哥伦比亚含油气盆地CO2- eor潜力的快速筛选和概率估计以及相关的地质CO2储存

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Petroleum Geoscience Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1144/petgeo2020-110
Edgar Eduardo Yáñez Angarita, V. Núñez-López, A. Ramírez Ramírez, Edgar Fernando Castillo Monroy, A. Faaij
{"title":"哥伦比亚含油气盆地CO2- eor潜力的快速筛选和概率估计以及相关的地质CO2储存","authors":"Edgar Eduardo Yáñez Angarita, V. Núñez-López, A. Ramírez Ramírez, Edgar Fernando Castillo Monroy, A. Faaij","doi":"10.1144/petgeo2020-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Estimating the oil recovery potential using CO2 (CO2-EOR) at a national level is resource-intensive at a scale that is not usually available. The aim of this study is two-fold: first, the potential for CO2 storage and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in Colombia is evaluated; and, second, the results from two different calculation methods (stochastic and deterministic) are compared when there is lack of information for a quick screening of suitable oilfields. The deterministic approach is based on expert insight and data found in the literature; while, the stochastic uses statistical data from two different databases (commercial and simulation-based results) to run a Monte Carlo simulation. Potential estimates based on typical values from the literature (deterministic) results in 277 MMbbl (million barrels) of oil and 36 Mt (million tonnes) of CO2. In contrast, a probabilistic-based method using a wide simulation database (stochastic) provides higher values of 690 MMbbl of oil and 203 Mt of CO2. Results using simulation-based and commercial project data also show significant differences. The volume of CO2 injected, which affects the recovery factor, is usually 100% hydrocarbon pore volume (HCPV) in simulation, while commercial projects have nowadays regularly increased from 30% to exceed the 100% threshold. A combination of these approaches avoids a resource-intensive estimation process and effectively provides a more realistic picture of the feasibility of applying CO2-EOR technologies. Thematic collection: This article is part of the Geoscience for CO2 storage collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/geoscience-for-co2-storage","PeriodicalId":49704,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Geoscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid screening and probabilistic estimation of the potential for CO2-EOR and associated geological CO2 storage in Colombian petroleum basins\",\"authors\":\"Edgar Eduardo Yáñez Angarita, V. Núñez-López, A. Ramírez Ramírez, Edgar Fernando Castillo Monroy, A. Faaij\",\"doi\":\"10.1144/petgeo2020-110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Estimating the oil recovery potential using CO2 (CO2-EOR) at a national level is resource-intensive at a scale that is not usually available. The aim of this study is two-fold: first, the potential for CO2 storage and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in Colombia is evaluated; and, second, the results from two different calculation methods (stochastic and deterministic) are compared when there is lack of information for a quick screening of suitable oilfields. The deterministic approach is based on expert insight and data found in the literature; while, the stochastic uses statistical data from two different databases (commercial and simulation-based results) to run a Monte Carlo simulation. Potential estimates based on typical values from the literature (deterministic) results in 277 MMbbl (million barrels) of oil and 36 Mt (million tonnes) of CO2. In contrast, a probabilistic-based method using a wide simulation database (stochastic) provides higher values of 690 MMbbl of oil and 203 Mt of CO2. Results using simulation-based and commercial project data also show significant differences. The volume of CO2 injected, which affects the recovery factor, is usually 100% hydrocarbon pore volume (HCPV) in simulation, while commercial projects have nowadays regularly increased from 30% to exceed the 100% threshold. A combination of these approaches avoids a resource-intensive estimation process and effectively provides a more realistic picture of the feasibility of applying CO2-EOR technologies. Thematic collection: This article is part of the Geoscience for CO2 storage collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/geoscience-for-co2-storage\",\"PeriodicalId\":49704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Petroleum Geoscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Petroleum Geoscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2020-110\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Geoscience","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2020-110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在全国范围内使用二氧化碳(CO2- eor)来估计石油采收率潜力是一项资源密集型的工作,其规模通常无法实现。本研究的目的有两个:首先,评估哥伦比亚二氧化碳储存和提高采收率(EOR)的潜力;其次,在缺乏信息的情况下,比较了两种不同计算方法(随机和确定性)的结果,以便快速筛选合适的油田。确定性方法基于专家的见解和文献中的数据;同时,随机使用来自两个不同数据库(商业和基于模拟的结果)的统计数据来运行蒙特卡罗模拟。基于文献中的典型值(确定性)的潜在估计结果为2.77亿桶(百万桶)石油和3600万吨(百万公吨)二氧化碳。相比之下,基于概率的方法使用了广泛的模拟数据库(随机),提供了6.9亿桶石油和2.03亿吨二氧化碳的更高值。基于模拟和商业项目数据的结果也显示出显著差异。在模拟中,影响采收率的CO2注入量通常为100%烃孔体积(HCPV),而目前的商业项目通常从30%增加到超过100%的阈值。这些方法的结合避免了资源密集型的评估过程,并有效地提供了应用CO2-EOR技术的可行性的更现实的图景。专题合集:本文是地球科学CO2储存合集的一部分,可在:https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/geoscience-for-co2-storage上获得
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rapid screening and probabilistic estimation of the potential for CO2-EOR and associated geological CO2 storage in Colombian petroleum basins
Estimating the oil recovery potential using CO2 (CO2-EOR) at a national level is resource-intensive at a scale that is not usually available. The aim of this study is two-fold: first, the potential for CO2 storage and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in Colombia is evaluated; and, second, the results from two different calculation methods (stochastic and deterministic) are compared when there is lack of information for a quick screening of suitable oilfields. The deterministic approach is based on expert insight and data found in the literature; while, the stochastic uses statistical data from two different databases (commercial and simulation-based results) to run a Monte Carlo simulation. Potential estimates based on typical values from the literature (deterministic) results in 277 MMbbl (million barrels) of oil and 36 Mt (million tonnes) of CO2. In contrast, a probabilistic-based method using a wide simulation database (stochastic) provides higher values of 690 MMbbl of oil and 203 Mt of CO2. Results using simulation-based and commercial project data also show significant differences. The volume of CO2 injected, which affects the recovery factor, is usually 100% hydrocarbon pore volume (HCPV) in simulation, while commercial projects have nowadays regularly increased from 30% to exceed the 100% threshold. A combination of these approaches avoids a resource-intensive estimation process and effectively provides a more realistic picture of the feasibility of applying CO2-EOR technologies. Thematic collection: This article is part of the Geoscience for CO2 storage collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/geoscience-for-co2-storage
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Petroleum Geoscience
Petroleum Geoscience 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Petroleum Geoscience is the international journal of geoenergy and applied earth science, and is co-owned by the Geological Society of London and the European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers (EAGE). Petroleum Geoscience transcends disciplinary boundaries and publishes a balanced mix of articles covering exploration, exploitation, appraisal, development and enhancement of sub-surface hydrocarbon resources and carbon repositories. The integration of disciplines in an applied context, whether for fluid production, carbon storage or related geoenergy applications, is a particular strength of the journal. Articles on enhancing exploration efficiency, lowering technological and environmental risk, and improving hydrocarbon recovery communicate the latest developments in sub-surface geoscience to a wide readership. Petroleum Geoscience provides a multidisciplinary forum for those engaged in the science and technology of the rock-related sub-surface disciplines. The journal reaches some 8000 individual subscribers, and a further 1100 institutional subscriptions provide global access to readers including geologists, geophysicists, petroleum and reservoir engineers, petrophysicists and geochemists in both academia and industry. The journal aims to share knowledge of reservoir geoscience and to reflect the international nature of its development.
期刊最新文献
Research on Water Flooding Front Based on Dynamic and Static Data Inversion—A case study Petroleum source rocks characterisation and depositional environment of Kimmeridgian-Tithonian Sequences, Jaisalmer Basin, Western Rajasthan, India A quantitative study of microstructure of Indian Gondwana shale: a fractal and algebraic topology approach Seismic stratigraphy of the Cretaceous post-rift in Punta del Este Basin (offshore Uruguay) and its implications for deep-water reservoirs Integrated geological and geophysical workflow for structural modelling; case study from the contraction foothills zone of the Colombian Eastern Cordillera
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1