从博纳文特尔的语言小品看启示录

Q4 Arts and Humanities Franciscan Studies Pub Date : 2018-11-16 DOI:10.1353/FRC.2018.0004
J. Coyle
{"title":"从博纳文特尔的语言小品看启示录","authors":"J. Coyle","doi":"10.1353/FRC.2018.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay argues that in his Breviloquium Bonaventure expands the doctrine of trinitarian appropriation beyond its fixed scholastic frame; that he applies this expanded grammar of appropriation across the text both synchronically and diachronically, or formally in its literary structure and narratively throughout its account of salvation history; and that Bonaventure does so, or at least there are good reasons for so thinking, in response to the Joachite controversy that embattled the Franciscan Order of his time, to whose benefit he composed the Breviloquium.1 This is, then, an essay whose central task it is to investigate how a highly technical idiom of the scholastic mastertext features within Bonaventure’s particular iteration. The results are striking. There is scarcely a depth in the Breviloquium that trinitarian appropriation does not reach.2 I write with an eye to certain question marks drawn by Bonaventure scholarship. First among these questions concerns the deeply trinitarian character of Bonaventure’s thought. It’s a feature many think sufficiently obvious to be regarded as a truism.3 But it’s axiomatically true, too, as","PeriodicalId":53533,"journal":{"name":"Franciscan Studies","volume":"76 1","pages":"135 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FRC.2018.0004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appropriating Apocalypse in Bonaventure's Breviloquium\",\"authors\":\"J. Coyle\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/FRC.2018.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay argues that in his Breviloquium Bonaventure expands the doctrine of trinitarian appropriation beyond its fixed scholastic frame; that he applies this expanded grammar of appropriation across the text both synchronically and diachronically, or formally in its literary structure and narratively throughout its account of salvation history; and that Bonaventure does so, or at least there are good reasons for so thinking, in response to the Joachite controversy that embattled the Franciscan Order of his time, to whose benefit he composed the Breviloquium.1 This is, then, an essay whose central task it is to investigate how a highly technical idiom of the scholastic mastertext features within Bonaventure’s particular iteration. The results are striking. There is scarcely a depth in the Breviloquium that trinitarian appropriation does not reach.2 I write with an eye to certain question marks drawn by Bonaventure scholarship. First among these questions concerns the deeply trinitarian character of Bonaventure’s thought. It’s a feature many think sufficiently obvious to be regarded as a truism.3 But it’s axiomatically true, too, as\",\"PeriodicalId\":53533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Franciscan Studies\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"135 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FRC.2018.0004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Franciscan Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/FRC.2018.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Franciscan Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/FRC.2018.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,博纳文图拉在其《论说》一书中,将三位一体挪用学说扩展到了固定的学术框架之外;他将这种扩展的挪用语法应用于文本的共时性和历时性,或在其文学结构中正式应用,并在其对救赎历史的叙述中叙事;博纳文特尔这样做,或者至少有充分的理由这样想,是为了回应当时困扰方济各会的若阿基特争议,他创作了《Breviloquium》。1因此,这是一篇文章,其核心任务是调查博纳文特尔的特定迭代中学术大师文本的一个高度技术化的习语是如何出现的。结果是惊人的。Breviloquium中几乎没有三元主义挪用所不能达到的深度。2我写这篇文章是着眼于博纳文特尔奖学金所留下的某些问号。这些问题首先涉及博纳文图拉思想的深层三位一体性。许多人认为这是一个显而易见的特征,可以被视为真理。3但这也是不言自明的事实,因为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Appropriating Apocalypse in Bonaventure's Breviloquium
This essay argues that in his Breviloquium Bonaventure expands the doctrine of trinitarian appropriation beyond its fixed scholastic frame; that he applies this expanded grammar of appropriation across the text both synchronically and diachronically, or formally in its literary structure and narratively throughout its account of salvation history; and that Bonaventure does so, or at least there are good reasons for so thinking, in response to the Joachite controversy that embattled the Franciscan Order of his time, to whose benefit he composed the Breviloquium.1 This is, then, an essay whose central task it is to investigate how a highly technical idiom of the scholastic mastertext features within Bonaventure’s particular iteration. The results are striking. There is scarcely a depth in the Breviloquium that trinitarian appropriation does not reach.2 I write with an eye to certain question marks drawn by Bonaventure scholarship. First among these questions concerns the deeply trinitarian character of Bonaventure’s thought. It’s a feature many think sufficiently obvious to be regarded as a truism.3 But it’s axiomatically true, too, as
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Franciscan Studies
Franciscan Studies Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Guibert of Tournai's Letter to Lady Isabelle: An Introduction and English Translation John Punch's Hybrid Theory of Relations Editorial – A Word of Thanks Eric Doyle OFM: Hidden Architect of the Retrieval of the Franciscan Charism by Brenda Abbott (review) Communicating Conversion: Penitential Turn Transmission in the Early Franciscan Fraternity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1