score. InceptionV3 achieves the best performance for defects classification with an accuracy of 91.98% using the RMSprop optimizer. For crack segmentation, EfficientNetB3-based U-Net, and for spalling segmentation, IncenptionV3-based U-Net model outperformed all other algorithms, with an F1-score of 95.66 and 89.43%, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structural Health Monitoring-An International Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10700060/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structural Health Monitoring-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217231168212\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Health Monitoring-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217231168212","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在结构健康监测(SHM)系统中,使用基于深度学习(DL)的计算方法对基础设施进行视觉损伤检测可以提供一种潜在的解决方案,以减少主观性,同时提高损伤诊断的准确性和可及性。然而,尽管基于DL的SHM取得了显著进展,但实现实时含义的最大挑战是有限的可用缺陷图像数据库和DL网络深度的选择。为了解决这些挑战,本研究创建了一个包含混凝土裂缝(4087)和剥落(1100)图像的多样化数据集,并通过应用卷积神经网络(CNN)算法将其用于损伤状况评估。使用cnn分类器模型来识别不同类型的缺陷,并对图像中的缺陷模式进行语义分割。三个基于cnn的模型-视觉几何组(VGG)19, ResNet50和InceptionV3被纳入cnn分类器。在语义分割方面,基于VGG19、ResNet50、InceptionV3和EfficientNetB3四个骨干模型,开发了U-Net和金字塔场景解析网络架构两种编解码器模型。cnn分类器模型在两个优化器上进行了分析——随机梯度下降(SGD)、均方根传播(RMSprop)和学习率- 0.1、0.001和0.0001。然而,我们对cnn分割模型进行了SGD和自适应矩估计分析,用三种不同的学习率(0.1、0.01和0.0001)进行训练,并根据准确率、交叉优于联合、精度、召回率和f1分数进行评估。使用RMSprop优化器,InceptionV3实现了缺陷分类的最佳性能,准确率为91.98%。对于裂缝分割,基于efficientnetb3的U-Net模型和基于incenptionv3的U-Net模型均优于其他算法,分别达到了95.66和89.43%的f1分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep learning-based concrete defects classification and detection using semantic segmentation.

Visual damage detection of infrastructure using deep learning (DL)-based computational approaches can facilitate a potential solution to reduce subjectivity yet increase the accuracy of the damage diagnoses and accessibility in a structural health monitoring (SHM) system. However, despite remarkable advances with DL-based SHM, the most significant challenges to achieving the real-time implication are the limited available defects image databases and the selection of DL networks depth. To address these challenges, this research has created a diverse dataset with concrete crack (4087) and spalling (1100) images and used it for damage condition assessment by applying convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms. CNN-classifier models are used to identify different types of defects and semantic segmentation for labeling the defect patterns within an image. Three CNN-based models-Visual Geometry Group (VGG)19, ResNet50, and InceptionV3 are incorporated as CNN-classifiers. For semantic segmentation, two encoder-decoder models, U-Net and pyramid scene parsing network architecture are developed based on four backbone models, including VGG19, ResNet50, InceptionV3, and EfficientNetB3. The CNN-classifier models are analyzed on two optimizers-stochastic gradient descent (SGD), root mean square propagation (RMSprop), and learning rates-0.1, 0.001, and 0.0001. However, the CNN-segmentation models are analyzed for SGD and adaptive moment estimation, trained with three different learning rates-0.1, 0.01, and 0.0001, and evaluated based on accuracy, intersection over union, precision, recall, and F1-score. InceptionV3 achieves the best performance for defects classification with an accuracy of 91.98% using the RMSprop optimizer. For crack segmentation, EfficientNetB3-based U-Net, and for spalling segmentation, IncenptionV3-based U-Net model outperformed all other algorithms, with an F1-score of 95.66 and 89.43%, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
181
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Structural Health Monitoring is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research that contain theoretical, analytical, and experimental investigations that advance the body of knowledge and its application in the discipline of structural health monitoring.
期刊最新文献
Deep learning-based obstacle-avoiding autonomous UAVs with fiducial marker-based localization for structural health monitoring. Deep learning-based concrete defects classification and detection using semantic segmentation. Combination of active sensing method and data-driven approach for rubber aging detection Distributed fiber optic strain sensing for crack detection with Brillouin shift spectrum back analysis An unsupervised transfer learning approach for rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on dual pseudo-label screening
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1