全球COVID-19封锁凸显了人类既是环境的威胁,也是环境的守护者。生物保护,26,109175

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting Social and Environmental Accountability Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-02 DOI:10.1080/0969160X.2022.2135689
N. Descalzo-Ruiz
{"title":"全球COVID-19封锁凸显了人类既是环境的威胁,也是环境的守护者。生物保护,26,109175","authors":"N. Descalzo-Ruiz","doi":"10.1080/0969160X.2022.2135689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quasi-experimental conditions of the global COVID-19 lockdown can illuminate new paths for our role as stewards of nature. On April 5th, 2020, it was estimated that 4.4 billion people were a ff ected by lockdown measures (i.e. 57% of the world ’ s population). First impressions and reports led to the belief that reducing human presence and mobility only positively a ff ected ecosystems. However, a more detailed and area-speci fi c analysis reveals that humans also have a key role as custodians of nature, which was also negatively impacted by the lockdown. In Bates et al. (2021), nearly 350 scientists present data from 67 di ff erent countries about the e ff ects of the global COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 on the relationship of humans with wildlife and ecosystems. The study aggregates media reports, qualitative observations, and more than 300 responses on wildlife using data provided by scienti fi c monitoring programmes covering large geographic areas. In total, more than 1.000 assessments are integrated to under-stand both the positive and negative e ff ects of the lockdown and how these interact in four main areas: 1) human mobility and activity, 2) biodiversity threats, 3) wildlife responses, and 4) social structures and systems for conservation. In a highly intercon-nected globalised society, in a matter of days, air travel decreased by 75%, driving by 41%, and marine tra ffi c by 9%, while humans stayed most of their time at home. This phenomenon, which provides quasi-experimental conditions for studying the impact of human activity on nature, was named anthropause by Rutz et al. (2020). The fi rst set of observations of Bates et al. (2021) renders visible the unexpected negative consequences of the lack of human presence, surveillance, and active conservation e ff orts for biodiversity. In countries where outdoor activities were allowed, visits to","PeriodicalId":38053,"journal":{"name":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global COVID-19 lockdown highlights humans as both threats and custodians of the environment. Biological Conservation, 263, 109175\",\"authors\":\"N. Descalzo-Ruiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0969160X.2022.2135689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The quasi-experimental conditions of the global COVID-19 lockdown can illuminate new paths for our role as stewards of nature. On April 5th, 2020, it was estimated that 4.4 billion people were a ff ected by lockdown measures (i.e. 57% of the world ’ s population). First impressions and reports led to the belief that reducing human presence and mobility only positively a ff ected ecosystems. However, a more detailed and area-speci fi c analysis reveals that humans also have a key role as custodians of nature, which was also negatively impacted by the lockdown. In Bates et al. (2021), nearly 350 scientists present data from 67 di ff erent countries about the e ff ects of the global COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 on the relationship of humans with wildlife and ecosystems. The study aggregates media reports, qualitative observations, and more than 300 responses on wildlife using data provided by scienti fi c monitoring programmes covering large geographic areas. In total, more than 1.000 assessments are integrated to under-stand both the positive and negative e ff ects of the lockdown and how these interact in four main areas: 1) human mobility and activity, 2) biodiversity threats, 3) wildlife responses, and 4) social structures and systems for conservation. In a highly intercon-nected globalised society, in a matter of days, air travel decreased by 75%, driving by 41%, and marine tra ffi c by 9%, while humans stayed most of their time at home. This phenomenon, which provides quasi-experimental conditions for studying the impact of human activity on nature, was named anthropause by Rutz et al. (2020). The fi rst set of observations of Bates et al. (2021) renders visible the unexpected negative consequences of the lack of human presence, surveillance, and active conservation e ff orts for biodiversity. In countries where outdoor activities were allowed, visits to\",\"PeriodicalId\":38053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2022.2135689\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2022.2135689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

全球COVID-19封锁的准实验条件可以为我们作为自然管家的角色照亮新的道路。2020年4月5日,据估计有44亿人受到封锁措施的影响(占世界人口的57%)。第一印象和报告导致人们相信,减少人类的存在和流动性只会对生态系统产生积极影响。然而,更详细和具体地区的分析表明,人类作为自然的守护者也发挥着关键作用,这也受到了封锁的负面影响。在Bates et al.(2021)中,近350名科学家提供了来自67个不同国家的数据,说明2020年全球COVID-19封锁对人类与野生动物和生态系统关系的影响。这项研究汇总了媒体报道、定性观察和300多个关于野生动物的回应,这些回应使用了覆盖大地理区域的科学监测项目提供的数据。总共整合了1000多项评估,以了解封锁的积极和消极影响,以及这些影响如何在四个主要领域相互作用:1)人类流动性和活动,2)生物多样性威胁,3)野生动物反应,以及4)保护的社会结构和系统。在一个高度相互联系的全球化社会中,在短短几天内,航空旅行减少了75%,驾驶减少了41%,海上交通减少了9%,而人类大部分时间都呆在家里。这种现象为研究人类活动对自然的影响提供了准实验条件,Rutz et al.(2020)将其命名为anthropause。Bates等人(2021年)的第一组观察结果表明,缺乏人类存在、监督和积极保护生物多样性的努力所带来的意想不到的负面后果是显而易见的。在允许户外活动的国家,参观
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global COVID-19 lockdown highlights humans as both threats and custodians of the environment. Biological Conservation, 263, 109175
The quasi-experimental conditions of the global COVID-19 lockdown can illuminate new paths for our role as stewards of nature. On April 5th, 2020, it was estimated that 4.4 billion people were a ff ected by lockdown measures (i.e. 57% of the world ’ s population). First impressions and reports led to the belief that reducing human presence and mobility only positively a ff ected ecosystems. However, a more detailed and area-speci fi c analysis reveals that humans also have a key role as custodians of nature, which was also negatively impacted by the lockdown. In Bates et al. (2021), nearly 350 scientists present data from 67 di ff erent countries about the e ff ects of the global COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 on the relationship of humans with wildlife and ecosystems. The study aggregates media reports, qualitative observations, and more than 300 responses on wildlife using data provided by scienti fi c monitoring programmes covering large geographic areas. In total, more than 1.000 assessments are integrated to under-stand both the positive and negative e ff ects of the lockdown and how these interact in four main areas: 1) human mobility and activity, 2) biodiversity threats, 3) wildlife responses, and 4) social structures and systems for conservation. In a highly intercon-nected globalised society, in a matter of days, air travel decreased by 75%, driving by 41%, and marine tra ffi c by 9%, while humans stayed most of their time at home. This phenomenon, which provides quasi-experimental conditions for studying the impact of human activity on nature, was named anthropause by Rutz et al. (2020). The fi rst set of observations of Bates et al. (2021) renders visible the unexpected negative consequences of the lack of human presence, surveillance, and active conservation e ff orts for biodiversity. In countries where outdoor activities were allowed, visits to
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social and Environmental Accountability Journal
Social and Environmental Accountability Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Accounting
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Social and Environmental Accountability Journal (SEAJ) is the official Journal of The Centre for Social and Environmental Accounting Research. It is a predominantly refereed Journal committed to the creation of a new academic literature in the broad field of social, environmental and sustainable development accounting, accountability, reporting and auditing. The Journal provides a forum for a wide range of different forms of academic and academic-related communications whose aim is to balance honesty and scholarly rigour with directness, clarity, policy-relevance and novelty. SEAJ welcomes all contributions that fulfil the criteria of the journal, including empirical papers, review papers and essays, manuscripts reporting or proposing engagement, commentaries and polemics, and reviews of articles or books. A key feature of SEAJ is that papers are shorter than the word length typically anticipated in academic journals in the social sciences. A clearer breakdown of the proposed word length for each type of paper in SEAJ can be found here.
期刊最新文献
Cultural Circularities that Limit Diversity: Emancipating Voices Finding Our Voices – Exploring Diversity, Inclusion and Accounting by the Marginalised and Managed Diverse Queer Performance of Gay and Cis Men Accountants from the Perspective of Tokenism Moving Beyond the External Face of Accountability: Constructing Accountability for Sustainability from WithinFrostenson, M., & Johnstone, L. (2023). Moving beyond the external face of accountability: Constructing accountability for sustainability from within. Sustainability Accounting, Management an Is There No Sin Down South of the Equator? Brazilian Auditors’ Perception of the Gendered and Racialized Dynamics in Audit Firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1