{"title":"基于承载面积曲线技术的现场表面磨损评估","authors":"Nurul Farhana Mohd Yusof, Z. M. Ripin","doi":"10.1080/17515831.2022.2045421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Wear during running-in of rolling contact occurs at the surface asperities level and cannot be assessed using a conventional mass loss technique due to the very small changes. The purpose of this paper is to propose an in-situ wear volume measurement using the BAC technique. The experimental work is conducted in-situ and a fixed datum is set as a reference to avoid measurement errors. The wear volume measurement using a proposed BAC technique is in good agreement with the asperities profile-based technique with a small error of 1.67%. The relocation at 90% of BAC is unnecessary as it causes a measurement error of 4.67%. Therefore, the assumption that no change in the asperity valleys beyond 90% of BAC is inaccurate and may lead to error in the wear volume assessment. This study provides a validation of the BAC technique that has been used extensively in wear volume measurement. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":23331,"journal":{"name":"Tribology - Materials, Surfaces & Interfaces","volume":"16 1","pages":"235 - 244"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-situ surface wear assessment using a bearing area curve technique\",\"authors\":\"Nurul Farhana Mohd Yusof, Z. M. Ripin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17515831.2022.2045421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Wear during running-in of rolling contact occurs at the surface asperities level and cannot be assessed using a conventional mass loss technique due to the very small changes. The purpose of this paper is to propose an in-situ wear volume measurement using the BAC technique. The experimental work is conducted in-situ and a fixed datum is set as a reference to avoid measurement errors. The wear volume measurement using a proposed BAC technique is in good agreement with the asperities profile-based technique with a small error of 1.67%. The relocation at 90% of BAC is unnecessary as it causes a measurement error of 4.67%. Therefore, the assumption that no change in the asperity valleys beyond 90% of BAC is inaccurate and may lead to error in the wear volume assessment. This study provides a validation of the BAC technique that has been used extensively in wear volume measurement. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT\",\"PeriodicalId\":23331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tribology - Materials, Surfaces & Interfaces\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"235 - 244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tribology - Materials, Surfaces & Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17515831.2022.2045421\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COATINGS & FILMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tribology - Materials, Surfaces & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17515831.2022.2045421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COATINGS & FILMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
In-situ surface wear assessment using a bearing area curve technique
ABSTRACT Wear during running-in of rolling contact occurs at the surface asperities level and cannot be assessed using a conventional mass loss technique due to the very small changes. The purpose of this paper is to propose an in-situ wear volume measurement using the BAC technique. The experimental work is conducted in-situ and a fixed datum is set as a reference to avoid measurement errors. The wear volume measurement using a proposed BAC technique is in good agreement with the asperities profile-based technique with a small error of 1.67%. The relocation at 90% of BAC is unnecessary as it causes a measurement error of 4.67%. Therefore, the assumption that no change in the asperity valleys beyond 90% of BAC is inaccurate and may lead to error in the wear volume assessment. This study provides a validation of the BAC technique that has been used extensively in wear volume measurement. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT