{"title":"早期的现代罗马在移动","authors":"Niall Atkinson, Susanna Caviglia","doi":"10.1086/723398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the late sixteenth century, the monumental new cupola of St. Peter’s Basilica was normally the first glimpse of Rome noted by visitors arriving from the north along the Via Francigena. This route followed the ancient Via Cassia through southern Tuscany from Siena into Lazio, where the travelers joined the Via Flaminia just north of the Tiber (fig. 1). From there, they crossed over the Milvian Bridge, where the emperor Maxentius was defeated by Constantine in 312 and where they often began their reflection upon the city’s ancient heritage. In the space between these two views of Rome’s modernity and antiquity, visitors traversed the threshold between the seemingly depopulated arid landscape of the agro romano, the meandering flow of the Tiber, and the cultivated villas (vigne) emerging at the periphery of the city. After the bridge, the suddenly rectilinear trajectory of the Via Flaminia to the Porta del Popolo ushered the traveler onto the expanding network of newly laid out avenues that were linking the city’s ancient monuments to its aspiring triumphant modernity. These landscapes, waterscapes, and cityscapes constituted three intersecting ecologies that were alternately explored, described, lamented, and celebrated by visitors, whose journeys stitched together multiple and often opposing narratives of the transforming city. While papal planners were designing Rome’s possible futures, foreigners—whether humanists, diplomats, or artists—were developing ways of representing both the degradation and the regeneration of its topographies as a series of interconnected itineraries. This study, therefore, traces the ways in which a range of official design technologies and individual representational practices connected the ecologies of early modern Rome. It argues that these practices were centered","PeriodicalId":39613,"journal":{"name":"Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics","volume":"77-78 1","pages":"100 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early modern Rome on the move\",\"authors\":\"Niall Atkinson, Susanna Caviglia\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/723398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From the late sixteenth century, the monumental new cupola of St. Peter’s Basilica was normally the first glimpse of Rome noted by visitors arriving from the north along the Via Francigena. This route followed the ancient Via Cassia through southern Tuscany from Siena into Lazio, where the travelers joined the Via Flaminia just north of the Tiber (fig. 1). From there, they crossed over the Milvian Bridge, where the emperor Maxentius was defeated by Constantine in 312 and where they often began their reflection upon the city’s ancient heritage. In the space between these two views of Rome’s modernity and antiquity, visitors traversed the threshold between the seemingly depopulated arid landscape of the agro romano, the meandering flow of the Tiber, and the cultivated villas (vigne) emerging at the periphery of the city. After the bridge, the suddenly rectilinear trajectory of the Via Flaminia to the Porta del Popolo ushered the traveler onto the expanding network of newly laid out avenues that were linking the city’s ancient monuments to its aspiring triumphant modernity. These landscapes, waterscapes, and cityscapes constituted three intersecting ecologies that were alternately explored, described, lamented, and celebrated by visitors, whose journeys stitched together multiple and often opposing narratives of the transforming city. While papal planners were designing Rome’s possible futures, foreigners—whether humanists, diplomats, or artists—were developing ways of representing both the degradation and the regeneration of its topographies as a series of interconnected itineraries. This study, therefore, traces the ways in which a range of official design technologies and individual representational practices connected the ecologies of early modern Rome. It argues that these practices were centered\",\"PeriodicalId\":39613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics\",\"volume\":\"77-78 1\",\"pages\":\"100 - 119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/723398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/723398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
从16世纪末开始,圣彼得大教堂的新圆顶通常是从北部沿着Via Francigena抵达的游客第一次看到罗马。这条路线沿着古老的卡西亚大街穿过托斯卡纳南部,从锡耶纳进入拉齐奥,在那里,游客们加入了台伯河以北的弗拉米尼亚大街(图1)。从那里,他们跨过了米尔维安大桥,312年,皇帝马克森提乌斯在那里被君士坦丁击败,他们经常在那里开始反思这座城市的古老遗产。在罗马现代性和古代性这两种观点之间的空间里,游客们穿过了看似人烟稀少的罗马农业干旱景观、蜿蜒的台伯河和城市外围出现的耕种别墅(小插曲)之间的门槛。桥后,弗拉米尼亚大街(Via Flaminia)到波波洛门(Porta del Popolo。这些景观、水景和城市景观构成了三个交叉的生态系统,游客们交替探索、描述、哀叹和庆祝,他们的旅程将这座正在转型的城市的多种且往往相反的叙事拼接在一起。当教皇的规划者正在设计罗马可能的未来时,外国人——无论是人文主义者、外交官还是艺术家——都在发展将其地形的退化和再生表现为一系列相互关联的行程的方式。因此,这项研究追溯了一系列官方设计技术和个人表征实践与现代罗马早期生态的联系方式。它认为这些做法是以
From the late sixteenth century, the monumental new cupola of St. Peter’s Basilica was normally the first glimpse of Rome noted by visitors arriving from the north along the Via Francigena. This route followed the ancient Via Cassia through southern Tuscany from Siena into Lazio, where the travelers joined the Via Flaminia just north of the Tiber (fig. 1). From there, they crossed over the Milvian Bridge, where the emperor Maxentius was defeated by Constantine in 312 and where they often began their reflection upon the city’s ancient heritage. In the space between these two views of Rome’s modernity and antiquity, visitors traversed the threshold between the seemingly depopulated arid landscape of the agro romano, the meandering flow of the Tiber, and the cultivated villas (vigne) emerging at the periphery of the city. After the bridge, the suddenly rectilinear trajectory of the Via Flaminia to the Porta del Popolo ushered the traveler onto the expanding network of newly laid out avenues that were linking the city’s ancient monuments to its aspiring triumphant modernity. These landscapes, waterscapes, and cityscapes constituted three intersecting ecologies that were alternately explored, described, lamented, and celebrated by visitors, whose journeys stitched together multiple and often opposing narratives of the transforming city. While papal planners were designing Rome’s possible futures, foreigners—whether humanists, diplomats, or artists—were developing ways of representing both the degradation and the regeneration of its topographies as a series of interconnected itineraries. This study, therefore, traces the ways in which a range of official design technologies and individual representational practices connected the ecologies of early modern Rome. It argues that these practices were centered
期刊介绍:
Res is a journal of anthropology and comparative aesthetics dedicated to the study of the object, in particular cult and belief objects and objects of art. The journal brings together, in an anthropological perspective, contributions by philosophers, art historians, archaeologists, critics, linguists, architects, artists, and others. Its field of inquiry is open to all cultures, regions, and historical periods. Res also seeks to make available textual and iconographic documents of importance for the history and theory of the arts.