利用教学协议中的研究来增强学生的综合能力学习

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Accounting Education Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100741
Thomas E. Marshall , Dawna Drum , Steven Morris , Sherwood Lane Lambert
{"title":"利用教学协议中的研究来增强学生的综合能力学习","authors":"Thomas E. Marshall ,&nbsp;Dawna Drum ,&nbsp;Steven Morris ,&nbsp;Sherwood Lane Lambert","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research presents a case-based pedagogical protocol, including an experiment, designed to maximize the utility of the integrated-competency framework in accounting. The study involves a rich learning exercise protocol requiring integrated competencies that fairly represent, in content and context, the experience of a professional engagement<strong>.</strong><span><span> The pedagogical protocol focuses on communications in the accounting industry, where research suggests potential communication disconnects. The study includes a laboratory experiment investigating how audit department communications (experimental treatment), individual attitudes, and task domain knowledge (task recall) interact to influence project participants’ perspectives of project viability and their intention to continue project development. In accordance with the pedagogical protocol, we discuss experiment findings identifying significant factors influencing decision behavior with the students in a debriefing session for self-awareness and </span>mindfulness. The debriefing session, focusing on introspection and empathy, expands the competencies generally addressed by accounting learning exercises. The experiment findings suggest the importance that the accounting profession identify the need for and complexities of effective communications across organizational units. We present the pedagogical protocol and design methodology, including leveraging social science research, as models for other educators/researchers to develop learning exercises based on the integrated-competency model to better educate and prepare our students for their future successes.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100741","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging research within a pedagogical protocol for enhanced integrated-competency student learning\",\"authors\":\"Thomas E. Marshall ,&nbsp;Dawna Drum ,&nbsp;Steven Morris ,&nbsp;Sherwood Lane Lambert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This research presents a case-based pedagogical protocol, including an experiment, designed to maximize the utility of the integrated-competency framework in accounting. The study involves a rich learning exercise protocol requiring integrated competencies that fairly represent, in content and context, the experience of a professional engagement<strong>.</strong><span><span> The pedagogical protocol focuses on communications in the accounting industry, where research suggests potential communication disconnects. The study includes a laboratory experiment investigating how audit department communications (experimental treatment), individual attitudes, and task domain knowledge (task recall) interact to influence project participants’ perspectives of project viability and their intention to continue project development. In accordance with the pedagogical protocol, we discuss experiment findings identifying significant factors influencing decision behavior with the students in a debriefing session for self-awareness and </span>mindfulness. The debriefing session, focusing on introspection and empathy, expands the competencies generally addressed by accounting learning exercises. The experiment findings suggest the importance that the accounting profession identify the need for and complexities of effective communications across organizational units. We present the pedagogical protocol and design methodology, including leveraging social science research, as models for other educators/researchers to develop learning exercises based on the integrated-competency model to better educate and prepare our students for their future successes.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100741\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575121000282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575121000282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究提出了一个基于案例的教学方案,包括一个实验,旨在最大限度地发挥综合能力框架在会计中的效用。该研究涉及丰富的学习练习方案,要求在内容和环境中公平地代表专业参与经验的综合能力。教学协议侧重于会计行业的沟通,研究表明潜在的沟通中断。该研究包括一个实验室实验,调查审计部门沟通(实验处理)、个人态度和任务领域知识(任务回忆)如何相互作用,影响项目参与者对项目可行性的看法和他们继续项目发展的意愿。根据教学方案,我们在自我意识和正念的述职会议上与学生讨论了实验结果,确定了影响决策行为的重要因素。汇报环节侧重于内省和同理心,扩展了会计学习练习通常涉及的能力。实验结果表明,会计专业识别跨组织单位有效沟通的必要性和复杂性的重要性。我们提出了教学方案和设计方法,包括利用社会科学研究,作为其他教育工作者/研究人员基于综合能力模型开发学习练习的模型,以更好地教育和准备我们的学生,为他们未来的成功做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Leveraging research within a pedagogical protocol for enhanced integrated-competency student learning

This research presents a case-based pedagogical protocol, including an experiment, designed to maximize the utility of the integrated-competency framework in accounting. The study involves a rich learning exercise protocol requiring integrated competencies that fairly represent, in content and context, the experience of a professional engagement. The pedagogical protocol focuses on communications in the accounting industry, where research suggests potential communication disconnects. The study includes a laboratory experiment investigating how audit department communications (experimental treatment), individual attitudes, and task domain knowledge (task recall) interact to influence project participants’ perspectives of project viability and their intention to continue project development. In accordance with the pedagogical protocol, we discuss experiment findings identifying significant factors influencing decision behavior with the students in a debriefing session for self-awareness and mindfulness. The debriefing session, focusing on introspection and empathy, expands the competencies generally addressed by accounting learning exercises. The experiment findings suggest the importance that the accounting profession identify the need for and complexities of effective communications across organizational units. We present the pedagogical protocol and design methodology, including leveraging social science research, as models for other educators/researchers to develop learning exercises based on the integrated-competency model to better educate and prepare our students for their future successes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Accounting Education
Journal of Accounting Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.
期刊最新文献
How a color-based teaching method has lifted grades for first-year accounting students Workbook design and controls: A framework Examining the contribution of diverse feedback perspectives during a work-integrated learning intervention Teaching accounting in the era of ChatGPT – The student perspective Key factors affecting faculty commitment toward accounting curriculum change: Differences between UAE and UK AACSB-accredited universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1