南非加强Covid-19接触者追踪的技术:人权和技术政治评估

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW South African Journal on Human Rights Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/02587203.2022.2054467
J. Klaaren, Brian Ray
{"title":"南非加强Covid-19接触者追踪的技术:人权和技术政治评估","authors":"J. Klaaren, Brian Ray","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2022.2054467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper assesses South Africa’s recent development and actual use of digital health surveillance tools from a comparative and human rights perspective. We first summarise the debate and emerging evidence regarding whether and how digital health surveillance tools could assist the public health response to the pandemic. Here, we develop a tentative integrated analysis of the intersecting human rights implications of these tools. Our assessment of South Africa’s actual use of digital health technologies to combat the pandemic then interweaves two themes. First, South Africa’s abrupt and still largely unexplained decision to abandon the original Tracing Database, while clearly in line with global trends in constraining the ambit of covid apps to preserve privacy, may have missed the opportunity to develop and deploy a more effective but still rights-protective model for digital health surveillance. Second, and conversely, South Africa’s approach to developing the Tracing Database, including its laudable and innovative oversight structure, reflects a troubling lack of engagement with relevant stakeholders, including human rights and community groups, as well as the private sector. It also reflects a limited public capacity to assess relevant technologies and to partner both with those stakeholders and the private sector in a genuine private/public space.","PeriodicalId":44989,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal on Human Rights","volume":"37 1","pages":"535 - 557"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"South Africa’s technologies enhancing contact tracing for Covid-19: A human rights and techno-politics assessment\",\"authors\":\"J. Klaaren, Brian Ray\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02587203.2022.2054467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper assesses South Africa’s recent development and actual use of digital health surveillance tools from a comparative and human rights perspective. We first summarise the debate and emerging evidence regarding whether and how digital health surveillance tools could assist the public health response to the pandemic. Here, we develop a tentative integrated analysis of the intersecting human rights implications of these tools. Our assessment of South Africa’s actual use of digital health technologies to combat the pandemic then interweaves two themes. First, South Africa’s abrupt and still largely unexplained decision to abandon the original Tracing Database, while clearly in line with global trends in constraining the ambit of covid apps to preserve privacy, may have missed the opportunity to develop and deploy a more effective but still rights-protective model for digital health surveillance. Second, and conversely, South Africa’s approach to developing the Tracing Database, including its laudable and innovative oversight structure, reflects a troubling lack of engagement with relevant stakeholders, including human rights and community groups, as well as the private sector. It also reflects a limited public capacity to assess relevant technologies and to partner both with those stakeholders and the private sector in a genuine private/public space.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal on Human Rights\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"535 - 557\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal on Human Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2022.2054467\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2022.2054467","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文从比较和人权的角度评估了南非数字健康监测工具的最新发展和实际使用情况。我们首先总结了关于数字健康监测工具是否以及如何帮助公共卫生应对疫情的辩论和新出现的证据。在这里,我们对这些工具对人权的交叉影响进行了初步的综合分析。我们对南非实际使用数字卫生技术抗击疫情的评估将两个主题交织在一起。首先,南非突然决定放弃最初的追踪数据库,这在很大程度上仍然是无法解释的,尽管这显然符合全球限制新冠肺炎应用程序范围以保护隐私的趋势,但可能错过了开发和部署更有效但仍然保护权利的数字健康监测模式的机会。其次,反过来说,南非开发追踪数据库的方法,包括其值得称赞的创新监督结构,反映出令人不安的是,缺乏与相关利益攸关方的接触,包括人权和社区团体以及私营部门。这也反映出,在真正的私人/公共空间中,评估相关技术以及与这些利益攸关方和私营部门合作的公共能力有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
South Africa’s technologies enhancing contact tracing for Covid-19: A human rights and techno-politics assessment
Abstract This paper assesses South Africa’s recent development and actual use of digital health surveillance tools from a comparative and human rights perspective. We first summarise the debate and emerging evidence regarding whether and how digital health surveillance tools could assist the public health response to the pandemic. Here, we develop a tentative integrated analysis of the intersecting human rights implications of these tools. Our assessment of South Africa’s actual use of digital health technologies to combat the pandemic then interweaves two themes. First, South Africa’s abrupt and still largely unexplained decision to abandon the original Tracing Database, while clearly in line with global trends in constraining the ambit of covid apps to preserve privacy, may have missed the opportunity to develop and deploy a more effective but still rights-protective model for digital health surveillance. Second, and conversely, South Africa’s approach to developing the Tracing Database, including its laudable and innovative oversight structure, reflects a troubling lack of engagement with relevant stakeholders, including human rights and community groups, as well as the private sector. It also reflects a limited public capacity to assess relevant technologies and to partner both with those stakeholders and the private sector in a genuine private/public space.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
77.80%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Consulting citizens: Addressing the deficits in participatory democracy Ubuntu, human rights and sustainable development: Lessons from the African Arbitration Academy’s Model Bilateral Investment Treaty Research handbook on economic, social and cultural rights Augmentative and alternative communication in the South African justice system: Potential and pitfalls The importance of litigating the right to access sufficient food: Equal Education v Minister of Basic Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1