经济因素和考夫曼创业活动指数

J. Felan, Joseph R. Bell, Sadiksha Upadhyay, Vess L. Johnson
{"title":"经济因素和考夫曼创业活动指数","authors":"J. Felan, Joseph R. Bell, Sadiksha Upadhyay, Vess L. Johnson","doi":"10.1108/jrme-11-2019-0085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to examine entrepreneurial activity in the USA and whether it supports a “pull” or a “push” theory of startup creation. The “push” theory argues that individuals are pushed into entrepreneurship by negative external forces, such as job dissatisfaction, difficulty finding employment, insufficient salary or inflexible work schedule. The “pull” theory contends that individuals are attracted into entrepreneurial activities seeking independence, self-fulfillment, wealth and other desirable outcomes.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper incorporates three well-established measures when looking at impact factors; unemployment rates, gross domestic product (GDP) and household income. The current study is unique in that it introduces the Kauffman Startup Activity Index (KSAI) as the measure of entrepreneurial activity when examining impact factors.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results of this study support the “pull” theory (or the entrepreneurial effect) of startup activity and further supports the idea that entrepreneurs look for opportunities in the marketplace, rather than being “forced” into self-employment.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nResearch is limited to having US data at the national level. Follow-up research could include parsing the data out to the state and local levels.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe results of this study suggest to the economic development community that incentives during times of economic growth could further incent entrepreneurial activity.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe tact used by the authors is unique in that it relied upon three historical variables – unemployment rates, US GDP and household income – and introduced a new variable, the KSAI, rather than the previously relied upon national startup activity data or startup activity.\n","PeriodicalId":45322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic factors and the Kauffman startup activity index\",\"authors\":\"J. Felan, Joseph R. Bell, Sadiksha Upadhyay, Vess L. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jrme-11-2019-0085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this study is to examine entrepreneurial activity in the USA and whether it supports a “pull” or a “push” theory of startup creation. The “push” theory argues that individuals are pushed into entrepreneurship by negative external forces, such as job dissatisfaction, difficulty finding employment, insufficient salary or inflexible work schedule. The “pull” theory contends that individuals are attracted into entrepreneurial activities seeking independence, self-fulfillment, wealth and other desirable outcomes.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper incorporates three well-established measures when looking at impact factors; unemployment rates, gross domestic product (GDP) and household income. The current study is unique in that it introduces the Kauffman Startup Activity Index (KSAI) as the measure of entrepreneurial activity when examining impact factors.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results of this study support the “pull” theory (or the entrepreneurial effect) of startup activity and further supports the idea that entrepreneurs look for opportunities in the marketplace, rather than being “forced” into self-employment.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nResearch is limited to having US data at the national level. Follow-up research could include parsing the data out to the state and local levels.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThe results of this study suggest to the economic development community that incentives during times of economic growth could further incent entrepreneurial activity.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe tact used by the authors is unique in that it relied upon three historical variables – unemployment rates, US GDP and household income – and introduced a new variable, the KSAI, rather than the previously relied upon national startup activity data or startup activity.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrme-11-2019-0085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrme-11-2019-0085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本研究的目的是考察美国的创业活动,以及它是否支持创业的“拉动”或“推动”理论。“推动”理论认为,个人是由负面外部力量推动创业的,如工作不满、找工作困难、工资不足或工作时间表不灵活。“拉动”理论认为,个人被吸引到创业活动中,寻求独立、自我实现、财富和其他理想的结果。设计/方法论/方法本文在研究影响因素时纳入了三个公认的措施;失业率、国内生产总值和家庭收入。目前的研究的独特之处在于,在研究影响因素时,引入了考夫曼创业活动指数(KSAI)作为衡量创业活动的指标。发现这项研究的结果支持了创业活动的“拉动”理论(或创业效应),并进一步支持了企业家在市场上寻找机会,而不是“被迫”从事自营职业的观点。研究局限性/含义研究仅限于在国家层面上获得美国数据。后续研究可能包括将数据解析到州和地方层面。社会含义这项研究的结果向经济发展界表明,经济增长时期的激励措施可以进一步激励创业活动。独创性/价值作者使用的策略是独特的,因为它依赖于三个历史变量——失业率、美国GDP和家庭收入——并引入了一个新的变量KSAI,而不是以前依赖的国家创业活动数据或创业活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Economic factors and the Kauffman startup activity index
Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine entrepreneurial activity in the USA and whether it supports a “pull” or a “push” theory of startup creation. The “push” theory argues that individuals are pushed into entrepreneurship by negative external forces, such as job dissatisfaction, difficulty finding employment, insufficient salary or inflexible work schedule. The “pull” theory contends that individuals are attracted into entrepreneurial activities seeking independence, self-fulfillment, wealth and other desirable outcomes. Design/methodology/approach This paper incorporates three well-established measures when looking at impact factors; unemployment rates, gross domestic product (GDP) and household income. The current study is unique in that it introduces the Kauffman Startup Activity Index (KSAI) as the measure of entrepreneurial activity when examining impact factors. Findings The results of this study support the “pull” theory (or the entrepreneurial effect) of startup activity and further supports the idea that entrepreneurs look for opportunities in the marketplace, rather than being “forced” into self-employment. Research limitations/implications Research is limited to having US data at the national level. Follow-up research could include parsing the data out to the state and local levels. Social implications The results of this study suggest to the economic development community that incentives during times of economic growth could further incent entrepreneurial activity. Originality/value The tact used by the authors is unique in that it relied upon three historical variables – unemployment rates, US GDP and household income – and introduced a new variable, the KSAI, rather than the previously relied upon national startup activity data or startup activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
36.80%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship (JRME) publishes research that contributes to our developing knowledge of entrepreneurial and small business marketing. Even though research into the relationship between marketing and entrepreneurship is still relatively young, the subject has thus far proved exciting and thought provoking, and critical thinking has progressed rapidly.The journal stands at the interface of research in marketing and entrepreneurship. Coverage may include, but is not limited to: -The size and structure of the entrepreneurial enterprise. -SMEs and micro businesses approach marketing -Intrapreneurship -The role of entrepreneurship in marketing -The role of marketing in entrepreneurship -How do successful entrepreneurs market their product and services? -Competencies necessary for the successful entrepreneur -The role of entrepreneurship (and, as appropriate, intrapreneurship) in the development of organizations -Life cycles of organizations: the stages in the growth of firms and the analysis of critical episodes -The influence of external help, support, and personal contact networks -Opportunity recognition -Relationships between SMEs and larger firms: how SMEs interact successfully with larger firms and how these larger firms in turn manage their relationships with SMEs -Strategic and management issues that pertain to marketing -Cultural and sociological perspectives of the entrepreneur -Cross-cultural studies and work on developing economies -Appropriate research methodologies
期刊最新文献
Incubating innovation: the role of incubators in supporting business model innovation Microentrepreneurs in the gig economy: who they are, what they do, and why they do it Prototypically small: an exploration of consumers’ small business prototypes Navigating start-ups: a qualitative exploration of causal and effectual decision-making in entrepreneurial marketing It’s not just “who” you know, but “how” you know them: how social and commercial relationships differentially influence customer discounts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1