欧洲COVID-19发病率和病死率的建模和估计

F. Almeida
{"title":"欧洲COVID-19发病率和病死率的建模和估计","authors":"F. Almeida","doi":"10.30476/JHSSS.2020.87047.1105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The estimation of the real number of COVID-19 infected people is one of the concerns of the governments around the world. In this sense, this study seeks to assess the incidence and fatality of COVID-19 in Europe considering the expected number of the infected cases. Methods: A quantitative exploratory study was performed on the top 10 countries most affected by COVID-19 by 9th June in Europe. Furthermore, this study presents three propagation estimation models of the COVID-19 that help us to understand the real incidence of the pandemic in each country. Each model is briefly explained and applied. Results: The findings revealed a great heterogeneity of COVID19 cases and deaths among the countries. The indicator of the number of deaths reveals the greatest disparity between other countries with the United Kingdom, recording about 6 or 7 times more deaths than Russia or Germany. Infection fatality rate (IFR) tends to be a more reliable indicator when analyzing data because it is less dependent on the number of tests performed. Conclusion: Several estimation models can be used to determine the incidence of COVID-19. However, their results in European countries are still quite asymmetrical although they are more reliable than just looking at the perspective of the number of cases or deaths recorded. The infection fatality rate (IFR) emerges as a more accurate indicator by estimating the expected number of registered cases, which includes asymptomatic cases and patients with mild symptoms that are not known and reported by health authorities. Please cite this article as: Almeida F. Modeling and Estimating the COVID19 Incidence and Fatality in Europe. J Health Sci Surveillance Sys. 2020;8(4):179-182.","PeriodicalId":16034,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health sciences and surveillance system","volume":"8 1","pages":"179-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling and Estimating the COVID-19 Incidence and Fatality in Europe\",\"authors\":\"F. Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.30476/JHSSS.2020.87047.1105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The estimation of the real number of COVID-19 infected people is one of the concerns of the governments around the world. In this sense, this study seeks to assess the incidence and fatality of COVID-19 in Europe considering the expected number of the infected cases. Methods: A quantitative exploratory study was performed on the top 10 countries most affected by COVID-19 by 9th June in Europe. Furthermore, this study presents three propagation estimation models of the COVID-19 that help us to understand the real incidence of the pandemic in each country. Each model is briefly explained and applied. Results: The findings revealed a great heterogeneity of COVID19 cases and deaths among the countries. The indicator of the number of deaths reveals the greatest disparity between other countries with the United Kingdom, recording about 6 or 7 times more deaths than Russia or Germany. Infection fatality rate (IFR) tends to be a more reliable indicator when analyzing data because it is less dependent on the number of tests performed. Conclusion: Several estimation models can be used to determine the incidence of COVID-19. However, their results in European countries are still quite asymmetrical although they are more reliable than just looking at the perspective of the number of cases or deaths recorded. The infection fatality rate (IFR) emerges as a more accurate indicator by estimating the expected number of registered cases, which includes asymptomatic cases and patients with mild symptoms that are not known and reported by health authorities. Please cite this article as: Almeida F. Modeling and Estimating the COVID19 Incidence and Fatality in Europe. J Health Sci Surveillance Sys. 2020;8(4):179-182.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of health sciences and surveillance system\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"179-182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of health sciences and surveillance system\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30476/JHSSS.2020.87047.1105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health sciences and surveillance system","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/JHSSS.2020.87047.1105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:COVID-19实际感染人数的估计是世界各国政府关注的问题之一。从这个意义上说,本研究旨在考虑到预计感染病例数,评估COVID-19在欧洲的发病率和死亡率。方法:对截至6月9日欧洲疫情最严重的10个国家进行定量探索性研究。此外,本研究提出了COVID-19的三种传播估计模型,有助于我们了解每个国家大流行的真实发病率。对每个模型进行了简要的解释和应用。结果:调查结果显示,各国新冠肺炎病例和死亡人数存在很大差异。死亡人数指标显示,其他国家与联合王国之间的差距最大,记录的死亡人数是俄罗斯或德国的6至7倍。在分析数据时,感染致死率(IFR)往往是一个更可靠的指标,因为它较少依赖于所进行的检测次数。结论:几种估计模型可用于确定COVID-19的发病率。然而,它们在欧洲国家的结果仍然相当不对称,尽管它们比仅仅从记录的病例或死亡人数的角度来看更可靠。感染致死率(IFR)通过估计预计的登记病例数(包括卫生当局不知道和报告的无症状病例和症状轻微的患者)成为一个更准确的指标。阿尔梅达·F.欧洲covid - 19发病率和死亡率的建模和估计。卫生科学监测学报,2020;8(4):179-182。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling and Estimating the COVID-19 Incidence and Fatality in Europe
Background: The estimation of the real number of COVID-19 infected people is one of the concerns of the governments around the world. In this sense, this study seeks to assess the incidence and fatality of COVID-19 in Europe considering the expected number of the infected cases. Methods: A quantitative exploratory study was performed on the top 10 countries most affected by COVID-19 by 9th June in Europe. Furthermore, this study presents three propagation estimation models of the COVID-19 that help us to understand the real incidence of the pandemic in each country. Each model is briefly explained and applied. Results: The findings revealed a great heterogeneity of COVID19 cases and deaths among the countries. The indicator of the number of deaths reveals the greatest disparity between other countries with the United Kingdom, recording about 6 or 7 times more deaths than Russia or Germany. Infection fatality rate (IFR) tends to be a more reliable indicator when analyzing data because it is less dependent on the number of tests performed. Conclusion: Several estimation models can be used to determine the incidence of COVID-19. However, their results in European countries are still quite asymmetrical although they are more reliable than just looking at the perspective of the number of cases or deaths recorded. The infection fatality rate (IFR) emerges as a more accurate indicator by estimating the expected number of registered cases, which includes asymptomatic cases and patients with mild symptoms that are not known and reported by health authorities. Please cite this article as: Almeida F. Modeling and Estimating the COVID19 Incidence and Fatality in Europe. J Health Sci Surveillance Sys. 2020;8(4):179-182.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of health sciences and surveillance system
Journal of health sciences and surveillance system Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Psychometric Properties of Frailty Syndrome Checklist 5-Items in Frail Older Adults in Iran Construction, Design and Testing of Infectious Waste Decontamination Device by Mechanical and Chemical Methods, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Sarab, Iran: A Case Study The Effect of Education of Physical Activity via Social Networks on the Quality of Life in Menopausal Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessment of Productivity in Health Centers after Health Transformation Plan in Iran Comparison of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella Removal Efficiency in Aquatic Environments Using Silver and Copper Nanoparticles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1