为什么叙利亚战争是一场禁止战争?

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Analecta Politica Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.18566/apolit.v10n19.a05
G. Marín
{"title":"为什么叙利亚战争是一场禁止战争?","authors":"G. Marín","doi":"10.18566/apolit.v10n19.a05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, it is argued that the war in Syria is an interdicted war and it seeks to explain the reasons for this. So far, and according to the theoretical follow-up and tracking that has been carried out to write this article, the concept of interdicted war appears as a novel concept that has not been used until today in writings referring to wars and armed conflicts. Therefore, the aim of this writing is to develop the arguments that ultimately lead to the proposition that the war in Syria is an “interdicted war”. Within these arguments, an analysis is made of the term interdiction and in what cases and in what contexts the term has been used. On the other hand, the analysis of the Syrian war, which began in 2011 and persists until today, is addressed, with a study of its most relevant variables, as well as the external actors and agendas that “interdict” said conflict. For this, written sources related to the issues addressed were consulted, which provided the necessary input to conclude that the “interdicted war” is a concept that is applied to describe what is happening in the Syrian war. Finally, the conditionality to which the internal actors of the war in Syria are subjected is what indicates that this war is an “interdicted war”.","PeriodicalId":40556,"journal":{"name":"Analecta Politica","volume":"10 1","pages":"94-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"¿Por qué la guerra en Siria es una guerra interdicta?\",\"authors\":\"G. Marín\",\"doi\":\"10.18566/apolit.v10n19.a05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, it is argued that the war in Syria is an interdicted war and it seeks to explain the reasons for this. So far, and according to the theoretical follow-up and tracking that has been carried out to write this article, the concept of interdicted war appears as a novel concept that has not been used until today in writings referring to wars and armed conflicts. Therefore, the aim of this writing is to develop the arguments that ultimately lead to the proposition that the war in Syria is an “interdicted war”. Within these arguments, an analysis is made of the term interdiction and in what cases and in what contexts the term has been used. On the other hand, the analysis of the Syrian war, which began in 2011 and persists until today, is addressed, with a study of its most relevant variables, as well as the external actors and agendas that “interdict” said conflict. For this, written sources related to the issues addressed were consulted, which provided the necessary input to conclude that the “interdicted war” is a concept that is applied to describe what is happening in the Syrian war. Finally, the conditionality to which the internal actors of the war in Syria are subjected is what indicates that this war is an “interdicted war”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analecta Politica\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"94-116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analecta Politica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18566/apolit.v10n19.a05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analecta Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18566/apolit.v10n19.a05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,有人认为叙利亚战争是一场被阻止的战争,并试图解释其原因。到目前为止,根据为撰写本文而进行的理论跟踪和追踪,阻断战争的概念是一个新颖的概念,直到今天才在提及战争和武装冲突的著作中使用。因此,本文的目的是发展最终导致叙利亚战争是一场“被阻止的战争”的论点。在这些论点中,分析了“拦截”一词,以及在什么情况下、在什么背景下使用了这个词。另一方面,对始于2011年并一直持续到今天的叙利亚战争进行了分析,研究了其最相关的变量,以及“阻止”上述冲突的外部行为者和议程。为此,咨询了与所述问题有关的书面资料来源,这些资料提供了必要的投入,以得出结论,即“被阻止的战争”是一个用来描述叙利亚战争中正在发生的事情的概念。最后,叙利亚战争的内部行动者所受的条件表明,这场战争是一场“被阻止的战争”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
¿Por qué la guerra en Siria es una guerra interdicta?
In this article, it is argued that the war in Syria is an interdicted war and it seeks to explain the reasons for this. So far, and according to the theoretical follow-up and tracking that has been carried out to write this article, the concept of interdicted war appears as a novel concept that has not been used until today in writings referring to wars and armed conflicts. Therefore, the aim of this writing is to develop the arguments that ultimately lead to the proposition that the war in Syria is an “interdicted war”. Within these arguments, an analysis is made of the term interdiction and in what cases and in what contexts the term has been used. On the other hand, the analysis of the Syrian war, which began in 2011 and persists until today, is addressed, with a study of its most relevant variables, as well as the external actors and agendas that “interdict” said conflict. For this, written sources related to the issues addressed were consulted, which provided the necessary input to conclude that the “interdicted war” is a concept that is applied to describe what is happening in the Syrian war. Finally, the conditionality to which the internal actors of the war in Syria are subjected is what indicates that this war is an “interdicted war”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Analecta Politica
Analecta Politica POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Flores Treviño, María Eugenia. Dispositivos discursivos del poder. Política, educación y género. México: Res Pública, 2021 Partidos y sistemas de partidos en América Latina. Éxito electoral y cambio político (1988- 2016) / Aldo Adrián Martínez Hernández. - Toluca, México: Instituto Electoral del Estado de México, 2022 Discurso y contrahegemonía en el Sur global: el caso de la lucha socioambiental en Chubut Etnografía de las conferencias de prensa de Andrés Manuel López Obrador y análisis de su lista de reproducción en YouTube (2018-2022) La gramaticalización del mundo y las instituciones sociales y políticas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1