查尔斯·怀特:人道主义的艺术与政治,1947–1956

Q2 Arts and Humanities American Communist History Pub Date : 2018-10-02 DOI:10.1080/14743892.2018.1499263
J. Murphy
{"title":"查尔斯·怀特:人道主义的艺术与政治,1947–1956","authors":"J. Murphy","doi":"10.1080/14743892.2018.1499263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Can abstract art lead to nuclear war? The idea seems farfetched, to say the least, but it had currency among postwar Marxists in the United States. In a 1953 article celebrating African-American artist, Charles White, Communist artist Hugo Gellert argued that “so-called abstract, non-objective” art—the avant-garde experiments of New York School painters like Jackson Pollock, Adolph Gottlieb, and Mark Rothko—had potentially cataclysmic consequences: “By their elimination of the human form and their negation of humanism,” Gellert wrote, “artists of this type help in their own way to condition the human mind to become reconciled to the possible annihilation of mankind. For there is a connection between destruction of the human form in the abstract and its actual atomic destruction.” However implausible, this dramatic leap from formal abstraction to atomic destruction hinged on the phrase the “negation of humanism.” Humanism served during the Cold War as the answer to what Marxist critics perceived as the “antihumanism” of nonfigurative abstract art, guilty-by-association with the wealthy patrons and elite institutions that supported it. The drawing by White accompanying Gellert’s article, Dawn of Life, represented a contrasting model of socialist humanism in its allegorical content and expressive figuration: a dove of peace released from, or alighting on, the open hands of a young black woman. The drawing appeared on the cover of Marxist monthly Masses & Mainstream in February 1953 (Figure 1), the same issue in which art and music critic Sidney Finkelstein’s essay, “Charles White’s Humanist Art,” anointed White the standard bearer for the journal’s ideology. “Compared to the infantile character of the formalist, non-objective and symbolist art,” Finkelstein wrote, “[White’s] portrayals of people have a true maturity which comes from the role he plays as a person and artist in social life.” From 1947 to 1956, White played a leading role “as a person and artist” in the social life of the radical left in New York. Beginning with his first one-person exhibition in 1947 at the progressive American Contemporary Art (ACA) Gallery, White emerged in the postwar period as the country’s preeminent socialist realist. From 1951 to 1956, he","PeriodicalId":35150,"journal":{"name":"American Communist History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14743892.2018.1499263","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Charles White: The Art and Politics of Humanism, 1947–1956\",\"authors\":\"J. Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14743892.2018.1499263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Can abstract art lead to nuclear war? The idea seems farfetched, to say the least, but it had currency among postwar Marxists in the United States. In a 1953 article celebrating African-American artist, Charles White, Communist artist Hugo Gellert argued that “so-called abstract, non-objective” art—the avant-garde experiments of New York School painters like Jackson Pollock, Adolph Gottlieb, and Mark Rothko—had potentially cataclysmic consequences: “By their elimination of the human form and their negation of humanism,” Gellert wrote, “artists of this type help in their own way to condition the human mind to become reconciled to the possible annihilation of mankind. For there is a connection between destruction of the human form in the abstract and its actual atomic destruction.” However implausible, this dramatic leap from formal abstraction to atomic destruction hinged on the phrase the “negation of humanism.” Humanism served during the Cold War as the answer to what Marxist critics perceived as the “antihumanism” of nonfigurative abstract art, guilty-by-association with the wealthy patrons and elite institutions that supported it. The drawing by White accompanying Gellert’s article, Dawn of Life, represented a contrasting model of socialist humanism in its allegorical content and expressive figuration: a dove of peace released from, or alighting on, the open hands of a young black woman. The drawing appeared on the cover of Marxist monthly Masses & Mainstream in February 1953 (Figure 1), the same issue in which art and music critic Sidney Finkelstein’s essay, “Charles White’s Humanist Art,” anointed White the standard bearer for the journal’s ideology. “Compared to the infantile character of the formalist, non-objective and symbolist art,” Finkelstein wrote, “[White’s] portrayals of people have a true maturity which comes from the role he plays as a person and artist in social life.” From 1947 to 1956, White played a leading role “as a person and artist” in the social life of the radical left in New York. Beginning with his first one-person exhibition in 1947 at the progressive American Contemporary Art (ACA) Gallery, White emerged in the postwar period as the country’s preeminent socialist realist. From 1951 to 1956, he\",\"PeriodicalId\":35150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Communist History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14743892.2018.1499263\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Communist History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14743892.2018.1499263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Communist History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14743892.2018.1499263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抽象艺术会导致核战争吗?退一步说,这个想法似乎有些牵强,但它在战后的美国马克思主义者中很流行。1953年,共产主义艺术家雨果·盖勒特在一篇颂扬非裔美国艺术家查尔斯·怀特的文章中指出,“所谓的抽象、非客观”艺术——杰克逊·波洛克、阿道夫·戈特利布和马克·罗斯科等纽约学派画家的前卫实验——可能会带来灾难性的后果:盖勒特写道:“通过消除人类的形式和对人文主义的否定,这类艺术家以他们自己的方式帮助调节人类的思想,使人类与可能的灭绝和解。”因为在抽象人类形态的毁灭和它实际的原子毁灭之间是有联系的。”无论多么令人难以置信,这种从形式抽象到原子毁灭的戏剧性飞跃取决于“人文主义的否定”这一短语。在冷战期间,人文主义被马克思主义批评家视为非具象抽象艺术的“反人文主义”,因为它与支持它的富有赞助人和精英机构有联系而感到内疚。怀特在盖勒特的文章《生命的黎明》(Dawn of Life)中所画的这幅画,以其讽喻的内容和富有表现力的形象,代表了一种对比鲜明的社会主义人文主义模式:一只和平鸽从一位年轻的黑人妇女张开的双手中被释放出来,或者落在她的手上。这幅画出现在1953年2月的马克思主义月刊《大众与主流》(mass & Mainstream)的封面上(图1),在同一期杂志上,艺术和音乐评论家西德尼·芬克尔斯坦(Sidney Finkelstein)的文章《查尔斯·怀特的人文主义艺术》(Charles White’s Humanist art)将怀特奉为该杂志意识形态的旗手。芬克尔斯坦写道:“与形式主义、非客观主义和象征主义艺术的幼稚特征相比,怀特对人物的描绘具有真正的成熟,这种成熟来自于他作为一个人和艺术家在社会生活中所扮演的角色。”从1947年到1956年,怀特在纽约激进左派的社会生活中“作为一个人和艺术家”发挥了主导作用。1947年,怀特在进步的美国当代艺术画廊(American Contemporary Art Gallery, ACA)举办了他的第一次个人画展,从此他成为战后美国杰出的社会主义现实主义画家。从1951年到1956年,他
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Charles White: The Art and Politics of Humanism, 1947–1956
Can abstract art lead to nuclear war? The idea seems farfetched, to say the least, but it had currency among postwar Marxists in the United States. In a 1953 article celebrating African-American artist, Charles White, Communist artist Hugo Gellert argued that “so-called abstract, non-objective” art—the avant-garde experiments of New York School painters like Jackson Pollock, Adolph Gottlieb, and Mark Rothko—had potentially cataclysmic consequences: “By their elimination of the human form and their negation of humanism,” Gellert wrote, “artists of this type help in their own way to condition the human mind to become reconciled to the possible annihilation of mankind. For there is a connection between destruction of the human form in the abstract and its actual atomic destruction.” However implausible, this dramatic leap from formal abstraction to atomic destruction hinged on the phrase the “negation of humanism.” Humanism served during the Cold War as the answer to what Marxist critics perceived as the “antihumanism” of nonfigurative abstract art, guilty-by-association with the wealthy patrons and elite institutions that supported it. The drawing by White accompanying Gellert’s article, Dawn of Life, represented a contrasting model of socialist humanism in its allegorical content and expressive figuration: a dove of peace released from, or alighting on, the open hands of a young black woman. The drawing appeared on the cover of Marxist monthly Masses & Mainstream in February 1953 (Figure 1), the same issue in which art and music critic Sidney Finkelstein’s essay, “Charles White’s Humanist Art,” anointed White the standard bearer for the journal’s ideology. “Compared to the infantile character of the formalist, non-objective and symbolist art,” Finkelstein wrote, “[White’s] portrayals of people have a true maturity which comes from the role he plays as a person and artist in social life.” From 1947 to 1956, White played a leading role “as a person and artist” in the social life of the radical left in New York. Beginning with his first one-person exhibition in 1947 at the progressive American Contemporary Art (ACA) Gallery, White emerged in the postwar period as the country’s preeminent socialist realist. From 1951 to 1956, he
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Communist History
American Communist History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Arise! Global Radicalism in the Era of the Mexican Revolution Arise! Global Radicalism in the Era of the Mexican Revolution , by Christina Heatherton, Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2022, 336 pp., $29.95, ISBN 978-0-5202-8787-7. “Down the Left Hand Path to Perdition”: Equity, the Actors Forum, and Anti-Communism The Palgrave Handbook of Communist Women Activists Around the World The Palgrave Handbook of Communist Women Activists Around the World , by Palgrave Macmillan, 2023, ISBN 978-3-031-13126-4. Communist Women’s Activism around the World, Part 1: Global Foremothers (Review) The Palgrave Handbook of Communist Women Activists Around the World , by Palgrave Macmillan, 2023, ISBN 978-3-031-13126-4. The Trials of Paul Novick: Israel, Zionism, and the CPUSA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1