企业社会责任和员工成果:考虑员工对企业角色的看法

IF 3.1 Q2 BUSINESS Society and Business Review Pub Date : 2023-08-14 DOI:10.1108/sbr-10-2022-0262
Kaitlyn DeGhetto, Zachary A. Russell, Charn P. McAllister
{"title":"企业社会责任和员工成果:考虑员工对企业角色的看法","authors":"Kaitlyn DeGhetto, Zachary A. Russell, Charn P. McAllister","doi":"10.1108/sbr-10-2022-0262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to investigate how employee perspectives on the role of business, specifically capitalist beliefs, affect the corporate social responsibility (CSR)–reputation–employee behavior relationship.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA conceptual model was developed, and to test the model empirically, survey data were collected over two phases from 192 working professionals. Data were analyzed in SAS using Hayes’s PROCESS approach.\n\n\nFindings\nResults of this study reveal that the positive employee outcomes (i.e. affective commitment and reduced turnover intentions), resulting from CSR, through perceived employer reputation (i.e. an employee’s perception of how others view their firm), are diminished when employees have strong capitalist beliefs.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nBuilding on the signaling and person–organization fit literatures, this study highlights the theoretical and managerial importance of recognizing employees’ ideological differences as well as the value of considering employee perceptions of reputation. Although many stakeholders value social responsibility, not all do, and a firm’s intended outcomes will vary depending on employees’ beliefs.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study demonstrates that CSR not only affects institutional-level corporate reputation, as previously studied, but also affects employees’ behaviors through “perceived employer reputation”, or employee beliefs about how other stakeholders perceive the firm. Moreover, this study highlights the importance of understanding employee differences, including ideological differences, prior to engaging in certain types of CSR.\n","PeriodicalId":44608,"journal":{"name":"Society and Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate social responsibility and employee outcomes: considering employee perspectives on the role of business\",\"authors\":\"Kaitlyn DeGhetto, Zachary A. Russell, Charn P. McAllister\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sbr-10-2022-0262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to investigate how employee perspectives on the role of business, specifically capitalist beliefs, affect the corporate social responsibility (CSR)–reputation–employee behavior relationship.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA conceptual model was developed, and to test the model empirically, survey data were collected over two phases from 192 working professionals. Data were analyzed in SAS using Hayes’s PROCESS approach.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nResults of this study reveal that the positive employee outcomes (i.e. affective commitment and reduced turnover intentions), resulting from CSR, through perceived employer reputation (i.e. an employee’s perception of how others view their firm), are diminished when employees have strong capitalist beliefs.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nBuilding on the signaling and person–organization fit literatures, this study highlights the theoretical and managerial importance of recognizing employees’ ideological differences as well as the value of considering employee perceptions of reputation. Although many stakeholders value social responsibility, not all do, and a firm’s intended outcomes will vary depending on employees’ beliefs.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study demonstrates that CSR not only affects institutional-level corporate reputation, as previously studied, but also affects employees’ behaviors through “perceived employer reputation”, or employee beliefs about how other stakeholders perceive the firm. Moreover, this study highlights the importance of understanding employee differences, including ideological differences, prior to engaging in certain types of CSR.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Society and Business Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Society and Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-10-2022-0262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society and Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-10-2022-0262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在调查员工对企业角色的看法,特别是资本主义信仰,如何影响企业社会责任(CSR)-声誉-员工行为关系。设计/方法/方法开发了一个概念模型,为了对该模型进行实证检验,在两个阶段收集了192名在职专业人员的调查数据。数据在SAS中使用Hayes的PROCESS方法进行分析。研究结果表明,当员工有强烈的资本主义信仰时,企业社会责任通过感知雇主声誉(即员工对他人如何看待公司的感知)产生的积极员工结果(即情感承诺和减少离职意愿)会减少。研究局限性/含义本研究基于信号和人-组织匹配文献,强调了认识员工意识形态差异的理论和管理重要性,以及考虑员工声誉感知的价值。尽管许多利益相关者都重视社会责任,但并非所有人都重视,公司的预期结果也会因员工的信仰而异。原创性/价值本研究表明,企业社会责任不仅会影响机构层面的企业声誉,正如之前所研究的那样,还会通过“感知雇主声誉”或员工对其他利益相关者如何感知公司的信念来影响员工的行为。此外,本研究强调了在参与某些类型的企业社会责任之前,了解员工差异(包括意识形态差异)的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corporate social responsibility and employee outcomes: considering employee perspectives on the role of business
Purpose This study aims to investigate how employee perspectives on the role of business, specifically capitalist beliefs, affect the corporate social responsibility (CSR)–reputation–employee behavior relationship. Design/methodology/approach A conceptual model was developed, and to test the model empirically, survey data were collected over two phases from 192 working professionals. Data were analyzed in SAS using Hayes’s PROCESS approach. Findings Results of this study reveal that the positive employee outcomes (i.e. affective commitment and reduced turnover intentions), resulting from CSR, through perceived employer reputation (i.e. an employee’s perception of how others view their firm), are diminished when employees have strong capitalist beliefs. Research limitations/implications Building on the signaling and person–organization fit literatures, this study highlights the theoretical and managerial importance of recognizing employees’ ideological differences as well as the value of considering employee perceptions of reputation. Although many stakeholders value social responsibility, not all do, and a firm’s intended outcomes will vary depending on employees’ beliefs. Originality/value This study demonstrates that CSR not only affects institutional-level corporate reputation, as previously studied, but also affects employees’ behaviors through “perceived employer reputation”, or employee beliefs about how other stakeholders perceive the firm. Moreover, this study highlights the importance of understanding employee differences, including ideological differences, prior to engaging in certain types of CSR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
The influence of workplace Confucian culture on employees’ organizational commitment through the modelling role of moral identities Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance: the moderating role of economic freedom The impact of flexible work arrangements on an older grieving population Mandatory CSR regime strips the competitive advantage: a comparative study of pre-post CSR mandate using the Bandwagon-bias effect theory Back to the basics: is business ethics an oxymoron?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1