{"title":"什么是类型学?","authors":"J. Daniélou, Heintz Michael","doi":"10.1353/atp.2021.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This brief essay appeared on the heels of the publication of Jean Daniélou's justly famous Sacramentum futuri: Etudes sur les origines de la typologie biblique (Paris: Beauchesne, 1950; Sacramentum Futuri: From Shadows to Reality. Studies in the Biblical Typology of the Fathers, trans. Wulstan Hibberd [London: Burns & Oates, 1960]) and his Bible et liturgie: La théologie biblique des sacrements et des fêtes d'après les Pères de l'Église (Paris: Cerf, 1951; The Bible and the Liturgy, trans. Michael A. Mathis [London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1960]). The former is an examination of the dynamics of typology through a series of case studies. The latter examines typology as the principle of inner coherence between Word and Sacrament in the Church's liturgical life. This short essay, heretofore unavailable in English, offers Daniélou's taxonomy of typology, derived from the case studies, and thus also offers a lens through which better to appreciate both books.","PeriodicalId":40281,"journal":{"name":"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal","volume":"25 1","pages":"332 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is Typology?\",\"authors\":\"J. Daniélou, Heintz Michael\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/atp.2021.0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:This brief essay appeared on the heels of the publication of Jean Daniélou's justly famous Sacramentum futuri: Etudes sur les origines de la typologie biblique (Paris: Beauchesne, 1950; Sacramentum Futuri: From Shadows to Reality. Studies in the Biblical Typology of the Fathers, trans. Wulstan Hibberd [London: Burns & Oates, 1960]) and his Bible et liturgie: La théologie biblique des sacrements et des fêtes d'après les Pères de l'Église (Paris: Cerf, 1951; The Bible and the Liturgy, trans. Michael A. Mathis [London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1960]). The former is an examination of the dynamics of typology through a series of case studies. The latter examines typology as the principle of inner coherence between Word and Sacrament in the Church's liturgical life. This short essay, heretofore unavailable in English, offers Daniélou's taxonomy of typology, derived from the case studies, and thus also offers a lens through which better to appreciate both books.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"332 - 337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/atp.2021.0029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/atp.2021.0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT:This brief essay appeared on the heels of the publication of Jean Daniélou's justly famous Sacramentum futuri: Etudes sur les origines de la typologie biblique (Paris: Beauchesne, 1950; Sacramentum Futuri: From Shadows to Reality. Studies in the Biblical Typology of the Fathers, trans. Wulstan Hibberd [London: Burns & Oates, 1960]) and his Bible et liturgie: La théologie biblique des sacrements et des fêtes d'après les Pères de l'Église (Paris: Cerf, 1951; The Bible and the Liturgy, trans. Michael A. Mathis [London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1960]). The former is an examination of the dynamics of typology through a series of case studies. The latter examines typology as the principle of inner coherence between Word and Sacrament in the Church's liturgical life. This short essay, heretofore unavailable in English, offers Daniélou's taxonomy of typology, derived from the case studies, and thus also offers a lens through which better to appreciate both books.