人的性欲与欲望经济:弗洛伊德之后再读齐美尔的《金钱哲学》

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY Polish Sociological Review Pub Date : 2020-03-16 DOI:10.26412/PSR204.05
B. Markowska
{"title":"人的性欲与欲望经济:弗洛伊德之后再读齐美尔的《金钱哲学》","authors":"B. Markowska","doi":"10.26412/PSR204.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Georg Simmel’s The Philosophy of Money ([1900], 2004) contains one of the most pertinent and subtle diagnoses of modernity—a critique of economic reason moved by desire. This article shows that Simmel’s dialectic of desire has a significant affinity with Freud’s economic point of view in terms of the psychic apparatus being ruled by the pleasure principle. Considering these two libidinal economies I will focus on how the figure of homo oeconomicus transforms into homo libidinous and why money has become the symbol and form of modern life. The assumption is that money is not solely the fundamental principle of social reality—what we call hyper-modernity or late capitalism—but the reality principle as such.","PeriodicalId":44204,"journal":{"name":"Polish Sociological Review","volume":"204 1","pages":"486-498"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Homo Libidinous and the Economy of Desire:Rereading Simmel’s The Philosophy of Money after Freud\",\"authors\":\"B. Markowska\",\"doi\":\"10.26412/PSR204.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Georg Simmel’s The Philosophy of Money ([1900], 2004) contains one of the most pertinent and subtle diagnoses of modernity—a critique of economic reason moved by desire. This article shows that Simmel’s dialectic of desire has a significant affinity with Freud’s economic point of view in terms of the psychic apparatus being ruled by the pleasure principle. Considering these two libidinal economies I will focus on how the figure of homo oeconomicus transforms into homo libidinous and why money has become the symbol and form of modern life. The assumption is that money is not solely the fundamental principle of social reality—what we call hyper-modernity or late capitalism—but the reality principle as such.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Sociological Review\",\"volume\":\"204 1\",\"pages\":\"486-498\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Sociological Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26412/PSR204.05\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26412/PSR204.05","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

乔治·西美尔的《金钱哲学》([1900],2004)包含了对现代性最贴切、最微妙的诊断之一——对受欲望驱动的经济理性的批判。本文认为,齐美尔的欲望辩证法与弗洛伊德的经济学观点在精神器官受快乐原则支配的观点上有着重要的相似之处。考虑到这两种力比多的经济,我将重点讨论经济人的形象是如何转变为力比多的人的,以及为什么金钱已经成为现代生活的象征和形式。假设是,金钱不仅仅是社会现实的基本原则——我们称之为超现代性或晚期资本主义——而是现实原则本身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Homo Libidinous and the Economy of Desire:Rereading Simmel’s The Philosophy of Money after Freud
Georg Simmel’s The Philosophy of Money ([1900], 2004) contains one of the most pertinent and subtle diagnoses of modernity—a critique of economic reason moved by desire. This article shows that Simmel’s dialectic of desire has a significant affinity with Freud’s economic point of view in terms of the psychic apparatus being ruled by the pleasure principle. Considering these two libidinal economies I will focus on how the figure of homo oeconomicus transforms into homo libidinous and why money has become the symbol and form of modern life. The assumption is that money is not solely the fundamental principle of social reality—what we call hyper-modernity or late capitalism—but the reality principle as such.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The English : an Image Changing in Polish Eyes Origins of Multidimensional Class Locations in Hungary Popular Culture and Genetics:Genetics and Biotechnologies in the Movies Creative Commons Licensing and Relations of Production in the Sound Industry Managing Stigma - the Experiences of Parents of Children with Intellectual Disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1