应用社区检测方法解剖自闭症谱系障碍患者皮质下脑容量的异质性

Ting Li, M. Hoogman, N. Roth Mota, J. Buitelaar, A. Vasquez, B. Franke, D. van Rooij
{"title":"应用社区检测方法解剖自闭症谱系障碍患者皮质下脑容量的异质性","authors":"Ting Li, M. Hoogman, N. Roth Mota, J. Buitelaar, A. Vasquez, B. Franke, D. van Rooij","doi":"10.1101/2020.09.09.288993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Structural brain alterations found in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) have previously been very heterogeneous, with overall limited effect sizes for every region implicated. In this study, we aimed at exploring the existence of subgroups in ASD, based on neuroanatomic profiles; we hypothesized that effect sizes of case/control difference would be increased in defined subgroups. Using the dataset from the ENIGMA-ASD Working Group (n=2661), exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was applied on seven subcortical volumes of individuals with ASD and controls to uncover the underlying organization of subcortical structures. Based on earlier findings in ADHD patients and controls as well as data availability, we focused on three age groups: boys (aged 4-14 years), male adolescents (aged 14-22 years), and adult men (aged >=22 years). The resulting factor scores were used in a community detection (CD) analysis, to cluster participants into subgroups. Three factors were found in each sample, with the factor structure in adult men differing from that in boys and male adolescents. From the patterns in these factors, CD uncovered four distinct communities in boys and three communities in adolescents and adult men, irrespective of ASD diagnostic status. The effect sizes of case/control comparisons appeared more pronounced than in the whole sample in some communities. Based on subcortical volumes, we succeeded in stratifying our participants into more homogeneous subgroups with similar brain structural patterns. The stratification enhanced our ability to observe case/control differences of subcortical brain volumes in ASD, and may help explain some of the heterogeneity of previous findings in ASD.","PeriodicalId":72339,"journal":{"name":"Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissecting the heterogeneous subcortical brain volume of autism spectrum disorder using community detection\",\"authors\":\"Ting Li, M. Hoogman, N. Roth Mota, J. Buitelaar, A. Vasquez, B. Franke, D. van Rooij\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2020.09.09.288993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Structural brain alterations found in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) have previously been very heterogeneous, with overall limited effect sizes for every region implicated. In this study, we aimed at exploring the existence of subgroups in ASD, based on neuroanatomic profiles; we hypothesized that effect sizes of case/control difference would be increased in defined subgroups. Using the dataset from the ENIGMA-ASD Working Group (n=2661), exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was applied on seven subcortical volumes of individuals with ASD and controls to uncover the underlying organization of subcortical structures. Based on earlier findings in ADHD patients and controls as well as data availability, we focused on three age groups: boys (aged 4-14 years), male adolescents (aged 14-22 years), and adult men (aged >=22 years). The resulting factor scores were used in a community detection (CD) analysis, to cluster participants into subgroups. Three factors were found in each sample, with the factor structure in adult men differing from that in boys and male adolescents. From the patterns in these factors, CD uncovered four distinct communities in boys and three communities in adolescents and adult men, irrespective of ASD diagnostic status. The effect sizes of case/control comparisons appeared more pronounced than in the whole sample in some communities. Based on subcortical volumes, we succeeded in stratifying our participants into more homogeneous subgroups with similar brain structural patterns. The stratification enhanced our ability to observe case/control differences of subcortical brain volumes in ASD, and may help explain some of the heterogeneity of previous findings in ASD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.09.288993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.09.288993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)中发现的大脑结构改变以前是非常异质的,每个区域的总体影响大小有限。在这项研究中,我们旨在根据神经解剖学特征,探索ASD亚组的存在;我们假设在定义的亚组中,病例/对照差异的影响大小会增加。使用ENIGMA-ASD工作组的数据集(n=2661),对ASD患者和对照组的七个皮质下体积进行探索性因素分析(EFA),以揭示皮质下结构的潜在组织。根据早期对ADHD患者和对照组的研究结果以及数据可用性,我们将重点放在三个年龄组:男孩(4-14岁)、男性青少年(14-22岁)和成年男性(>=22岁)。将由此产生的因素得分用于社区检测(CD)分析,将参与者分组。在每个样本中发现了三个因素,成年男性的因素结构与男孩和男性青少年的因素结构不同。从这些因素的模式来看,CD在男孩中发现了四个不同的社区,在青少年和成年男性中发现了三个社区,无论ASD的诊断状况如何。在一些社区,病例/对照比较的影响大小似乎比整个样本更明显。根据皮层下体积,我们成功地将参与者分为具有相似大脑结构模式的更同质的亚组。分层增强了我们观察ASD皮质下脑容量的病例/对照差异的能力,并可能有助于解释ASD先前发现的一些异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dissecting the heterogeneous subcortical brain volume of autism spectrum disorder using community detection
Structural brain alterations found in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) have previously been very heterogeneous, with overall limited effect sizes for every region implicated. In this study, we aimed at exploring the existence of subgroups in ASD, based on neuroanatomic profiles; we hypothesized that effect sizes of case/control difference would be increased in defined subgroups. Using the dataset from the ENIGMA-ASD Working Group (n=2661), exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was applied on seven subcortical volumes of individuals with ASD and controls to uncover the underlying organization of subcortical structures. Based on earlier findings in ADHD patients and controls as well as data availability, we focused on three age groups: boys (aged 4-14 years), male adolescents (aged 14-22 years), and adult men (aged >=22 years). The resulting factor scores were used in a community detection (CD) analysis, to cluster participants into subgroups. Three factors were found in each sample, with the factor structure in adult men differing from that in boys and male adolescents. From the patterns in these factors, CD uncovered four distinct communities in boys and three communities in adolescents and adult men, irrespective of ASD diagnostic status. The effect sizes of case/control comparisons appeared more pronounced than in the whole sample in some communities. Based on subcortical volumes, we succeeded in stratifying our participants into more homogeneous subgroups with similar brain structural patterns. The stratification enhanced our ability to observe case/control differences of subcortical brain volumes in ASD, and may help explain some of the heterogeneity of previous findings in ASD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Idiosyncratic pupil regulation in autistic children. Resilience and strengths in the Black autism community in the United States: A scoping review. Comparative effectiveness trial: Modular behavior approach for young autistic children compared to comprehensive behavioral intervention. Cultivating the imagination: Caregiver input during pretend play with toddlers at elevated likelihood for autism. Eye-tracking training improves visuospatial working memory of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1