亚太地区发展中经济体和发达经济体生产率的部门分析

IF 0.8 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Indian Growth and Development Review Pub Date : 2019-08-31 DOI:10.1108/IGDR-09-2018-0091
Pami Dua, N. Garg
{"title":"亚太地区发展中经济体和发达经济体生产率的部门分析","authors":"Pami Dua, N. Garg","doi":"10.1108/IGDR-09-2018-0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe study aims to empirically investigate the trends and determinants of labour productivity of the two broad sectors –industry and services – and their components, namely, manufacturing and market services sectors, in the case of major developing and developed economies of Asia-Pacific over the period 1980-2014 and make a comparison thereof.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study uses econometric methodology of panel unit root tests, panel cointegration and group-mean full modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS).\n\n\nFindings\nThe study finds that while capital deepening, government size, institutional quality, productivity of the other sector and financial openness affect productivity of all the sectors significantly, the impact of human capital and trade openness varies across sectors in the case of developing economies. Furthermore, the impact of technological progress becomes significant in the post-liberalization reforms period in the developing economies. The study further finds that capital deepening, human capital, government size, institutional quality, productivity of the other sector, government size and trade openness are significant determinants of productivity of all sectors of developed economies under consideration. However, the impact of technological progress is stronger for manufacturing sector than services and its components. Furthermore, while both equity and debt liabilities (as measures of financial openness) influence sectoral productivity of industry and manufacturing sectors positively and significantly in case of developed economies, only equity liabilities have a significant influence on the productivity of developing economies. This may indicate existence of more developed financial markets in the case of developed economies.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study identifies important structural differences in determinants of productivity both across sectors and across developing and developed economies of Asia-Pacific.\n","PeriodicalId":42861,"journal":{"name":"Indian Growth and Development Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IGDR-09-2018-0091","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sectoral analysis of productivity in the developing and developed economies of Asia-Pacific\",\"authors\":\"Pami Dua, N. Garg\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/IGDR-09-2018-0091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe study aims to empirically investigate the trends and determinants of labour productivity of the two broad sectors –industry and services – and their components, namely, manufacturing and market services sectors, in the case of major developing and developed economies of Asia-Pacific over the period 1980-2014 and make a comparison thereof.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe study uses econometric methodology of panel unit root tests, panel cointegration and group-mean full modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS).\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe study finds that while capital deepening, government size, institutional quality, productivity of the other sector and financial openness affect productivity of all the sectors significantly, the impact of human capital and trade openness varies across sectors in the case of developing economies. Furthermore, the impact of technological progress becomes significant in the post-liberalization reforms period in the developing economies. The study further finds that capital deepening, human capital, government size, institutional quality, productivity of the other sector, government size and trade openness are significant determinants of productivity of all sectors of developed economies under consideration. However, the impact of technological progress is stronger for manufacturing sector than services and its components. Furthermore, while both equity and debt liabilities (as measures of financial openness) influence sectoral productivity of industry and manufacturing sectors positively and significantly in case of developed economies, only equity liabilities have a significant influence on the productivity of developing economies. This may indicate existence of more developed financial markets in the case of developed economies.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe study identifies important structural differences in determinants of productivity both across sectors and across developing and developed economies of Asia-Pacific.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":42861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Growth and Development Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IGDR-09-2018-0091\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Growth and Development Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/IGDR-09-2018-0091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Growth and Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IGDR-09-2018-0091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本研究旨在实证研究1980-2014年期间,亚太地区主要发展中经济体和发达经济体的工业和服务业及其组成部分,即制造业和市场服务业的劳动生产率趋势和决定因素,并对其进行比较。设计/方法论/方法本研究采用了面板单位根检验、面板协整和群均值完全修正普通最小二乘法(FMOLS)的计量经济学方法。研究发现,资本深化、政府规模、制度质量、其他部门生产率和金融开放度显著影响所有部门的生产率,就发展中经济体而言,人力资本和贸易开放的影响因部门而异。此外,在发展中经济体自由化后的改革时期,技术进步的影响变得显著。研究进一步发现,资本深化、人力资本、政府规模、制度质量、其他部门生产率、政府规模和贸易开放度是所考虑的发达经济体所有部门生产率的重要决定因素。然而,技术进步对制造业的影响比服务业及其组成部分更大。此外,尽管在发达经济体中,股权和债务(作为衡量金融开放程度的指标)都对工业和制造业的部门生产力产生了积极而显著的影响,但只有股权负债对发展中经济体的生产力有重大影响。这可能表明,就发达经济体而言,存在更发达的金融市场。原创性/价值该研究确定了亚太地区各部门以及发展中经济体和发达经济体生产力决定因素的重要结构性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sectoral analysis of productivity in the developing and developed economies of Asia-Pacific
Purpose The study aims to empirically investigate the trends and determinants of labour productivity of the two broad sectors –industry and services – and their components, namely, manufacturing and market services sectors, in the case of major developing and developed economies of Asia-Pacific over the period 1980-2014 and make a comparison thereof. Design/methodology/approach The study uses econometric methodology of panel unit root tests, panel cointegration and group-mean full modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS). Findings The study finds that while capital deepening, government size, institutional quality, productivity of the other sector and financial openness affect productivity of all the sectors significantly, the impact of human capital and trade openness varies across sectors in the case of developing economies. Furthermore, the impact of technological progress becomes significant in the post-liberalization reforms period in the developing economies. The study further finds that capital deepening, human capital, government size, institutional quality, productivity of the other sector, government size and trade openness are significant determinants of productivity of all sectors of developed economies under consideration. However, the impact of technological progress is stronger for manufacturing sector than services and its components. Furthermore, while both equity and debt liabilities (as measures of financial openness) influence sectoral productivity of industry and manufacturing sectors positively and significantly in case of developed economies, only equity liabilities have a significant influence on the productivity of developing economies. This may indicate existence of more developed financial markets in the case of developed economies. Originality/value The study identifies important structural differences in determinants of productivity both across sectors and across developing and developed economies of Asia-Pacific.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Resilience of the group lending model to a COVID-19 induced shock: evidence from an Indian microfinance fund Sociodemographic and institutional factors as determinants of access to food among rural households during COVID-19 pandemic in India Structural transformation of the Indian states: heterogeneity among them in a ten-sector economy Are we measuring the SDGs progress right? Evidence and insights from a review of India’s SDG index What explains exit in Indian manufacturing industries?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1