{"title":"博纳文图拉谈《亚当》中的习惯恩典:对自然和恩典的心的转变?","authors":"K. Jones","doi":"10.1353/FRC.2018.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Bonaventure asserts in his Sentences commentary that Adam was created without sanctifying grace, a point noted by Christopher Cullen and John Milbank. However, he does not advert to this claim in the Breviloquium, Itinerarium Mentis, and Disputed Questions on the Knowledge of Christ, and his theology as a whole is more consistent with the position that Adam was created in the state of grace. The similarities between Bonaventure's Sentences commentary and the Summa Fratris Alexandris lend credence to this argument; in his early work Bonaventure followed the established expert, but he did not defend the inherited position in his later works, where his theology of the human end points towards a single supernatural end. Created good and ordered to his supernatural end, Adam's creation in grace puts Bonaventure in tension with Cullen's development of Bonaventure's theological anthropology.","PeriodicalId":53533,"journal":{"name":"Franciscan Studies","volume":"76 1","pages":"39 - 66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FRC.2018.0002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bonaventure on Habitual Grace in Adam: A Change of Heart on Nature and Grace?\",\"authors\":\"K. Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/FRC.2018.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Bonaventure asserts in his Sentences commentary that Adam was created without sanctifying grace, a point noted by Christopher Cullen and John Milbank. However, he does not advert to this claim in the Breviloquium, Itinerarium Mentis, and Disputed Questions on the Knowledge of Christ, and his theology as a whole is more consistent with the position that Adam was created in the state of grace. The similarities between Bonaventure's Sentences commentary and the Summa Fratris Alexandris lend credence to this argument; in his early work Bonaventure followed the established expert, but he did not defend the inherited position in his later works, where his theology of the human end points towards a single supernatural end. Created good and ordered to his supernatural end, Adam's creation in grace puts Bonaventure in tension with Cullen's development of Bonaventure's theological anthropology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Franciscan Studies\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"39 - 66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FRC.2018.0002\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Franciscan Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/FRC.2018.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Franciscan Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/FRC.2018.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
摘要:博纳文特尔在他的《句子》评论中断言,亚当是在没有神圣恩典的情况下创造的,克里斯托弗·卡伦和约翰·米尔班克指出了这一点。然而,他在Breviloquium、Itinerarium Mentis和关于基督知识的争议问题中并没有注意到这一说法,他的神学作为一个整体更符合亚当是在恩典状态下被创造的立场。博纳文特尔的《句子》评论与亚历山大的《Fratris Summa Alexandris》之间的相似之处为这一论点提供了证据;在他的早期作品中,博纳文图拉遵循了既定的专家,但他并没有在后来的作品中捍卫继承的地位,在他的作品中,他对人类终结的神学指向一个单一的超自然终结。亚当被创造得很好,并被命令达到超自然的目的,他在恩典中的创造使博纳文图拉与库伦对博纳文图拉神学人类学的发展产生了紧张关系。
Bonaventure on Habitual Grace in Adam: A Change of Heart on Nature and Grace?
Abstract:Bonaventure asserts in his Sentences commentary that Adam was created without sanctifying grace, a point noted by Christopher Cullen and John Milbank. However, he does not advert to this claim in the Breviloquium, Itinerarium Mentis, and Disputed Questions on the Knowledge of Christ, and his theology as a whole is more consistent with the position that Adam was created in the state of grace. The similarities between Bonaventure's Sentences commentary and the Summa Fratris Alexandris lend credence to this argument; in his early work Bonaventure followed the established expert, but he did not defend the inherited position in his later works, where his theology of the human end points towards a single supernatural end. Created good and ordered to his supernatural end, Adam's creation in grace puts Bonaventure in tension with Cullen's development of Bonaventure's theological anthropology.