{"title":"大数据,小选择:用谷歌趋势预测股市","authors":"W. Fong","doi":"10.3905/jii.2017.7.4.075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Big data such as Google Trends has stimulated much interest in the use of search query volumes for predicting social, business, and financial market trends. A recent paper by Preis, Moat, and Stanley [2013] claimed that a simple trading strategy using the Google Trends keyword debt powerfully predicts the Dow Jones Industrial Average stock index one week ahead and outperforms the buy-and-hold strategy by a factor of 20. Using the same sample period used by Preis, Moat, and Stanley, we show that debt completely loses its predictive power once look-ahead bias is eliminated. We find a similar result with a more recent sample period, from 2011 to 2016. Search terms that do outperform the buy-and-hold strategy generally have no economic meaning and are most likely spurious.","PeriodicalId":36431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Index Investing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3905/jii.2017.7.4.075","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Big Data, Small Pickings: Predicting the Stock Market with Google Trends\",\"authors\":\"W. Fong\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jii.2017.7.4.075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Big data such as Google Trends has stimulated much interest in the use of search query volumes for predicting social, business, and financial market trends. A recent paper by Preis, Moat, and Stanley [2013] claimed that a simple trading strategy using the Google Trends keyword debt powerfully predicts the Dow Jones Industrial Average stock index one week ahead and outperforms the buy-and-hold strategy by a factor of 20. Using the same sample period used by Preis, Moat, and Stanley, we show that debt completely loses its predictive power once look-ahead bias is eliminated. We find a similar result with a more recent sample period, from 2011 to 2016. Search terms that do outperform the buy-and-hold strategy generally have no economic meaning and are most likely spurious.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Index Investing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3905/jii.2017.7.4.075\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Index Investing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2017.7.4.075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Index Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2017.7.4.075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
Big Data, Small Pickings: Predicting the Stock Market with Google Trends
Big data such as Google Trends has stimulated much interest in the use of search query volumes for predicting social, business, and financial market trends. A recent paper by Preis, Moat, and Stanley [2013] claimed that a simple trading strategy using the Google Trends keyword debt powerfully predicts the Dow Jones Industrial Average stock index one week ahead and outperforms the buy-and-hold strategy by a factor of 20. Using the same sample period used by Preis, Moat, and Stanley, we show that debt completely loses its predictive power once look-ahead bias is eliminated. We find a similar result with a more recent sample period, from 2011 to 2016. Search terms that do outperform the buy-and-hold strategy generally have no economic meaning and are most likely spurious.