规定论证、实际论证、报告论证

Pub Date : 2022-03-08 DOI:10.1075/jaic.21021.dou
Ilaria Casillo, Marianne Doury
{"title":"规定论证、实际论证、报告论证","authors":"Ilaria Casillo, Marianne Doury","doi":"10.1075/jaic.21021.dou","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article starts from the observation that, in order to ensure their legitimacy, the modes of governance in\n place in most Western democracies make more room for citizen participation in decision-making processes. The result is the\n implementation of various participatory mechanisms, many of which seek to stimulate a citizen’s argumentative expression. Based on\n a case study (the public debate on a gold mine project in French Guiana), we observe the norms that govern such participation\n processes and their implementation in the argumentative exchanges.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescribed argumentation, actual argumentation, reported argumentation\",\"authors\":\"Ilaria Casillo, Marianne Doury\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jaic.21021.dou\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article starts from the observation that, in order to ensure their legitimacy, the modes of governance in\\n place in most Western democracies make more room for citizen participation in decision-making processes. The result is the\\n implementation of various participatory mechanisms, many of which seek to stimulate a citizen’s argumentative expression. Based on\\n a case study (the public debate on a gold mine project in French Guiana), we observe the norms that govern such participation\\n processes and their implementation in the argumentative exchanges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.21021.dou\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.21021.dou","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文首先观察到,为了确保其合法性,大多数西方民主国家的治理模式为公民参与决策过程提供了更大的空间。其结果是实施了各种参与机制,其中许多机制试图激发公民的辩论表达。基于一个案例研究(法属圭亚那一个金矿项目的公开辩论),我们观察了管理这种参与过程的规范及其在辩论交流中的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Prescribed argumentation, actual argumentation, reported argumentation
This article starts from the observation that, in order to ensure their legitimacy, the modes of governance in place in most Western democracies make more room for citizen participation in decision-making processes. The result is the implementation of various participatory mechanisms, many of which seek to stimulate a citizen’s argumentative expression. Based on a case study (the public debate on a gold mine project in French Guiana), we observe the norms that govern such participation processes and their implementation in the argumentative exchanges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1