Violetta Kwiatkowska-Wójcikiewicz, J. Wójcikiewicz
{"title":"关于提取DNA参考样本——对2020年4月14日欧洲人权法院对德拉甘·彼得罗维奇诉塞尔维亚案判决的评论，申请号:75229/10","authors":"Violetta Kwiatkowska-Wójcikiewicz, J. Wójcikiewicz","doi":"10.12775/clr.2021.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The comment deals with the evaluation of (not only) Serbian law concerning taking body samples for DNA examinations. The authors share the arguments of the dissenting opinion from the judgment in question that the phrase “other medical procedures” was at that stage sufficient for such a procedure. A comparative analysis of the Polish law is also conducted.","PeriodicalId":36604,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Taking DNA Reference Samples - Comment to the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 14 April 2020 in the Case of Dragan Petrović v. Serbia, Application no. 75229/10\",\"authors\":\"Violetta Kwiatkowska-Wójcikiewicz, J. Wójcikiewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.12775/clr.2021.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The comment deals with the evaluation of (not only) Serbian law concerning taking body samples for DNA examinations. The authors share the arguments of the dissenting opinion from the judgment in question that the phrase “other medical procedures” was at that stage sufficient for such a procedure. A comparative analysis of the Polish law is also conducted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12775/clr.2021.019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/clr.2021.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
On Taking DNA Reference Samples - Comment to the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 14 April 2020 in the Case of Dragan Petrović v. Serbia, Application no. 75229/10
The comment deals with the evaluation of (not only) Serbian law concerning taking body samples for DNA examinations. The authors share the arguments of the dissenting opinion from the judgment in question that the phrase “other medical procedures” was at that stage sufficient for such a procedure. A comparative analysis of the Polish law is also conducted.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
