种族灭绝后:危地马拉的和解失败

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Peacebuilding Pub Date : 2022-02-07 DOI:10.1080/21647259.2022.2027660
R. Brett
{"title":"种族灭绝后:危地马拉的和解失败","authors":"R. Brett","doi":"10.1080/21647259.2022.2027660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article seeks to understand the factors that have impeded meaningful intergroup reconciliation in Guatemala by drawing on scholarship addressing reconciliation, the connections between ideology and violence and wider literature in Peace and Conflict Studies. The article interrogates how the ideological and identitarian frameworks that drove the narratives that precipitated and sustained Guatemala’s genocide against the indigenous Maya have continued to shape the post-genocide social and political landscape. It is the continued instrumentalization of these frameworks in the wake of Guatemala’s peace process that has impeded intergroup reconciliation. Specifically, the article contends that a core driver of Guatemala’s failed reconciliation has been the reticence of the economic and political elites and the Guatemalan military to accept the revision of Guatemala’s conflict history and any meaningful challenge to elite privilege and power. As a result, Guatemala experiences a nexus of continuity between the past and present, between war and peace.","PeriodicalId":45555,"journal":{"name":"Peacebuilding","volume":"10 1","pages":"382 - 402"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In the aftermath of Genocide: Guatemala’s failed reconciliation\",\"authors\":\"R. Brett\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21647259.2022.2027660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article seeks to understand the factors that have impeded meaningful intergroup reconciliation in Guatemala by drawing on scholarship addressing reconciliation, the connections between ideology and violence and wider literature in Peace and Conflict Studies. The article interrogates how the ideological and identitarian frameworks that drove the narratives that precipitated and sustained Guatemala’s genocide against the indigenous Maya have continued to shape the post-genocide social and political landscape. It is the continued instrumentalization of these frameworks in the wake of Guatemala’s peace process that has impeded intergroup reconciliation. Specifically, the article contends that a core driver of Guatemala’s failed reconciliation has been the reticence of the economic and political elites and the Guatemalan military to accept the revision of Guatemala’s conflict history and any meaningful challenge to elite privilege and power. As a result, Guatemala experiences a nexus of continuity between the past and present, between war and peace.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peacebuilding\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"382 - 402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peacebuilding\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2022.2027660\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peacebuilding","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2022.2027660","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图通过借鉴和解、意识形态与暴力之间的联系以及和平与冲突研究中更广泛的文献,了解阻碍危地马拉有意义的群体间和解的因素。这篇文章探讨了促使危地马拉对土著玛雅人进行种族灭绝的叙事的意识形态和身份认同框架,如何继续塑造种族灭绝后的社会和政治格局。正是在危地马拉的和平进程之后继续将这些框架作为工具,阻碍了群体间的和解。具体来说,这篇文章认为,危地马拉和解失败的一个核心驱动因素是经济、政治精英和危地马拉军方不愿接受对危地马拉冲突历史的修订,也不愿接受对精英特权和权力的任何有意义的挑战。因此,危地马拉经历了过去与现在、战争与和平之间的连续性联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In the aftermath of Genocide: Guatemala’s failed reconciliation
ABSTRACT This article seeks to understand the factors that have impeded meaningful intergroup reconciliation in Guatemala by drawing on scholarship addressing reconciliation, the connections between ideology and violence and wider literature in Peace and Conflict Studies. The article interrogates how the ideological and identitarian frameworks that drove the narratives that precipitated and sustained Guatemala’s genocide against the indigenous Maya have continued to shape the post-genocide social and political landscape. It is the continued instrumentalization of these frameworks in the wake of Guatemala’s peace process that has impeded intergroup reconciliation. Specifically, the article contends that a core driver of Guatemala’s failed reconciliation has been the reticence of the economic and political elites and the Guatemalan military to accept the revision of Guatemala’s conflict history and any meaningful challenge to elite privilege and power. As a result, Guatemala experiences a nexus of continuity between the past and present, between war and peace.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peacebuilding
Peacebuilding Multiple-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
The fragmentation of the security-development nexus: the UK government’s approach to security and development 2015-2022 Micro-level experiences, understandings and visions of peace in Sri Lanka’s war victory Feel the grass grow: ecologies of slow peace in Colombia Feel the grass grow: ecologies of slow peace in Colombia , by Angela Jill Lederach, Stanford, California, USA, Stanford University Press, 2023, 281 pp., 30 USD (paperback), ISBN 9781503635685 Urban restructuring and the reproduction of spaces of violence in Belfast Swimming against the tide: transfer from civil society consultations to track 1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1