研究农业女性化的方法论:它们告诉我们什么?

IF 1.7 4区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Progress in Development Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1177/14649934231173821
C. Farnworth, Els Lecoutere, A. Galiè, Bjorn Van Campenhout, M. Elias, M. Ihalainen, Lara Roeven, P. Bharati, Ana María González Valencia, M. Crossland, B. Vinceti, I. Monterroso
{"title":"研究农业女性化的方法论:它们告诉我们什么?","authors":"C. Farnworth, Els Lecoutere, A. Galiè, Bjorn Van Campenhout, M. Elias, M. Ihalainen, Lara Roeven, P. Bharati, Ana María González Valencia, M. Crossland, B. Vinceti, I. Monterroso","doi":"10.1177/14649934231173821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An increasing body of literature suggests that agriculture is ‘feminizing’ in many low- and middle-income countries. Definitions of the feminization of agriculture vary, as do interpretations of what drives the expansion of women’s roles in agriculture over time. Understanding whether, how, and why the feminization of agriculture is occurring requires effective research methodologies capable of producing nuanced data. This article builds on six research projects that set out to deepen narratives of feminization of agriculture by empirically exploring the dynamics and impacts of diverse processes of feminization of agriculture. The researchers working on these projects reflect on how their methodological innovations enabled them to obtain new, or more nuanced, insights into the processes of feminization of agriculture. A first insight is that the way ‘feminization of agriculture’ is defined and operationalized plays a decisive role in the evidence we produce on the process. Second, bias in data on feminization can arise unless researchers examine well-recognized gender norms that mediate whether women are acknowledged by wider society as legitimate farmers. Third, the feminization of agriculture should be understood as a non-linear continuum. Research methodologies need to be capable of capturing dynamics, complexity, as well as multiple and diverse context- and time-specific drivers. Researchers need to exercise critical awareness of such biases when they are constructing data to measure or proxy aspects of feminization to avoid significantly underestimating women’s roles in agriculture.","PeriodicalId":47042,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Development Studies","volume":"23 1","pages":"294 - 316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodologies for Researching Feminization of Agriculture: What Do They Tell Us?\",\"authors\":\"C. Farnworth, Els Lecoutere, A. Galiè, Bjorn Van Campenhout, M. Elias, M. Ihalainen, Lara Roeven, P. Bharati, Ana María González Valencia, M. Crossland, B. Vinceti, I. Monterroso\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14649934231173821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An increasing body of literature suggests that agriculture is ‘feminizing’ in many low- and middle-income countries. Definitions of the feminization of agriculture vary, as do interpretations of what drives the expansion of women’s roles in agriculture over time. Understanding whether, how, and why the feminization of agriculture is occurring requires effective research methodologies capable of producing nuanced data. This article builds on six research projects that set out to deepen narratives of feminization of agriculture by empirically exploring the dynamics and impacts of diverse processes of feminization of agriculture. The researchers working on these projects reflect on how their methodological innovations enabled them to obtain new, or more nuanced, insights into the processes of feminization of agriculture. A first insight is that the way ‘feminization of agriculture’ is defined and operationalized plays a decisive role in the evidence we produce on the process. Second, bias in data on feminization can arise unless researchers examine well-recognized gender norms that mediate whether women are acknowledged by wider society as legitimate farmers. Third, the feminization of agriculture should be understood as a non-linear continuum. Research methodologies need to be capable of capturing dynamics, complexity, as well as multiple and diverse context- and time-specific drivers. Researchers need to exercise critical awareness of such biases when they are constructing data to measure or proxy aspects of feminization to avoid significantly underestimating women’s roles in agriculture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Development Studies\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"294 - 316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Development Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934231173821\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934231173821","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

越来越多的文献表明,在许多中低收入国家,农业正在“女性化”。对农业女性化的定义各不相同,对女性在农业中的作用随着时间的推移而扩大的原因的解释也各不相同。了解农业女性化是否发生、如何发生以及为什么发生,需要能够产生细微数据的有效研究方法。本文建立在六个研究项目的基础上,这些项目旨在通过实证探索农业女性化的不同过程的动态和影响,深化对农业女性化叙事。从事这些项目的研究人员反思了他们的方法创新如何使他们能够对农业女性化的过程获得新的或更细微的见解。第一个见解是,“农业女性化”的定义和操作方式在我们提供的有关这一过程的证据中发挥着决定性作用。其次,除非研究人员检查公认的性别规范,以调解妇女是否被更广泛的社会承认为合法农民,否则女性化数据中可能会出现偏见。第三,农业女性化应被理解为一个非线性的连续体。研究方法需要能够捕捉动态、复杂性,以及多种多样的特定于环境和时间的驱动因素。研究人员在构建数据来衡量或代理女性化的各个方面时,需要对这些偏见进行批判性认识,以避免严重低估妇女在农业中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methodologies for Researching Feminization of Agriculture: What Do They Tell Us?
An increasing body of literature suggests that agriculture is ‘feminizing’ in many low- and middle-income countries. Definitions of the feminization of agriculture vary, as do interpretations of what drives the expansion of women’s roles in agriculture over time. Understanding whether, how, and why the feminization of agriculture is occurring requires effective research methodologies capable of producing nuanced data. This article builds on six research projects that set out to deepen narratives of feminization of agriculture by empirically exploring the dynamics and impacts of diverse processes of feminization of agriculture. The researchers working on these projects reflect on how their methodological innovations enabled them to obtain new, or more nuanced, insights into the processes of feminization of agriculture. A first insight is that the way ‘feminization of agriculture’ is defined and operationalized plays a decisive role in the evidence we produce on the process. Second, bias in data on feminization can arise unless researchers examine well-recognized gender norms that mediate whether women are acknowledged by wider society as legitimate farmers. Third, the feminization of agriculture should be understood as a non-linear continuum. Research methodologies need to be capable of capturing dynamics, complexity, as well as multiple and diverse context- and time-specific drivers. Researchers need to exercise critical awareness of such biases when they are constructing data to measure or proxy aspects of feminization to avoid significantly underestimating women’s roles in agriculture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Development Studies
Progress in Development Studies DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Progress in Development Studies is an exciting new forum for the discussion of development issues, ranging from: · Poverty alleviation and international aid · The international debt crisis · Economic development and industrialization · Environmental degradation and sustainable development · Political governance and civil society · Gender relations · The rights of the child
期刊最新文献
Cuban Youth: Changing Attitudes Towards Sexual and Reproductive Health How Is Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction Progressing in Terms of Development Cooperation? A Portfolio Analysis of DRR Aid The Bitter and the Sweet: Managerial Perceptions of the Well-Being of Ethiopian Female Apparel and Horticultural Workers What Do Practitioners Want from Research? Exploring Ugandan and American Development Practitioners’ Interest in Research Gender and the Multilateral Development Banks: From WID to GAD to Retroliberal WID
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1